Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
cable, I agree they are probably being cautious. After all, I understand the
ARRL has launched their own program of technical courses to help Hams become
more technically competent.
The current UK licensing regime requires that a project be built before
one can get
Leaving out the finals might do the trick!
The upgrade to full transceiver would be about pretty cheap (two
transistors, some hardware and those pesky thermal pads).
Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456
snip
I would presume that there would be some market for a K2 with build
instructions modified to complete
Well, you need to get the antenna, coax, a key, microphone?
I would nix the KPA100, and the DSP, and even the SSB option as
you can receive ssb fine on the base K2.
It might be more fun to put up a G5RV and use the low power
auto tuner, you can go anyplace on any band that way.
If you really
You'll need the SSB module for the digital modes. Keep it on the list.
The KAT-2 (auto tuner) also adds a real bridge and a second antenna
connector. If you have an antenna that is matched on all freqs you
plan on running, and only plan on having one antenna, the KAT-2 won't
do anything for you.
First of all, there was substantial interest in the K2 sitting alongside the
K3 at SeaPac in Oregon June 2 and 3. It's a great rig and, as several
people pointed out, one is assembled at lower cost from individual parts.
Elecraft just did a major update of the K2 Owner's Manual to be sure
Brett, N2DTS wrote:
If you really want to TRANSMIT the digital modes, I guess you would need the
KPA100,...
-
Maybe for some modes. I haven't run all of them by any means.
I get out fine using PSK31 at 5 watts or less!
A few years ago it was uncommon to run into
This was a good usable rig for very little money,
not sure if they are still selling the entire kits
or just the boards, or what, but for $80.00, it
was a well working radio, and easy to build.
http://emtech.steadynet.com/nw.shtml
All the verticals I ever used had VERY narrow bandwidths
on
I wonder how a whole class of students, some
with potentially no electronics or mechanical
skills - could do, building a K2 HF Transceiver?
Who would ride herd over them, steer them,
and check their work as they soldered and placed
100's and 100's of electronic and mechanical
parts in place, in
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
First of all, there was substantial interest in the K2 sitting
alongside the
K3 at SeaPac in Oregon June 2 and 3. It's a great rig and, as several
people pointed out, one is assembled at lower cost from individual
parts.
They are
On Jun 12, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
As a member and supporter of the ARRL since 1952 I don't beat up
on them
too easily. Considering the fact that many if not most Hams today
would not
consider picking up a soldering iron to do more than attach a
connector to a
cable, I
So after all this discussion of the K3, here I am getting ready to
purchase a K2.
As I think I have mentioned before, I am setting up a science and
technology center in our school, Granite Bay Montessori School.
(http://www.gbmontessori.com) We have received a grant from the ARRL
to help
11 matches
Mail list logo