RE: [DX-CHAT] 7O ARRL

2007-08-12 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
All right gang, once again, please tone it down.  Tempers are starting to
flare, and the only thing that I want to see with flares right now is the
Sun.

73, ron w3wn
administrator, dx chat

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of BKGarcia
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DX-CHAT@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] 7O  ARRL


Mike -- And how did you conclude that eQSL is worthless...?  That seems to
be your opinion, and you are entitled to it.  I'd just like to know how you
came to that conclusion.

Are you implying there is more fraud in the eQSL database than the DXCC
system?  If so, how do you know that?

If there were fraud in the LoTW, do you think it would be readily exposed by
HQ ARRL?  I'm not confident it would be, and that's my opinion.

And how valuable was the bandwidth you used to slam eQSL compared to the
bandwidth others used to piss on the League?  Inquiring minds want to know
how you made that judgement.

In my opinion eQSL is managed with as much integritry as LoTW and the DXCC
program.  eQSL has an incentive to avoid fraud if they are to be successful
(i.e., earn the respect of the ham community while making money).  I had to
fax a copy of my FCC license to eQSL to register.  Isn't that sufficient to
avoid fraud?  eQSL collects donations and fees.  ARRL collects dues and
fees.  Where do you see a significant difference between eQSL and LoTW other
than that the League and DXCC have been in business longer.

You didn't slam the CQ Magazine equivalent of DXCC.  Does that mean you
accept that program?   If so, why?  What about the CQ WAZ program.  5 Band
WAZ seems to me to be a significant achievement -- and you must get paper in
hand to get credit, not just a database entry in LoTW.  Hu

I don't find any significant faults in the way ARRL administers the DXCC
program.  They seem to take it seriously and work to keep it up to date.  I
also don't find any fault with either eQSL or the CQ DX programs.  All have
their rules and they seem to stick to their respective rules.  None of those
programs are worthless in my opinion.

Bert, N8NN


- Original Message -
From: Mike(W5UC)  Kathy(K5MWH) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DX-CHAT@njdxa.org
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] 7O  ARRL


 It's amazing how these discussions always evolve into ARRL bashing
 sessions.  All of this huffing  puffing and crying  moaning the blues
 about how sorry ARRL is, but I never see anyone stepping up to the plate
 to offer anything better.  It's a very simple equation.  If you don't like
 the ARRL, that's fine. Don't participate in DXCC.  Go participate in
 something worthless like e-qsl, but please don't waste our time and
 bandwidth pissing  moaning about the League.

 For me, I think they do an excellent job of managing a program that no-one
 else has the courage(ba**s) nor finding to manage.
 Get over it!

 73,
 Mike, W5UC


 age  treachery will overcome youth  skill
 http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/w5uc/


 Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

 To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org



Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-15 Thread Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH)
I'll echo that!  John, K5MO(and all you other league haters), please 
take a reasonable amount of time to sit and think of anything you can 
that is positive about ARRL.  If you can't find anything you are 
likely among those who just like to bitch about ARRL, and don't know why.


I can tell you for sure that back around 1991, they literally saved 
my butt through the volunteer counsel program. I had an excellent 
attorney, Jim Hayne himself attended the legal proceedings, and the 
folks who sued me over my antenna walked away with their tail between 
their legs. It didn't cost me one red cent.


73,
Mike, W5UC

At 10:05 PM 3/14/2007, you wrote:
Double BRAVO!!  The ARRL may not always be right about everything, 
but it has done more to promote and sustain ham radio than any other 
organization...


- Original Message - From: Ragnar Otterstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL



BRAVO !!

73  Rag  LA5HE , ARRL life member

My point is that ARRL CHANGED, because the consensus of its members
changed. The ARRL is not them, it's us! If you don't like the
positions taken by your board member, tell him or her, and be
prepared to stand for election next time to see if your views get
accepted.


But despite its imperfections, ARRL represents amateur
radio worldwide (not just in the USA) better than any other
organization, including IARU.

I disagree here !

A particular point of criticism seems to be the DXCC branch, and the
way it deals with DXpeditions and potential new DXCC Entities. As a
member of the DX Advisory Committee, I'd agree that some of the
executive decisions appear on occasion to be arbitrary (7O1YGF, BS7H,
etc).

Remember, this is only a  game !!!

But for better or worse there are some key threads which
explain most of them: Take the long-term view; Support governments
and national amateur radio organizations; And above all try not to
risk the integrity of the #1 award in ham radio (memories of Romeo
still hurt!).

So, when you bash ARRL and especially DXCC, expect me to tune out folks.

73, John, NT5C.




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org





Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.11/721 - Release Date: 
3/13/2007 4:51 PM


age  treachery will overcome youth  skill
http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/w5uc/ 

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org

RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-15 Thread LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad
This might be appropriate if it was true.

Please show one published poll in QST where the membership was polled and 
the results mandated  ARRL to get rid of, or minimize the code test.



ARRL is practising what we call representaive democracy, ie.  people are
elected  to decide on our behalf.
This is just like in politics !
You may not like what your politicians are deciding , but you have to stick
with it untill next election !
Same thing with national societies like ARRL.

73   Rag LA5HE ARRL life member ( although not even having lived over
there ! )






Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.orgattachment: winmail.dat

Re: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-15 Thread Bill Rinker

Jerry:  Well said.  Bill, NE9Z in Wyoming

- Original Message - 
From: Jerry Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL


Double BRAVO!!  The ARRL may not always be right about everything, but it 
has done more to promote and sustain ham radio than any other 
organization... certainly in this country and maybeworldwide as well.  The 
ARRL has been one of the first and foremost, and has been a model for the 
national amateur radio organizations of many other countries.  Everyone's 
entitled to an opinion, but I'm really, really tired of seeing the ARRL 
run down all the time. I have no doubt whatsoever that there would be no 
ham

radio in this country without the ARRL.

73, Jerry K3BZ

- Original Message - 
From: Ragnar Otterstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL



BRAVO !!

73  Rag  LA5HE , ARRL life member




My point is that ARRL CHANGED, because the consensus of its members
changed. The ARRL is not them, it's us! If you don't like the
positions taken by your board member, tell him or her, and be
prepared to stand for election next time to see if your views get
accepted.


But despite its imperfections, ARRL represents amateur
radio worldwide (not just in the USA) better than any other
organization, including IARU.

I disagree here !

A particular point of criticism seems to be the DXCC branch, and the
way it deals with DXpeditions and potential new DXCC Entities. As a
member of the DX Advisory Committee, I'd agree that some of the
executive decisions appear on occasion to be arbitrary (7O1YGF, BS7H,
etc).

Remember, this is only a  game !!!

But for better or worse there are some key threads which
explain most of them: Take the long-term view; Support governments
and national amateur radio organizations; And above all try not to
risk the integrity of the #1 award in ham radio (memories of Romeo
still hurt!).

So, when you bash ARRL and especially DXCC, expect me to tune out folks.

73, John, NT5C.




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org





Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org





Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-14 Thread Ragnar Otterstad
BRAVO !!

73  Rag  LA5HE , ARRL life member




My point is that ARRL CHANGED, because the consensus of its members 
changed. The ARRL is not them, it's us! If you don't like the 
positions taken by your board member, tell him or her, and be 
prepared to stand for election next time to see if your views get 
accepted. 


But despite its imperfections, ARRL represents amateur 
radio worldwide (not just in the USA) better than any other 
organization, including IARU.

I disagree here !

A particular point of criticism seems to be the DXCC branch, and the 
way it deals with DXpeditions and potential new DXCC Entities. As a 
member of the DX Advisory Committee, I'd agree that some of the 
executive decisions appear on occasion to be arbitrary (7O1YGF, BS7H, 
etc). 

Remember, this is only a  game !!!

But for better or worse there are some key threads which 
explain most of them: Take the long-term view; Support governments 
and national amateur radio organizations; And above all try not to 
risk the integrity of the #1 award in ham radio (memories of Romeo 
still hurt!).

So, when you bash ARRL and especially DXCC, expect me to tune out folks.

73, John, NT5C.




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.orgattachment: winmail.dat

RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-14 Thread john

This might be appropriate if it was true.

Please show one published poll in QST where the membership was polled and 
the results mandated  ARRL to get rid of, or minimize the code test.


Answer: (there were none)

There were multiple polls both on-line and otherwise, that showed exactly 
the opposite. I had this exchange about 3 years ago with Mr Haynie, who 
also could only produce membership polls that showed strong support for 
retaining the code test.


Likewise the recent proposal to micromanage  band allocation by 
mode/bandwidth. It was NOT supported by the membership, or anyone else 
other than the WinLink folks, yet it had the strong support of the ARRL.


John K5MO



My point is that ARRL CHANGED, because the consensus of its members
changed.




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




Re: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL

2007-03-14 Thread Jerry Keller
Double BRAVO!!  The ARRL may not always be right about everything, but it 
has done more to promote and sustain ham radio than any other 
organization... certainly in this country and maybeworldwide as well.  The 
ARRL has been one of the first and foremost, and has been a model for the 
national amateur radio organizations of many other countries.  Everyone's 
entitled to an opinion, but I'm really, really tired of seeing the ARRL run 
down all the time. I have no doubt whatsoever that there would be no ham

radio in this country without the ARRL.

73, Jerry K3BZ

- Original Message - 
From: Ragnar Otterstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 6:35 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] The ARRL



BRAVO !!

73  Rag  LA5HE , ARRL life member




My point is that ARRL CHANGED, because the consensus of its members
changed. The ARRL is not them, it's us! If you don't like the
positions taken by your board member, tell him or her, and be
prepared to stand for election next time to see if your views get
accepted.


But despite its imperfections, ARRL represents amateur
radio worldwide (not just in the USA) better than any other
organization, including IARU.

I disagree here !

A particular point of criticism seems to be the DXCC branch, and the
way it deals with DXpeditions and potential new DXCC Entities. As a
member of the DX Advisory Committee, I'd agree that some of the
executive decisions appear on occasion to be arbitrary (7O1YGF, BS7H,
etc).

Remember, this is only a  game !!!

But for better or worse there are some key threads which
explain most of them: Take the long-term view; Support governments
and national amateur radio organizations; And above all try not to
risk the integrity of the #1 award in ham radio (memories of Romeo
still hurt!).

So, when you bash ARRL and especially DXCC, expect me to tune out folks.

73, John, NT5C.




Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org 





Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org