Hi,
I agree. Climate change comes as a package of various factors and should be
viewed as such.
We should not look at it in a reductionist view. A reductionist view would
be wrong regarding science and
gives deniers a platform to point out certain events. Just my two cents.
Best,
Moritz
2012/4
MARTIN . . .
Thanks for your note. I don't think I said that the warmer-than-usual spring is
a result of global warming. ;-)
By saying "Curmudgeonly humans may deny climate change is upon us, but watching
and listening to Mother Nature leads us to the truth" I'm suggesting we collect
the evid
Hi, Bill H. and Ecologers:
I accept the scientific evidence that global warming is occurirng,
but I think we should be careful about pointing to various
warmer-than-usual events and saying, "Aha, evidence for global warming!" I
don't think doing so is statistically valid, and here's an an
The month of March 2012 was incredibly warm--both day and night--and Mother
Nature seemed to respond. Plants and animals of various species showed activity
ahead of what the calendar usually dictates, so there may be some long-term
effects. To view our photo essay about this phenomenon and some
