I have often wondered if the noise from a switching power supply would vary in
intensity or other characteristics as the load changes. For example, during
transmitting. In a single transmitter environment the user would probably not
notice but in a multi-transmitter or SO2R station one just
Yes, it is morse code although the protocol is very different.
For example, to call a distant (unknown) ship you point your big light at them
and send AA. The proper response is a lng T. There’s a book carried
aboard all ships that documents the protocols. I have a copy here
Yes, I was thinking along the same lines — that copper ‘conductive tape’ stuff.
It could be mounted to the outside of the carrier and would look like stylish
racing stripes!
http://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/company-us/all-3m-products/~/3M-Conductive-Copper-Foil-Tape-3313?N=5002385+3293242553=rud
I was one of the last Radio Officers to sail an all CW ship. It was the SS
Tampa Bay, call sign KNJA. We worked our way up and down the South American
coasts from ports in the US gulf coast.
I mainly worked WLO on 16 and 22 MHz. We typically hummed along around 30 WPM
due to the requirement
I agree about getting on the air. And, about the value of the old Novice class
in providing a “safe harbor”.
When I got my novice ticket I went out and bought crystals for various
frequencies on 80, 40 and 15 meters. Frequencies were random and I had three
on 80 meters — 3713, 3723 and 3741.
I used to work Field Day with a friend in the two transmitter class. At our
first Field Day, we had the usual problems as described by the original poster.
Especially so because we were both running 500 watts.
On our second and all subsequent operations we operated with one station on a
Oh boy, here we go again with a KW amp!
;-)
Doug, W7KF
> On Mar 30, 2017, at 14:47, Fred Jensen wrote:
>
> How many watts into a rubber duck for 5 W EIRP?
>
> 73,
>
> Fred ("Skip") K6DGW
> Sparks NV USA
> Washoe County DM09dn
>
>
>> On 3/30/2017 12:47 PM, Wayne
I cast my ballot for NO internal coupler.
1) An internal coupler is NOT needed by many who would rather not pay for
something they don’t need. Sure, it could be optional but see points 2 and 3.
2) An internal coupler at 1.5 KW as anything beyond a trivial “line flattener”
will be large. If
Yup. Earlier in the thread Mike / KK5F pointed that out. He was on the RX end
of the circuit.
We monitored stations from Perth, somewhere in the UK, east coast of USA, west
coast of USA, etc. etc. Must have been six or eight stations on the air. We
also monitored WWVB but I think that was
Yeah, I think they’re on 18.6 kHz — unless, of course, they managed to buy a
VFO in the last 40 years!
Doug, W7KF
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
>
> The Jim Creek antenna facility is amazing - a series of over mile long wires
> (cables) for the radiator
Way back in ancient times I worked at a research lab where we had a LOT of
receivers tuned to all the signals we could find below 60 kHz. I think the
lowest was 13.x. There was an 18.x and 24.x etc. etc. We were only interested
in signal strengths and plotted each signal on strip chart
Yup, I am using a WinKeyer USB with a K3S and ACOM 1500.
The WinKeyer is driven by N1MM+ and by paddles. I run the K3S in QSK mode.
The K3S controls the amp key line. Works great; no problems whatsoever.
Do you have specific questions?
73,
Doug, W7KF
http://www.w7kf.com
Yup, that was me.
There were some good suggestions made here and I’ve checked them all and I’m
unable to get the K3S to chirp. So, at present: unable to replicate..
Some of the suggested things I’ve checked:
1) SWR at the K3S while driving the ACOM 1500 (same operating conditions) is
1.05 to
I was in the CW SS in November using my then new K3S with an ACOM 1500. All of
which was *great*.
But, then, I received an Official Observer Advisory Notice that I was “emitting
a CW signal with a chirp”. The report detailed a QSO that is, indeed, in my SS
log. I was running on 20 meters
I agree — the K-Pod is really cool for contesting. I love that the K-Pod can
sit right next to the keyboard *and* that it has a goodly number of F-Keys.
I set mine up for CW SS as:
F1 - SUB RX On/Off
F1H - Diversity On/Off
F2 - APF On/Off
F3 - NB
How about a speaker cabinet with mounting holes such that a commonly
available power supply could be mounted inside? With a slot on the back
panel for the incoming and outgoing power leads? All it would take
would be a loose alliance with a power supply company like Samlex for
example.
A spreadsheet analysis may lead one to conclude that the project is
unworthy.
But, the spreadsheet does not have field types to include the value of
visual impact upon the whole. Or, a measure of completeness of the
product line. Or measure the negative impact of having to re-purpose a
In the old days there were some pretty creaky old timers out there.
But, the newer SOLAS requirements pretty much put an end to that.
Now, anyone working on a ship has to have gone through a couple of days
of survival swimming, a couple of days of ship-board fire fighting
training, etc. etc.
The USNS and the gray hulls in the Ready Reserve fleet all carry R/Os.
Those ships still have real radio shacks with HF gear in them although
they get used on Mil frequencies not on maritime freqs. Also, secure
satellite, etc. Need a Secret clearance to get the job these days.
I think all
Yes!!
I've been reading this list because I'm contemplating switching from an
Omni-VII to a K-Line. But, I love the way my station is set-up with the
rig up on a riser so I can look straight at it and the remote tuning
knob and keypad on the desk where I can reach it.
Pic at:
Listening to that recording was a *great* way to start the day!
Re-visiting the house you grew up in, you find that it's a lot smaller
today than it was 40 years ago. Likewise, I would have *sworn* that Vic
was a lot faster in those days than on the recording! Maybe I'm
remembering KH6IJ
I think he stated earlier that he was using a freshly calibrated 25H
element.
73,
-Doug, W7KF
http://www.w7kf.com
On 03/13/2012 12:24 PM, WILLIS COOKE wrote:
How do you know that the Bird measurement is actually 11.5 watts? The
accuracy claimed by Bird for a new element is +/- 5% of full
There are a 25H elements in existence -- just google bird 25H.
Here's a couple:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/370381238917
http://www.chuckmartin.com/search/25H
I think that bird does not stock them but will be happy to make them on
demand. Certainly, they have made a lot of them in the past.
So, as it turns out, we *really* do need the KPA-1500! ;-)
73,
Doug, W7KF
http://www.w7kf.com
Tony Estep wrote:
I guess this is good news for the 80/160 fans:
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml
It ain't pretty.
Tony KTØNY
Definitely a scam.
The big image embedded at the end of the description with the contact
me before bidding or I will cancel your bid is a dead giveaway. That
sort of demand is against ebay rules. The scammers put those words in
an image file so that automated processes don't see them. That
Ultimatic is a lifesaver!
When I moved from my W9TO keyer with a single paddle to a modern keyer with
dual paddles I could hardly send CW. What a shock that was!
Then, I discovered ultimatic mode and life was good again.. ;-)
73,
Doug, W7KF
http://www.w7kf.com
Barry wrote:
Bud,
You're
Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
but they were operators on some rare, private, closed circuit
[Apologies to all for this off-topic rambling]
I was the R/O on the SS Tampa Bay (KNJA), one of the last of the US Flag, all
CW, banana boats. Most of the US Flag ships had long since gone to SITOR or
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was that the one in the ARRL Handbook around 1958 - 1961?
The keyer described earlier sounded different than the one in the
handbook in that it had a monitor and didn't self complete..
I built the one in the handbook and used if for
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 02:51 +, Ken Kopp wrote:
And a couple of spare octal-based mercury
wetted relays for the Hallicrafters TO keyer.
Hey, I *still* have my W9TO keyer!! Love that thing although the old
keyers don't have dot or dash memory so I can hardly send on those
things anymore.
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 20:29 -0700, Terry Conboy wrote:
How about some simple countermeasures (for a future firmware release):
Blank, then transmit an equal length pulse (on a clear frequency, of
course), with optional automatic ID every N minutes.
That is the best argument I've heard for
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 03:20 +, Ken Kopp wrote:
And they wouldn't accept my 20 WPM Radiotelegraph ticket
for my 20 WPM extra! But by then it was a snap.
I had to get a new 2nd Telegraph a few years back and the FCC gave me
20 WPM credit -- not for having had a prior 2nd Telegraph but for
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 21:22 -0700, Phil Kane wrote:
They don't allow that any more. I could have had it - my Extra
exam was in 1974 - but I was too busy being an FCC field
supervisor to get a round tuit g
Yeah, I was surprised at the time. I was ready to take the test but the
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 21:58 -0700, Phil Kane wrote:
The only ones at the agency who welcomed the privatization of
exams (both ham and commercial) were a number of secretaries
The first time I took the 2nd Telegraph my steely eyed examiner was a
very nice woman (Seattle office). I showed up
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 06:08 +, Ken Kopp wrote:
Was R/O on several USCGS/NOAA ships and hung out
at WPD in Tampa. Lots of 400 - 500 kHz time. Tx was a
TBL with M/G set in the basement. (:-)
Anyone know where I could find an RCA 8506 ... or an 8510?
Or the Mackay equivalent/s? Google
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 13:36 -0400, Dan Barker wrote:
My very first Field Day was using the call AA4U for the CW tent. (Omni C,
upside down Bencher for the southpaw, etc.). Interesting. I wonder what else
in a call makes it MARS vs Southeast Amateur Extra?
Actually, I think the ARMY MARS
35 matches
Mail list logo