Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-25 Thread Laszlo Ersek
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 5:10 AM >> To: Lars Kurth ; Julien Grall >> ; Kinney, Michael D >> >> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Ard Biesheuvel >> ; Justen, Jordan L >> ; Anthony Perard >> ; Marc-A

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-22 Thread Kinney, Michael D
9 5:10 AM > To: Lars Kurth ; Julien Grall > ; Kinney, Michael D > > Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Ard Biesheuvel > ; Justen, Jordan L > ; Anthony Perard > ; Marc-André Lureau > ; Stefan Berger > > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > Licens

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-21 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/21/19 13:04, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 20/03/2019, 18:25, "Laszlo Ersek" wrote: > > But, again, this should be discussed in that separate BZ then. > > > >OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenBus.c > > This file is licensed under the BSD license, aka >

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-20 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/20/19 19:42, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 20/03/2019 18:25, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 03/20/19 14:03, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> On 15/03/2019, 17:48, "Lars Kurth" wrote: >>> On 15/03/2019, 10:18, "Julien Grall" wrote: >>> Is the issue that you don’t trust that the license specified

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-20 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 20/03/2019 18:25, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 03/20/19 14:03, Lars Kurth wrote: On 15/03/2019, 17:48, "Lars Kurth" wrote: On 15/03/2019, 10:18, "Julien Grall" wrote: Is the issue that you don’t trust that the license specified in the files are correct? No -- the question is

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-20 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/20/19 14:03, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 15/03/2019, 17:48, "Lars Kurth" wrote: > > > > On 15/03/2019, 10:18, "Julien Grall" wrote: > > > > > EDK2 is converting the full copyright in each file to SDPX > identifier. While the > >

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-20 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/15/19 18:48, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 15/03/2019, 10:18, "Julien Grall" wrote: > > > > > EDK2 is converting the full copyright in each file to SDPX > identifier. While the > > copyright looks like an MIT license, it has never been confirmed. > Andrew

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-19 Thread Leif Lindholm
; From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 10:59 AM > > To: Kinney, Michael D > > Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2- > > de...@lists.01.org > > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > > License &g

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-19 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2019-03-19 12:09:41, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Leif and Jordan, > > Would you mind putting together a specific proposal I would propose adding the exact text from that site into a DeveloperCertificate.txt in the root of the tree. Then reference when documenting how to contribute a patch,

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-19 Thread Kinney, Michael D
ndholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 10:59 AM > To: Kinney, Michael D > Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2- > de...@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > License > > Hi Mike, > > I see where Jordan is

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-19 Thread Leif Lindholm
dan L > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:04 AM > > To: Kinney, Michael D ; > > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > > License > > > > On 2019-03-13 10:54:22, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > &g

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-18 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2019-03-18 11:25:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Hi Jordan, > > No proposed changes to the Signed-off-by tags. I think it's good to continue with the Signed-off-by tags. One slight concerns I have is what Signed-off-by becomes a little vague with your proposed change. Previously it meant that

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-18 Thread Kinney, Michael D
. Best regards, Mike > -Original Message- > From: Justen, Jordan L > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 11:04 AM > To: Kinney, Michael D ; > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > License > > On 2019-03-13 10:54:

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-18 Thread Kinney, Michael D
2019 3:56 AM > To: Kinney, Michael D > Cc: Justen, Jordan L ; edk2- > de...@lists.01.org; Julien Grall > ; Anthony Perard > > Subject: Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent > License > > Hi Mike, > > On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > >

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-15 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Lars, On 15/03/2019 17:04, Lars Kurth wrote: On 15/03/2019, 02:35, "Julien Grall" wrote: Hi Lars, On 14/03/2019 20:04, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > On 14/03/2019, 12:07, "Julien Grall" wrote: > > (+ Lars) > > On 3/14/19 10:55 AM,

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-15 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Lars, On 14/03/2019 20:04, Lars Kurth wrote: On 14/03/2019, 12:07, "Julien Grall" wrote: (+ Lars) On 3/14/19 10:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > (2.2.2) Files that seem to be covered by the MIT license. > >

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-14 Thread Julien Grall
(+ Lars) On 3/14/19 10:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: (2.2.2) Files that seem to be covered by the MIT license. OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-arm/xen.h OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen-x86_32.h

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-14 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2019-03-13 10:54:22, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > > 84141eacac edk2: Remove Contributions.txt and update Readme.md I guess this removes the requirement for the 'Contributed-under' tag in commit messages? But, what about Signed-off-by? Is it desirable to remove that requirement? Relatedly,

Re: [edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-14 Thread Laszlo Ersek
Hi Mike, On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Hello, > > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 > > This change is based on the following emails: > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-February/036260.html >

[edk2] PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-13 Thread Kinney, Michael D
Hello, BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373 This change is based on the following emails: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-February/036260.html https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/030385.html RFCs with detailed process for the license