Yes, and I can think of at least 3 or 4 immediately. I used to get the
football scores for one of them while he was far away from home.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, N4BAA - Jose Castillo wrote:
> What's the big deal?
>
> I have been sent to Iraq, GodDanmistan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Somalia,
lived and worked in Dayton for 10 years and attended every year and though
it was just the world's biggest flea market...
Rod WC7N
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chat"
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:01 PM
Subject:
L PROTECTED]>; "Jeffrey Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Permission issues
At 06:56 PM 06/29/2006, Jeffrey Davis wrote:
Perhaps prevent taxpayer money from funding amateur radio
DXpeditions
in the future? My read on
At 09:28 PM 06/29/2006, WC7N wrote:
--Peter that is WONDERFUL and I assume (ass u me) that you are
right... I read all of the published articles and it said nothing about a JOB.
I don't know any more than what I gleaned from Kam's 20+ minute
presentation of from the nice chat I had with him t
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Permission issues
At 06:56 PM 06/29/2006, Jeffrey Davis wrote:
Perhaps prevent taxpayer money from funding amateur radio DXpeditions
in the future? My read on this may be all wrong, but it sure sounds
Rod WC7N
- Original Message - From: "Jeffrey Davis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Permission issues
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds ar
Too much assuming going on on this whole issue I think.
To many unknown facts to make fair judgments.
Carl K8AV
Jeffrey Davis wrote:
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's operating from
Iraq and Afghanistan? Uncle Sam pisses
At 06:56 PM 06/29/2006, Jeffrey Davis wrote:
Perhaps prevent taxpayer money from funding amateur radio DXpeditions
in the future? My read on this may be all wrong, but it sure sounds
like Uncle Sam
funded a good part of this excursion.
Jeff, KE9V
Yes, your read on this is wrong. This was NOT
gt;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Permission issues
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's operating from
Iraq and Afghanistan? Uncle Sam pisses away millions of m
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Permission issues
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's operating from
Iraq and Afghanistan? Uncle Sam pisses away millions of more bux
than this little op they
Jeffrey Davis wrote:
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's operating from
Iraq and Afghanistan? Uncle Sam pisses away millions of more bux
than this little op they guys managed to get landing permission for
while doing contract wor
On Jun 29, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Gary McClellan wrote:
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's operating from
Iraq and Afghanistan? Uncle Sam pisses away millions of more bux
than this little op they guys managed to get landing permission for
while doing contract work. This is one of the
empire
builders unemployed.
Look at the federal government agency that controls ocean fishing. Now
there is a real bureaucracy.
Rod WC7N
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] P
Jeffrey Davis wrote:
Perhaps prevent taxpayer money from funding amateur radio DXpeditions
in the future?
My read on this may be all wrong, but it sure sounds like Uncle Sam
funded a good part of this excursion.
Am I wrong?
-
Jeff, KE9V
Just like the feds are funding ops from the GI's
On Jun 29, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
What is the F&WS trying to do, anyway? Are they trying to
deliberately
prohibit AMATEUR RADIO operations there specifically? Why aren't they
trying to prohibit drug runners from using the island? I'm sure radio
amateurs are more conscientious o
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That is whyDXCC program states that they require proven permission for
> an operation to issue DXCC credit for an operation. Much damage can be
> done and sometimes can cause authorities to never allow amateur access
> again if folks try to skirt
That is whyDXCC program states that they require proven permission for an operation to issue DXCC credit for an operation. Much damage can be done and sometimes can cause authorities to never allow amateur access again if folks try to skirt the rules. The Desecheo situation was obviously poorly han
17 matches
Mail list logo