On 02/20/18 19:02, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> I do not agree with this change.
>
> If the PCDs that describe the UART are for a UART
> that is owned by the FW and hidden from the OS, then
> this lib can work well at runtime.
Does that imply that we should do the runtime disablement in the
I do not agree with this change.
If the PCDs that describe the UART are for a UART
that is owned by the FW and hidden from the OS, then
this lib can work well at runtime.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 9:00 AM
On 02/20/18 15:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:05:24AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> BaseDebugLibSerialPort is not suitable for use by DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER
>> modules, so blacklist it for use by such modules.
>>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:05:24AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> BaseDebugLibSerialPort is not suitable for use by DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER
> modules, so blacklist it for use by such modules.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
BaseDebugLibSerialPort is not suitable for use by DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER
modules, so blacklist it for use by such modules.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel
---
5 matches
Mail list logo