Bugs item #409730, was updated on 2001-03-19 05:45
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105757&aid=409730&group_id=5757
Category: Core API
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
you'll see that in my FileIO local file code, I use AxtiveX for IE. I've have
found no way of doing URL downloading from ActiveX without the use of server
side ASP code.
As someone who has gone to great lengths to limit my exposure to crappy
programming languages, I have NO asp experience and do
Other than you complaint about the term DE-EVOLVE, what is your reason
for complaining.
If you can come up with a single reason for not including my patch,
then show me an example that needs the obscure event structure and write
me some code that will allow NS4 to behave like IE and NS6.
As I've
WAIT. Everybody hold still while I take a photo, Pascal is on my side and I
want to be able to remeber this moment for all time. : )
If your iinterested, I'm adding a few more lines to make sure that a 'mouseout'
is triggered is you release the mouse outside the layer. NS6 doesn't seem to
trigg
>Does no one read my posts.
>
>You can add code to get this working in NS4.
I have read them all and think that maybe, just maybe someone might consider
doing it instead of arguing over the fact that it is not provided by default.
If in fact the DynAPI is supposed to be a cross-browser API then
Ah grasshopper, the intention isn't to surrender but find a new avenue of
attack. Think dynamic client javascript interfaces for I/O with XML
translators to Java server-side apps.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Emberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Marc
Raymond Smith wrote:
> Just so you know client Java will require a plug-in DL (6 mb) with the
> advent of IE6. War of the Worlds beginnings soon related to Server-Side
> domination. I would advise strongly against deploying "any" client side
> Java.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ric
yes, and we're very glad you shared it with us ;)
Pascal Bestebroer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dynamic-core.net
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Eytan Heidingsfeld
> Verzonden: maandag 19 maart 2001 20:48
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Just so you know client Java will require a plug-in DL (6 mb) with the
advent of IE6. War of the Worlds beginnings soon related to Server-Side
domination. I would advise strongly against deploying "any" client side
Java.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Emberson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why don't you just simply post the code?
Add your code to the original patch here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305757&aid=408996&group_id=
5757
if you want anyone to comment on it.
Nothing hard about that.
- Original Message -
From: "Eytan Heidingsfeld" <[EMAIL PROT
Does no one read my posts.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
You can add code to get this working in NS4.
I haven't researched to find out if this can be done yet, and I have not had enough
time to figure out all the inner workings of Dynapi yet, but I wonder if this would be
possible.
Trap the mouse up event in Netscape(just the event, not the coordinates NS gives you),
and then see if you can fi
I am working on the same thing and after much culling I have the following
test file:
URL Load
content = " \
MyalertCnt=0; \
Myalert=function(s){ \
s=(MyalertCnt++)+' '+s; \
alert(s); \
} \
\
function BASE(){ \
} \
BASE.prototype.getClass=function(){ \
return 'BASE'; \
Hello, all!
I am very interested in using this technique that Michael Pemberton has
developed, however, I am having difficulty and was wondering if Michael (or
anyone) would be so kind as to get me pointed on the right track?
Here is my code which uses Michael's setURL() technique:
=
So I guess we will just have to remove Cross-Browser
and call it a "Library". If you want page
transitions, add them to your own code. But the
DynAPI is a "cross-browser" library, as such, it is an
api that allows your code to work the same in several
browsers. So adding features for every new
That's not a valid argument at all.
It's actually not even applicable.
DynAPI is a cross-browser
API for DHTML
ns2 and ie3 does NOT support DHTML!!!
However
at some point in the future I'm sure that ns4.xx will be
considered obsolete, and that should be taken into consideration, to
http://www.shireyproductions.com/dynapi/matrix/default.htm
Here's one for this argument then.
If we are saying that we will DE-EVOLVE all browsers to support a single
browser then why not DE-EVOLVE the whole thing so it supports everything from
NS 2.0 and IE 3.0 and up? This is the logic that we are using right?
I know, I know, I can hear the argument
I lost the URL and couldn't find it in the archive.
8an
(compatibility matrix)
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
But we could right 3 lines of code and get this to work the same with NN 4.
8an
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
so we agree, that we should add this functionality as extra code, but by
default the browsers should work the same (note the cross-browser part of
the API's reason for existing).
Then in my opinion it would be best to make sure the API works the same
cross-browser, and then we can always add extr
Either way you can't just dismiss
certain functionalities just because browser x does not
support them. Weather they are 'add-ons' or not.
Ie; I would like those using IE to see page transitions..
those using NS would not see the page transitions, but the
site wouldn't just not work for them eith
hmm.. I seem to remember a discussion a couple of weeks ago where I asked
why we we're still supporting old browsers as they are holding the dynapi
back.. everyone was all for keeping support for the old browsers (those 2%
of users is SO important).
The ideas that then spawned where to add suppor
If the API begins supporting functions that one browser has that the rest
don't it will no longer be a cross browser API. Maybe you should start an
IEAPI, then you can play poker with both arms, but you will never be allowed
to play with one armed men.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
So, If I decide I'm going to play poker with a one-armed man,
I should cut one of my arms off?
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Mouse Events in IE
> it may sound like
Bugs item #409730, was updated on 2001-03-19 05:45
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105757&aid=409730&group_id=5757
Category: Core API
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
26 matches
Mail list logo
