Can someone help me with commit of this patch?
-Original Message-
From: Ye, Ting [mailto:ting...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 6:57 AM
To: Hegde, Nagaraj P; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] NetworkPkg: HttpDxe: Address double FreePool issue
Looks good to
I will help to commit the patch. Thanks for the reminder.
Thanks,
Ting
-Original Message-
From: Hegde, Nagaraj P [mailto:nagaraj-p.he...@hpe.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 2:09 PM
To: Ye, Ting; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] NetworkPkg: HttpDxe: Address double
Hi Carl,
Could you let me know your environment info, os info, etc. actually I can't
reproduce the issue. So please help me to reproduce it, thanks.
Best Regards,
Zhu Yonghong
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Miller,
Carl H
Sunny,
You could move the two FreePool (FullInstance) to one place
which is under the LocateDevicePath() call to make the change smaller a bit.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: Wang, Sunny (HPS SW) [mailto:sunnyw...@hpe.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 6:21 PM
Sunny,
I don't like to add a library interface as a short term fix. I will provide a
patch next week to enable platform recovery (We are still working on OS
recovery) so that you don't need PlatformBootManagerDefaultBootFail() interface.
Thanks,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel
Signed-off-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
---
MdeModulePkg/Include/Library/HttpLib.h | 43 ++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Include/Library/HttpLib.h
b/MdeModulePkg/Include/Library/HttpLib.h
index
Add a DEBUG statement when the number of PEI perf log entries
exceeds PcdMaxPeiPerformanceLogEntries
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
---
MdeModulePkg/Library/PeiPerformanceLib/PeiPerformanceLib.c | 2 ++
1
Signed-off-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
---
MdeModulePkg/Library/PeiPerformanceLib/PeiPerformanceLib.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/PeiPerformanceLib/PeiPerformanceLib.c
Reviewed-by: Jaben Carsey
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 4:08 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Tian, Feng ; Samer
Add common HTTP definitions for use in HTTP clients/applications.
List includes: HTTP methods, request/response headers, and encodings.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
---
Hi Ray,
Yes, I think OS/Platform recovery feature can meet our requirement.
However, OS/Platform recovery feature has not yet been completely implemented,
so we would like to have a short-term solution for this.
Just like Samer said, if you are OK with introducing a new StatusCode in either
Dear SecurityPkg maintainer,
I'm trying to track down the best way for platform policy to handle an
authentication failure in the PEI Rsa2048Sha256 guided section extraction
library and ran across this curious state near the end of
Rsa2048Sha256GuidedSectionHandler.
//
// Temp solution
A subset of fields in the EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2 structure are identical
to the fields in the SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT structure. CopyMem() is used to
transfer the contents of the SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT structure into the
EFI_SMM_SYSTEM_TABLE2. This is confusing because SMM_ENTRY_CONTEXT is
not used in the
On 10/30/15 14:04, Janusz Mocek wrote:
> W dniu 30.10.2015 o 13:26, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>> CC'ing Xiao and Alex again.
>>
>> On 10/29/15 19:39, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-29 04:45:37, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 10/29/15 02:32, Jordan Justen wrote:
> +ASSERT (MaxProcessors > 0);
On 10/30/15 13:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuMp.c b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuMp.c
>> index 3f56faa..e7f5b41 100644
>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuMp.c
>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuMp.c
>> @@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ ApEntryPointInC (
>>VOID* TopOfApStack;
>>
CC'ing Xiao and Alex again.
On 10/29/15 19:39, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2015-10-29 04:45:37, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 10/29/15 02:32, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> +ASSERT (MaxProcessors > 0);
>>> +PcdSet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber, MaxProcessors);
>>
>> I think that when this branch
Yes, first, thanks the great analysis from Laszlo.
Is that possible to eliminate the assumption by parsing current GDT entry?
Instead of hardcode 0x38 or 0x28, if PiSmmCpu inherits GDT from other module,
should it parse GDT to get correct long mode segment?
I do not object the idea to change
Jiewen,
Yes. That is a longer term goal for the PiSmmCpuDxeSmm. Making the GDTs
consistent helps debug and is a fix that works until we can add logic to
PiSmmCpuiDxeSmm to inherit current GDT information and use it throughout this
module.
Thanks,
Mike
>-Original Message-
>From:
Hi Ray,
Many thanks for this.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:53:54AM +, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Ok I will revert the two patches I committed (big patch + small
> patch). But I want to clarify one thing that not every big patch can
> be easily understood by just splitting to small patches.
Certainly,
The PiSmmCpuDxeSmm module is using PcdFrameworkCompatibilitySupport to
provide compatibility with the SMM support in the IntelFrameworkPkg.
This change removes the Framework compatibility and requires all SMM
modules that provide SMI handlers to follow the PI Specification.
Contributed-under:
20 matches
Mail list logo