Zilmer mzil...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: Ken Alexander k.alexan...@rogers.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net, elecraft...@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: q3o5o6hj8cnup6j0v4gpqcqa1gorc9k...@4ax.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Maybe if someone
The new AOR AR-7070, which should go into production this year, will
probably arouse interest among serious SWLs.
From the results of tests made on prototype #2, I understand that this
receiver covers the frequency range 10 kHz - 30 MHz without any gaps, and
good sensitivity across this range.
Subject: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: 577034.59689...@web46013.mail.sp1.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I would like to see a true SDR receiver from Elecraft. Something like
the QSR1 with a pre-selector and the facility to use
: Matt Zilmer mzil...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: Ken Alexander k.alexan...@rogers.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net, elecraft...@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: q3o5o6hj8cnup6j0v4gpqcqa1gorc9k...@4ax.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Maybe
It would be a pretty expensive shortwave receiver:
K3/10 $1500
KBPF3 $140
-
$1640
You'd save some by eliminating the 10W PA but have to add some for the
8-pole 6 kHz or 13 Khz filter to replace the stock 5-pole 2.7 kHz
filter. Would people be willing to
I suspect there's a larger market there than you might think, at that
price. TenTec RX-340 runs a bit over US$ 4K. NRD 545 (discontinued) go
on the used market for $1.3K.
Both of those receivers are much larger physically than the K3, so there
may be some resistance in paying more per cubic
Ten-Tec's is $4250... Granted it goes down to 5kHz, but it only goes up
to 30MHz...
73, Ross N4RP
On 3/17/2011 4:14 PM, Alan Bloom wrote:
Would people be willing to spend well over $1500 for the best
SWL receiver on the market?
Al N1AL
--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an
I'm pretty sure that there are people out there who have indeed spent
that kind of money on SWL receivers, but it seems to me that it would be
far more prudent for one of them to just buy the bare minimum K3 as
is. If you (or you heirs) ever wanted to sell it, there is a much
larger market
I doubt there would be savings in removing the 10W PA, but it could be
disabled by either running in TX TEST all the time, or by putting a
jumper on the ACC TX INH line and setting the correct state in the menu.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 3/17/2011 4:14 PM, Alan Bloom wrote:
It would be a pretty
@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
I doubt there would be savings in removing the 10W PA, but it could be
disabled by either running in TX TEST all the time, or by putting a
jumper on the ACC TX INH line and setting
: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
I doubt there would be savings in removing the 10W PA, but it could be
disabled by either running in TX TEST all the time, or by putting a
jumper on the ACC TX INH line and setting the correct state in the menu.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 3/17/2011 4
I would like to see a true SDR receiver from Elecraft. Something like the QSR1
with a pre-selector and the facility to use it with a transmitter built in.
Very few of the SDR's on the market are designed more for swl'ing rather than
ham use. A Ham friendly SDR from Elecraft would get my
John,
The K3 is an SDR. It does not depend on an external computer to support
its operation, but by all proper definitions of an SDR, the K3 qualifies.
I am not certain what your true SDR means.
If your definition of an SDR is one that is a black box that requires
a computer to be a fully
] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: elecraft...@yahoogroups.com, elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 4:14 PM
It would be a pretty expensive
shortwave receiver:
K3/10 $1500
KBPF3 $140
-
$1640
You'd save some by eliminating the 10W PA
, Alan Bloom n...@sonic.net wrote:
From: Alan Bloom n...@sonic.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: elecraft...@yahoogroups.com, elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 4:14 PM
It would be a pretty expensive
shortwave receiver:
K3/10
sampling and DUC transmitters are in all our futures.
73
John
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
From: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [Elecraft_K3] KR3 SW Receiver.
To: juergen plebia...@yahoo.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday
Well...
If it won't get much cheaper than basic K3, what's the point then? I'd
rather have K3 with sub-receiver, all the filters I need (or, rather, want)
AND with all the features Elecraft wizards put into its firmware. An
alternative is to force them to write, test and support two different
17 matches
Mail list logo
