>
>Eugene
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kinney, Michael D [mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:54 PM
>To: Cohen, Eugene <eug...@hp.com>; Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>;
>Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>;
Cohen, Eugene <eug...@hp.com>;
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: RE: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
Eugene:
Another idea is to update FV HOB to include authentication status instead of
adding FV HOB3. The consumer code can check FV HOB Length to know whe
Behalf Of Cohen,
>Eugene
>Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 7:12 AM
>To: Gao, Liming; Zeng, Star; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
>
>Liming and Star,
>
>Thanks for the suggestion for extending the FV HOB.
ao, Liming <liming@intel.com>; Zeng,
Star <star.z...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney, Michael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
Eugene,
I believe the current behavior is that only
ay, November 9, 2015 9:03 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
I raised this as an issue with PIWG. In the meantime feel free to provide some
historical context for why this hasn't been an issue in other implementations.
Tha
@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Zeng,
> Star
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 6:19 PM
> To: Cohen, Eugene; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
>
> On 2015/11/9 21:57, Cohen, Eugene wrote:
> > Star,
> >
&g
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
I raised this as an issue with PIWG. In the meantime feel free to provide some
historical context for why this hasn't been an issue in other implementations.
Thanks,
Eugene
-Original Me
-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
I raised this as an issue with PIWG. In the meantime feel free to provide some
historical context for why this hasn't been an issue in other implementations.
Thanks,
Eugene
-Original Message
: Friday, November 06, 2015 5:49 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Thompson, Mark L. (Boise IPG) <mark.l.thomp...@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
[Corrected the typos with a new version - proofreading is a good thing]
I'm confused about som
-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Cohen,
Eugene
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 11:12 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Thompson, Mark L. (Boise IPG) <mark.l.thomp...@hp.com>
Subject: [edk2] Authentication status for signed FVs extracted in PEI
I'm confused about something and hop
I'm confused about something and hope I can help some help understanding this.
If we have a signed FV that is extracted in PEI it doesn't look like the
AuthenticationStatus gets propagated to DXE.
The hob doesn't store authentication status and the core products FVB with
AuthenticationStatus
11 matches
Mail list logo
