Hi LiAnna,
That's interesting and nice to hear. It's refreshing to hear good news.
I wish you the best for future iterations of this program.
Thanks,Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
null
___
Education mailing list
> Fellows shared in surveys that they felt encouraged to apply to the program
> because their academic associations see it as aligning with their mission
> to disseminate knowledge to the public; at the end of the pilot,
> participants saw it as professional development in refreshing how to
>
inable, and
> > cost-effective in the medium to long term.
> >
> > Pine
> > ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
> >
> >
> > Original message From: James Salsman <
> jsals...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 5/23/18
m to long term.
>
> Pine
> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
>
>
> Original message From: James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com>
> Date: 5/23/18 7:07 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Wikimedia Education <
> education@lists.wikimedia.org>, Pine W <wiki.p...
/User:Pine )
Original message From: James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com>
Date: 5/23/18 7:07 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Wikimedia Education
<education@lists.wikimedia.org>, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> Subject: Re:
[Wikimedia Education] Evaluation report on Wikipedia F
Pine, why would you be concerned about the cost-effectiveness or
sustainability. This program looks great to me, except for the
mismatch between needs and recruiting.
On that point, there is an alternative to
Hi LiAnna,
Thank you for this report. Increasing the number of good-faith contributors to
Wikipedia is always nice to see. I believe that at least a few people in WMF,
the affiliates, and the long-term volunteer population have been interested for
many years in increasing the number of
Note: I tried to ask some follow-up questions of LiAnna, but the
"filter rules" rejected them somehow.
There is a copy here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/2018-May/006284.html
Best regards,
Jim
___
Education mailing list
Answers inline!
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Juliana Bastos Marques <
domusau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I’d like to add another question. As you and others may know, I work in a
> particularly quarrelsome Wikipedia (PT), where there are lots of reversions
> of edits from newbies, even when
LiAnna, I am very happy to see this.
Would you please describe how you choose the subject matter of
articles and expertise for inviting Fellows?
It's not clear whether the Fellows were paid or otherwise compensated;
were they?
"In the past four years, the Wiki Education Foundation (Wiki
10 matches
Mail list logo
