Define names were accidently transposed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_82598.c
index 6321b05..2f38e84 100644
EEPROM access beyond the base eeprom page is unsupported.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c b/drivers
From: PJ Waskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update the NAPI implementation to use the new napi_struct infrstructure.
This removes the need of multiple net_device structs to implement a
multiqueue NAPI.
Signed-off-by: PJ Waskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED
From: Jeb Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add DCA support in the similar method that it was added to the ixgbe
driver recently. DCA allows the network device to put data in the
CPU cache and notify the chipset of that event. This reduces cache
misses during receives.
Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer [EMAIL
From: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c
index 27fca76
From: Alexander Duyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Updates the suspend and resume to better handle the possibility of MSIX
vector changes.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/igb/igb_main.c | 46
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Vlad Seliverstov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Recently, I moved my heavily network-loaded server under Ubuntu Hardy to a
box with two 80003ES2LAN onboard NICs and began to experience problems with
it. The problem is huge packet loss time to time.
Here are
2008/8/5 刘磊 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you, I will check again.
And the follow is the changes I had made.
static int e1000_ipv4(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct e1000_ring *tx_ring = adapter-tx_ring;
struct e1000_context_desc *context_desc;
struct
Add a bool IGB_DCA defined to y if IGB and DCA are enabled, but IGB isn't y
while DCA=m. And thus remove the need to select INTEL_IOATDMA when IGB is
enabled, so that non-x86 architectures can build the igb driver.
Based on work/patch from Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jeff
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Irwin Estes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that e1000e release 0.4.1.12 is out is there any word about the
when the patch for IPMI will be released, and what method will be used?
I apologize, we have a patch which I have not pushed to the kernel. I
will work on
Added e1000-devel mailing list (again), please reply-to-all next time.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what other devices do you have on the PCI bus? Since there are different
versions of this part having a device ID here in the discussion would
help. Also, you
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Vladimir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using E1000 driver 7.6.15 that enables multiqueueing by CONFIG_E1000_MQ.
However, there are some patches required for kernel also since compilation
erros with CONFIG_E1000_MQ set.
Could you help me how and
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hiroki Ohashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I faced the following situations.
The LED of NIC was indicated, even when the system was not linked
the network (auto-negotiation failed or link partner cannot
auto-negotiate).
LED
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:31 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:58:07 -0800
During a reset, releasing the swflag after it failed to be acquired would
cause a double unlock of the mutex. Instead, test whether
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Wu Fengguang fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to report one e1000e warning. I've been running 2.6.28-rcX for a long
time and it's the first appearance of this (debug) message:
[14100.898939] :00:19.0: eth0: Link is Down
[14102.896362]
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Luke Zhang (luzhan) luz...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a kernel panic and would like to see if it is some known
issue . I checked the sourceforge pages but can't find the changelog.
Where can I find the change log and issues fixed for the e1000 driver?
63072 4 mptspi,mptctl,mptsas,mptscsih
e1000e115492 0
igb 105880 0
mv_sata81804 18
-Original Message-
From: tar...@gmail.com [mailto:tar...@gmail.com
mailto:tar...@gmail.com ] On Behalf Of Jeff Kirsher
Sent: Wednesday, December 24
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Luke Zhang (luzhan) luz...@cisco.com wrote:
Here you go...
old bootloader convention, maybe loadlin?
Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/ram ramdisk_size=15
ramdisk_start=0x600 console=ttyS0,9600n8)
start kernel
Linux version 2.6.10
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:07 PM, 刘磊 orphen.lei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all:
I have an intel 82571EB NIC, and it support 2Tx, 2Rx queues.
I want to use the multi queue feature, but there is no
CONFIG_NETDEVICES_MULTIQUEUE in the e1000e driver.
Is the e1000e driver NOT need to set
people to do the
upgrade :-)
-- Luke
-Original Message-
From: tar...@gmail.com [mailto:tar...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Kirsher
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 5:50 PM
To: Luke Zhang (luzhan)
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] E1000 change log
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:25:15 +0100 Andreas Mohr a...@lisas.de wrote:
Hi,
Adrian Bunk (1):
The overdue eepro100 removal.
That would be a rather pronounced NAK then? (sorry ;)
(reason: rendering my web
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:34 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:20:24 -0800
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Date: Tue, 30
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Doug Bazarnic ker...@bazarnic.net wrote:
Asus P5k, Intel Q9450, 8gb ram, x86_64, running 2.6.28. The on board eth0
atl1 never has a problem, only eth1 intel e1000, plugged into a pci slot.
On a couple of machines, the way I got it to stop, was to use 8.0.6
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Luke Zhang (luzhan) luz...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Does these latest 8.x e1000 driver suppose to work with kernel 2.6.10?
Or is there some minimum kernel version required?
I am thinking of upgrade my e1000 driver from 7.2.7 to the latest.
Thanks.
-- Luke
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Andre Detsch adet...@br.ibm.com wrote:
When running ethtool -t on an interface that was just
brought down, the link test was failing. That's because
we need to perform a reset on the interface to be able
to check the link status correctly. There is no problem
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:08 AM, André Detsch adet...@br.ibm.com wrote:
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
I guess this comes down to what the definition of a Link test should
be doing. My $0.02 is that it should be testing if the interface has
a link, in which case if you ifdown the interface before
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Zils, Stephan stephan.z...@eads.com wrote:
Hello,
my name ist Stephan Zils and I'm a System-Ingenieer at
EADS in Germany. We have a problem with the e100 Linux driver.
From time to time, the driver will be restartet. See following kernel msg:
NETDEV
is necessary when there are multiple
boards, or 1000's of vlans.
Ah, gotcha. Clears up my questions.
Acked-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr peter.p.waskiewicz...@intel.com
--
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Dave - feel free to apply this patch when you take the first patch
2009/3/24 Stack Stack i.am.st...@gmail.com:
Hello!
I have a few problems with my Intel Gigabit card. I was hoping someone could
help. I am not subscribed to the list but I am following the list online
[5].
I had been running 32 bit Debian Etch with my Intel Gigabit network card for
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Myron Stowe myron.st...@hp.com wrote:
During boot, the igb driver shows the following message(s) for each NIC:
igb :05:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection
igb :05:00.0: eth0: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:unknown) 00:23:7d:45:80:6f
igb :05:00.0:
2009/3/24 Stack Stack i.am.st...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.comwrote:
The kernel version of e1000 is what you should be using if you have a
kernel version 2.6.28 or newer (since 2.6.29 just got released).
We keep the stand-alone driver
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com wrote:
GCC warns:
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c: In function 'ixgbe_sfp_config_module_task':
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:3920: warning: suggest parentheses around
operand of '!' or change '' to '' or '!' to '~'
Which I
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
casca...@holoscopio.com wrote:
After experimenting with kexec with the last merges after 2.6.29, I've
had some problems when probing e100. It would not read the eeprom. After
some bisects, I realized this has been like that since
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
casca...@holoscopio.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46:19PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
casca...@holoscopio.com wrote:
After experimenting with kexec
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Breno Leitao
lei...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
According to the PCI Error Recovery document, if after a recovery, the
bus is disabled, the error_detected function should return
PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT. Actually ixgbe error_detected function is
always
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Breno Leitao
lei...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch removes some assignment that are not necessary. Since the ret
variable is declared as false during its initialization, it makes no sense to
reassign false to it again.
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer h...@comx.dk wrote:
Hardware RX fifo overruns for the 82576 is stored in the
RNBC (Receive No Buffers Count) register.
I choose the store the RNBC value in net_stats.rx_fifo_errors.
Saving the stats in dev-net_stats makes it visible via
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer h...@comx.dk wrote:
The following patchset address drop stats counters in the igb
driver (chips 82576 and 82575). The drop stats addressed here
are due to the OS cannot keep up.
I have only tested it for the 82576 chip, as my (12 port)
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer h...@comx.dk wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:43 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
Jesper - I have pulled in your patches, and made the necessary
modifications based on Mitch's comments. Right now, they are in
testing and I should be pushing
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Hemminger
shemmin...@vyatta.com wrote:
The e1000e driver has three forms of interrupt handling for transmit
completions: msi-x, msi and legacy mode. In msi and legacy mode, tx
completion is managed via the receive NAPI routine, but msi-x mode
transmit
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Hemminger
shemmin...@vyatta.com wrote:
The e1000e driver has three forms of interrupt handling for transmit
completions: msi-x, msi and legacy mode. In msi and legacy mode
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
e1000e_config_collision_dist() sets tctl, but subsequently
tctl is overwritten. It seems to me that as things stand
the call to e1000e_config_collision_dist() has no effect and
should either be removed or moved down a
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:20 AM, David Millerda...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Chris Wright chr...@sous-sol.org
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:11:51 -0700
DMA buffer is mapped w/ NET_IP_ALIGN accounted, unmapped w/out.
Dma debugging generates this warning. Simple fix below.
[ 76.356509] ixgbe
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 02:36, Xiaotian Fengdf...@redhat.com wrote:
commit 111b9dc5 introduces pcie aer support for e1000e, but it is not
reasonable to disable it in e1000_remove but enable it in e1000_resume.
This patch enables aer support in e1000_probe.
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 14:28, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
Tim Gardner wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Fix PCIE error message
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436370
The error returned by pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() is ignored, so
print a notice instead of an error.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 14:31, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday 02 October 2009, Nix wrote:
On 1 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki stated:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:34, Theodore Tso ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 03:13:07PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/50277/
Most likely because it's not in the Linus' tree yet.
[e1000e maintainers, we have a regression
2009/11/3 Naohiro Ooiwa noo...@miraclelinux.com:
Jeff Kirsher wrote:
2009/10/31 Naohiro Ooiwa noo...@miraclelinux.com:
I have added this patch to my tree for testing. This patch requires a
fair amount of regression testing, so once its passed testing I will
push the patch to David/netdev
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:31, Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't use the sizeof the pointer to clear the result
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com
---
drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
-
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 22:32, Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au wrote:
Move virtual finction cleanup code into igb_cleanup_vf() and for the sake
of symmetry rename igb_probe_vfs() as igb_init_vf().
Although these functions aren't entirely symmetrical it should aid
maintenance by making the
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 07:59, Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:24:02PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Hi Neil,
Neil Horman wrote:
Update e1000 driver to not allow dma beyond the end of the allocated skb
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 08:02, Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
Sorry to reply to myself, but given the comments regarding the e1000 driver, I
should take the same changes into account here. New version of the patch,
much
cleaner than previously.
Update e1000e driver to not allow
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:02, Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
The variables count and i are unsigned so the (|=) 0 tests do not work.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin roel.kl...@gmail.com
---
Found using coccinelle: http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
This should be all with this pattern.
As
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:10, Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com wrote:
Hey all-
A security discussion was recently given:
http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/Fahrplan//events/3596.en.html
And a patch that I submitted awhile back was brought up. Apparently some of
their testing
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 03:44, Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org wrote:
Check for error return from pci_map_single/pci_map_page and clean up.
With this and the previous patch the driver was able to handle a significant
percentage of errors (I set the fault injection rate to 10% and could still
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 19:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Terry Loftin terry.lof...@hp.com
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:01:52 -0600
Tx ring buffers after tx_ring-next_to_use are volatile and could
change, possibly causing a crash. Stop cleaning when we hit
tx_ring-next_to_use.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:06, Koki Sanagi sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Previous patch has some mail format problem.
Maybe I've fixed and re-sent.
There is no need to increment nr_frags becasue skb_fill_page_desc increments
it.
Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
2010/4/15 Koki Sanagi sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com:
There is no need to increment nr_frags becasue skb_fill_page_desc increments
it.
Signed-off-by: Koki Sanagi sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/net/igbvf/netdev.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Thanks I
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 17:46, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote:
There appears to be an off-by-1 defect in the maximum packet size
copied when copybreak is speified in these modules.
The copybreak module params are specified as:
Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on
IXGBE_ERR_blah instead and there is another
spot where this could be used. Instead I propose this patch
instead...
ixgbe: return IXGBE_ERR_RAR_INDEX when out of range
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Based on patch from Shirley Ma x...@us.ibm.com
Return IXGBE_ERR_RAR_INDEX when RAR index
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:55, Shirley Ma mashi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
When SRIOV is enabled, if we create macvlan on PF and load the VF driver in
host
domain, when macvlan/PF and VF interfaces are all up, the macvlan incoming
network
traffics are directed to VF interface not PF interface.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 23:29, Joe Perches j...@perches.com wrote:
commit 675ad47375c76a7c3be4ace9554d92cd55518ced
removed the capability to use ethtool.set_msglevel to
control the types of messages emitted by the driver.
That commit should probably be reverted.
If not, then this patch
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 00:12, Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:07:51 -0700
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:35:25 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:38:09 PDT, a...@linux-foundation.org said:
are trying to fix is still an
issue with the latest upstream kernel?
Cheers,
Jeff Kirsher
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 15:34, Sonny Rao sonny...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This patch is similar to what was fixed in ixgbe in this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=e1000-develm=126593062701537w=3
We should add read memory barriers to all the similar cases across the
Intel ethernet driver family. In the
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 15:44, Sonny Rao sonny...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Add missing memory barriers to clean_rx_irq functions in Intel Drivers
This patch is similar to what was fixed in ixgbe in this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=e1000-develm=126593062701537w=3
We should add read memory barriers
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 15:46, Sonny Rao sonny...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:41:46PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 15:34, Sonny Rao sonny...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This patch is similar to what was fixed in ixgbe in this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=e1000
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 16:05, Sonny Rao sonny...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:45:42PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
You also seem to be missing igb.
This patch is similar to what was fixed in ixgbe in this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=e1000-develm=126593062701537w=3
We should
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:05, Dan Carpenter erro...@gmail.com wrote:
The e_dev_err() macro dereferences adapter which is NULL here.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter erro...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 20:34, David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
I'll let the Intel folks integrate these 3 patches.
Thanks Joe.
--
Thanks Joe, I have added the patches to my queue.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
Sell
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:10, Kyle Moffett kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com wrote:
The Intel 82571EB chipset can be used in an unmanaged configuration as a
fast dual-port Gig-E controller. Unfortunately a board constructed that
way would fail to correctly come up because the driver polls for the
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:32, Flavio Leitner fleit...@redhat.com wrote:
Provides accurate stats at the time user reads them.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner fleit...@redhat.com
---
drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 5 ++-
drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c | 27 +---
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:31, Flavio Leitner fleit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:29:33PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 18:32 -0200, Flavio Leitner a écrit :
Provides accurate stats at the time user reads them.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:09, Stefan Assmann sassm...@kpanic.de wrote:
Some cleanups for igb.
First patch is just a simple typo fix.
Second patch turns igb_update_nvm_checksum and igb_validate_nvm_checksum
into wrapper functions to deduplicate code.
Third patch puts the thermal sensor code
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:16, Flavio Leitner fleit...@redhat.com wrote:
Just move the unlock down a bit because it unlocks too
early leaving a chance for get_stats64() run in parallel
while it is still accessing the stats.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner fleit...@redhat.com
---
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 09:24, Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com wrote:
Anthony,
I'm now upstream maintainer for ethtool so I've picked up your patch
again.
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 00:32 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Package: ethtool
Version: 1:2.6.33-1
Severity: wishlist
The M88
2011/5/7 Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl:
As all drivers are converted, we may now remove discrete offload setting
callback handling.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław mirq-li...@rere.qmqm.pl
---
Note: This needs to wait for Intel guys to finish conversion of their
LAN drivers.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 04:52, Esa-Pekka Pyokkimies
esa-pekka.pyokkim...@stonesoft.com wrote:
Hello!
I noticed that ixgbe driver doesn't report SUPPORTED_Pause and
ADVERTISED_Pause flags to ethtool. This means that ethtool
always reports:
Supported pause frame use: No
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 07:17, Martin Wilck martin.wi...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
WOL fails on second port of a i350 network adapter with the latest
upstream kernel driver. It works with the sf.net driver 3.0.19. The
following patch seems to be missing upstream.
Regards,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:41, martin_zielin...@mcafee.com wrote:
Hello,
With a 82559EB card a customer often comes into the situation that no packet
can be received anymore until network restart.
The symptom is that the rx_missed_errors register counts each packet but no
more packets can
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 00:23, J.Hwan Kim frog1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everyone
How can I distribute the packets according to destination MAC address
into multi-virtual fucntion queue?
Now, my setting is that all bit of PFUTA are '1' and ROPE bit is 1,
so all mac packet is duplicated to all
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 05:05, Indira ramasamy vel.ind...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using e1000e driver(version: 0.4.1.12-NAPI, firmware-version: 5.10-2)
. In dmesg I am seeing
:00:19.0: eth0: Detected Tx Unit Hang:
TDH b7
TDT a3
next_to_use
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:29 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
ASPM on the 82574 causes trouble. Currently the driver disables L0s
for
this NIC but only disables L1 if the MTU is 1500. This patch simply
causes L1 to be disabled regardless of the MTU setting.
Signed-off-by: Chris Boot
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:29 +0100, Chris Boot wrote:
For the 82573, ASPM L1 gets disabled wholesale so this special-case
code
is not required. For the 82574 the previous patch does the same as for
the 82573, disabling L1 on the adapter. Thus, this code is no longer
required and can be
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:42 -0700, Prasanna Panchamukhi wrote:
On 04/26/2012 05:20 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote:
From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhippanchamu...@riverbed.com
Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs ports
On 04/26/2012 05:05 PM, prasanna.panchamu...@riverbed.com wrote:
From: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi ppanchamu...@riverbed.com
Following logs where seen on Systems with multiple NICs ports,
while using MSI interrupts as shown below:
Feb 16 15:09:32 (none) user.notice kernel: :00:0d.0: lan0_0:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 16:58 +0800, Shan Wei wrote:
From: Samuel Liao samuell...@tencent.com
Maybe it's a typo, but it cause that igbvf can't be initialized
successfully.
Set perm_addr value using valid dev_addr, although which is equal to
hw.mac.addr.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Liao
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:08 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 05/01/2012 02:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greeargree...@candelatech.com
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 14:10:43 -0700
On 04/20/2012 02:56 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 04/20/2012 02:21 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
Thanks John for pointers
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 18:46 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:42:28 -0700
I will take care of the stable submission's Ben.
Actually, Jeff, hold off on that.
I misread Ben's email and didn't see that these were
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 13:46 +0800, Miller Liu wrote:
Hi Jefferey:
Need your help again.
Could you please help to look into this?
It appears 82579LM is not recognized in SLES 11.1 64bit Network
Settings.
But if I use lspci command, 82579LM can be displayed.
I will try the 1.10.6 to
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 08:45 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The code seems to want to look at the last byte where the HW puts some
information. Since the skb-data area is never seen by the HW I guess
it
does not work as expected. We pass the page address to the HW so I
*think* in
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:42 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
This is another fixup where the data is not transfered into buffer
addressed by skb-data but into a page.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de
---
Jeff, I just noticed it. Again, now HW here. Feel
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:57 +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
commit ca3ccc6835943287b6f69e973c126a02bc4de409
Author: ethan.zhao ethan.ker...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Jun 6 07:32:11 2012 -0700
modified: drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
While e1000e_check_options() is called,
On 06/07/2012 02:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Jeff Kirsher tar...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:38:17 -0700
Thanks! I have applied the patch to my queue
Why?
My impression is that this is a patch already in the tree, and it's
being submitted for -stable but such minor performance
cleaning tx in e1000_clean_tx_irq use the values in the associated
buffer_info for statistics counting, this eliminates cache misses
on skb fields.
Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson dnel...@redhat.com
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: David
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 10:04 +0200, Daniel Forrer wrote:
Hi Everyone
Is there a senior network programmer around, which maybe can help us?
We are running an old Linux Kernel 2.4.4 with some RTLinux extension
and we
have to migrate this system to a new hardware, equipped with Intels
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 10:58 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The code to pad packets here is the same effective code as
the existing inline function skb_padto(). There is a minor
performance gain since skb_padto() also uses unlikely().
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger shemmin...@vyatta.com
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 11:55 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The check here is bogus. Since len is unsigned, it can never
be negative. And it would be a bug in network stack to ever
send a zero length packet to device.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger shemmin...@vyatta.com
Thanks, I have
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 16:31 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
The check for length = 0 is bogus because length is unsigned, and
network
stack never sends zero length packets (unless it is totally broken).
The check for really small packets can be optimized (using unlikely)
and calling skb_pad
On 07/05/2012 04:53 PM, D. Stussy wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote in message
news:jjgoo-7l0...@gated-at.bofh.it...
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012, D. Stussy wrote:
There has been some changes to the driver such that things like
checksum verification is offloaded from the CPU. However, this
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
