Jim,
It is important to realize that the K3 bandwith is equal to the audio
bandwidth. The K3 reports the audio bandwidth.
A K3 with a 6 kHz filter is limited to a maximum of 3 kHz audio because
an AM signal is double sideband and the IF bandwidth for the AM signal
must be twice the audio
OK, I think I read something into Joe's post that wasn't really there,
that's how I thought it worked and I I think Joe was referring to the
DSB BW at the 15 kHz 2nd IF. Enjoy the GC, we stayed in a cabin maybe
50 meters from the edge ... awesome!
73,
Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
Sparks NV DM09dn
Joe, I think the confusion might come in with the typo -> A 5 KHz *audio*
bandwidth would be equivalent to a 10 Hz RF (IF)
Should be -> A 5 KHz *audio* bandwidth would be equivalent to a 10 KHz RF (IF)
73,
Bill WE5P
>
> On Dec 13, 2019 at 15:31, Joe
> On Dec 13, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> A 5 KHz *audio* bandwidth would be equivalent to a 10 Hz RF (IF)
> bandwidth.
I expect you mean a 10 kHz RF bandwidth, not 10 Hz.
wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
Fred,
The audio CODECs in the K3 have a 12 kHz sample rate. This puts the maximum
audio bandwidth at 6 kHz. Practical limits of DSP filtering in the context of
the K3 implementation limit audio to 4.5 kHz or so.
Aliasing around the 12 kHz sample rate of the CODECs required that “brick wall”
On 2019-12-13 1:22 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> Could you explain a little more?
What's to explain? AM is a double sideband signal - equal width
either side of the carrier with each sideband carrying the same
audio information but inverted in frequency.
A 5 KHz *audio* bandwidth would be
Could you explain a little more?
73,
Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
Sparks NV DM09dn
Washoe County
On 12/13/2019 6:19 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Remember, the DSP display is audio. 5 KHz represents 10 Hz at
RF (IF).
__
Elecraft mailing list
On 2019-12-13 8:58 AM, Jim Stoneback via Elecraft wrote:
Is there any way to expand the (receive) DSP maximum bandwidth beyond 5kHz in AM mode?
No. It would be ineffective since the audio chain has a
4500 Hz "brickwall" (sharp cutoff) lowpass filter limiting
the audio response (to remove
Is there any way to expand the (receive) DSP maximum bandwidth beyond 5kHz in
AM mode? I have the 13 kHz roofing filter installed.
73,
Jim K4AXF
K3 #4936
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
for VK9XG...
73 David G3WGN M6O
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message
From: Grant Youngman
Date: 22/09/2018 15:07 (GMT+00:00)
To: David Aslin G3WGN
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP firmware update 'Missing'
Since you are looking
Since you are looking at the FTP site, just download all of the files from
there to a local folder. Then browse to that local folder with Utility instead
of having Utility do the download.
Grant NQ5T
K3 #2091 KX3 #8342
> On Sep 22, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Dave G3WGN M6O wrote:
>
> Update: on
Update: on further examination when I 'Copy new files from Elecraft' in the
utility, it responds with '2 files copied' then waits for the download.
Clearly it must need to copy more than two files for MCU, FPF and DSP. I can
see all the needed files on the Elecraft ftp site, but the utility is
Hi, hoping the Elecraft brains trust can help. I'm updating the firmware on
my K3 in preparation for the forthcoming 6Gs DXpedition to VK9X.
Current DSP firmware is 2.86; when I 'Copy new files from Elecraft' in the
utility, I get the latest MCU and FPF releases, but both DSP are shown as
Doug,
I also have the older DSP board. I elected to add the Low Pass Filter
add-on-board because I was not interested in the extended low frequency
response.
So the proper answer depends on your aspirations - the low pass filter
does provide a definite advantage in high frequency 'hiss'.
9月23日 (週五) 8:20 AM
主題︰ [Elecraft] K3 DSP Old and New
I have an older 2009 K3 without the updated DSP. What is your opinion? Is it
worth the upgrade to the newer D version? Anyone done a comparison?
Doug K6JEY
__
Elecraft m
I have an older 2009 K3 without the updated DSP. What is your opinion? Is it
worth the upgrade to the newer D version? Anyone done a comparison?
Doug K6JEY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:20 AM
To: 'jim'; 'Fred Townsend'; 'Robert Sands'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Jim,
Here's a non-KookAid question for you.
Just like in school..
Show your work.
You say that radio has better than the K3/K3S with la
@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Jer,
Perceived audio is just that. Perception. And to the individual, it is
*everything*.
Op skill does come into play, no doubt.
Types of noise come into play, no doubt.
The fact there are only two settings on the Kenwood does
d, and
Patriotic.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of jim
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:23 AM
To: ae...@carolinaheli.com; 'Fred Townsend'; 'Robert Sands';
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Jer,
ts
> AE4PB, K3S - S.N. 010324
> http://www.qrz.com/db/AE4PB
> An Amateur is - Considerate, Loyal, Progressive, Friendly, Balanced, and
> Patriotic.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of jim
> Sent: Tuesday, Nov
Wow, I didn't think anyone coded in assembly language any longer.
Live and learn!
73 de Jim - AD6CW
On 11/9/2015 6:46 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
The K3's DSP code is written in very efficient assembly language. It executes
quickly, because it doesn't need the lengthy library-routine calls
Topic has digressed to NR:
Simple question. Is all this feedback on how good or how bad NR
works about reception of CW (or does it apply to SSB?). Only time I
really need NR is when local noise overwhelms normally strong SSB
(e.g. signal is running S8-S9 and noise rises up to S8-S9. I find
C, Fists
> AE4PB, K3S - S.N. 010324
> http://www.qrz.com/db/AE4PB
> An Amateur is - Considerate, Loyal, Progressive, Friendly, Balanced, and
> Patriotic.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of jim
> Sent: Tuesda
Everybody stop, I hit the send button to soon.
I know what it stands for.
Jim
W6AIM
-Original Message-
From: jim [mailto:jbol...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:01 AM
To: 'Edward R Cole'; 'Elecraft@mailman.qth.net'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
What
What is SSB an acronym for???
Jim
W6AIM
.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Edward
R Cole
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Topic has digressed
It seems to me that “drowning in Kool Aid” is no worse than what are little
more than anecdotal comments about how one radio is better than another one in
regards to noise reduction. Especially because essentially the same “leaky
LMS” algorithm is used by most if not all of them. And it
Folks, we closed this thread earlier today.
73,
Eric
/elecraft.com/
On 11/10/2015 12:06 PM, GRANT YOUNGMAN wrote:
It seems to me that “drowning in Kool Aid” is no worse than what are little
more than anecdotal comments about how one radio is better than another one in
regards to noise
, 2015 10:44 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Topic has digressed to NR:
Simple question. Is all this feedback on how good
or how bad NR works about reception of CW (or does
it apply to SSB?). Only time I really need NR is
when local noise overwhelms
What on earth would cause you to make a statement like that? A large
number of rigs still on the market have fundamental and inexcusably bad
key clicks and phase noise that pollute the bands, not to mention the
ones with wide front ends that pound the bejeezus out of the AGC from 10
KHz
On Tue,11/10/2015 2:35 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
There are no bad radios currently on the market.
Obviously you've never operated a contest with a neighbor running an
FTDX5000, IC7600, IC706, or others in that class. All occupy a lot more
than their fair share of CW bandwidth and TX lots
There are no bad radios currently on the market. Some are better
radios, but better is in the eyes {ears} of the beholder. However,
those radios of yesteryear, as compared to the current breed of radios
from Elecraft, Kenwood, Yaesu, ICOM, Flex and Tentec and ? are
really in the back
Guys - This thread is closed.
Eric
Moderator - really!
/elecraft.com/
On 11/10/2015 3:00 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
What on earth would cause you to make a statement like that? A large number
of rigs still on the market have fundamental and inexcusably bad key clicks
and phase noise that
Watch it Wayne, you almost made me do the proverbial spew on the keyboard with
that one HI HI!!
OTOH, a ham friend of mine a long time ago briefly lived in a trailer park
while he was going through some marital difficulties. He had his Swan 350 set
up there. A next trailer neighbor of his
, Loyal, Progressive, Friendly, Balanced, and
Patriotic.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of jim
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 9:14 PM
To: 'Fred Townsend'; 'Robert Sands'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor
I was informed by an ICOM 7851 owner that the ICOM has DSP processors are
10 times as fast as the K3 and therefore has noise reducing advantage. Not
that important to me but curious if this is meaningful and if there is
consideration of chasing this performance spec by Elecraft and if not Why
not?
The IC-7851 consumes *200 Watts in RECEIVE mode!*
The K3.About 12 watts.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
> The K3's DSP code is written in very efficient assembly language. It
> executes quickly, because it doesn't need the lengthy library-routine
craft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Fred
Townsend
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 4:46 PM
To: 'Robert Sands'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Bob:
There are many many reasons why this is an apples to watermelon comparison.
Too many for discussion here. However tw
The K3's DSP code is written in very efficient assembly language. It executes
quickly, because it doesn't need the lengthy library-routine calls typical of
the C or C++ code written for GHz-clock DSPs. The code is also extremely
compact.
The crystal oscillator frequency is not a direct
Steve Ellington wrote:
> The IC-7851 consumes *200 Watts in RECEIVE mode!*
So it can dampen shaking due to earthquakes and nearby teen house parties.
> The K3.About 12 watts.
So you can run it from a solar panel after the aforementioned disasters.
Wayne
N6KR
While I appreciate the input from Wayne on the K3's programming
architecture (as well as the facts on the power consumption
characteristics), the reality is that many of us have identified other rigs
that have implemented NR in a way that produces results that are much more
satisfactory. Comments
"Steve Ellington" <steven...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Steve Ellington wrote:
> The IC-7851 consumes *200 Watts in RECEIVE mode!*
So it can dampen shaking due to earthquakes and
e low cost Kenwood TS-480
.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 4:34 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Some how I just am not all that impresse
Wayne,
Thanks for the unedited answer with no bias.
Jim
W6AIM
.
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Wayne
Burdick
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 6:46 PM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
The K3
; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Bob:
There are many many reasons why this is an apples to watermelon comparison.
Too many for discussion here. However two thoughts. In general the faster
the processor the 'more' chances of producing RFI. It could be Wayne and the
ecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
Maybe because Elecraft does not want to produce a rig that sells for
$14,500?
Tom - W4BQF
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On
Some how I just am not all that impressed by those "fantastic" DSP
numbers. What does impress me is the absolute quality of the received
signals presented to my ears by the K3.
In about 55 years, my K3 is the most satisfying receiver I have ever
used - and I have had most of them along the
9, 2015 1:32 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 DSP processor speed
I was informed by an ICOM 7851 owner that the ICOM has DSP processors are
10 times as fast as the K3 and therefore has noise reducing advantage. Not
that important to me but curious if this is meaningful
It reminds me of my computer overclocking days when bragging rights went
to the guy who could run the processor at the highest clock without
roasting throwing BSOD's or cooking the silicon. It's analogous to
today's PC gamers who overclock video cards to get the very last frame
per second on
Maybe because Elecraft does not want to produce a rig that sells for
$14,500?
Tom - W4BQF
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Robert
Sands
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 4:32 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 DSP
According to the review in the November RSGB magazine (RadCom) it hosts
three 32 bit floating point DSP units. Two clocked at 393MHz for the
receivers and the transmitter an one clocked at 370MHz for the spectrum
scope. Also two 24-bit DAC's.
I never use NR so essentially I don't really care
Regarding the recent thread about the K3 DSP board, according to
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/mods/dsp_rev_c_information.htm
it says that beginning serial number 3626 +/- 10, K3s shipped rev D of the
DSP board.
Hope the info is useful to some. 73,
Mike ab3ap
I posted a few time on this mailing list about problems with the K3 DSP. I
also mentioned a DSP Project and engineer and me worked on several years ago
called The Hamblaster. I also mentioned that I wrote a Windows based
program that allowed me to control the Hamblaster. I decided to
I don't think it's possible. Some dsp functions are not available with AGC off.
Sometimes it's quieter with AGC off and reduced rf gain but not always.
After 3 years, the best way to reduce hiss for me is to reduce hi cut (on ssb)
sometimes to 2.4,sometimes 2.1.
I would think in a contest you
Can you say masking tape? I knew you could.
On 3/3/2014 9:54 PM, WILLIS COOKE wrote:
I don't think the LCD will work well after a good coating of Rustoleum!
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
. Taylor,
WB6UUT
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:47 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP bypass
Can you say masking tape? I knew you could.
On 3/3/2014 9:54 PM, WILLIS COOKE wrote:
I don't think the LCD will work well after a good coating of Rustoleum
Can the DSP in the K3 be bypassed? In other words, can it be operated as a
conventional superheterodyne receiver without any processing? Would be
interesting to do A/B comparison testing. Years ago I had a Ten Tec Omni 6
Plus, a great radio except for the horrid DSP hiss. I always wished I
Last really quiet production rig I used was a TenTec Corsair - fully
analog. I should have never sold it - best 160 rig I ever had. Dead
quiet winter bands and signals would just jump out at you - sort of like
a signal breaking squelch on FM.
Bill W2BLC K-Line
Not without a big hardware modification. The detection (do we still call
it that?) -- conversion to audio is done in the DSP. And a lot of other
stuff.
On 3/3/2014 5:32 PM, GDR wrote:
Can the DSP in the K3 be bypassed? In other words, can it be operated
as a conventional superheterodyne
Here is the latest 100% Analog Radio on the market today.
http://www.hilberling-usa.com/
Even Rob Sherwood raves about it!
BTW, don't worry about the price. It's only Money :-)
73 Milverton.
On Monday, March 3, 2014 8:17 PM, Vic Rosenthal K2VCO k2vco@gmail.com
wrote:
Not
Good question Vic, do we still call it detection or is it more appropriately
conversion? I thought at one time during all my button pushing on the last year
fiddling with the K3 settings, I was sure I remember the LCD display reading
DSP OFF but I could never get it to happen again. At the time
How is a radio with direct digital synthesis and DSP processing 100% analog?
73,
Scott, N9AA
On 3/3/14 9:28 PM, tnny...@yahoo.com wrote:
Here is the latest 100% Analog Radio on the market today.
http://www.hilberling-usa.com/
Even Rob Sherwood raves about it!
BTW, don't worry about the
That's one of those items where if you have to ask the price,. you
can't afford it.
73 de Ray
K2ULR
On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:28 PM, tnny...@yahoo.com wrote:
Here is the latest 100% Analog Radio on the market today.
http://www.hilberling-usa.com/
Even Rob Sherwood raves about it!
BTW,
$18,000+! And for more than 4 times the price of a loaded K3, you get
4dB better close-spaced dynamic range. That is only $3K per dB. On the
plus side, they do come in 4 colors, vs. the K3's one. I'm sure people
will be lining up to buy them.
73,
Scott, N9AA
On 3/3/14 10:42 PM, Ray Sills
Maybe Elecraft will offer different color faceplates for the K3?
Anyone like Pink?...or Purple?...or ?
TIC folks..
Gary
On 4 March 2014 13:50, Scott Manthe scott.man...@gmail.com wrote:
$18,000+! And for more than 4 times the price of a loaded K3, you get 4dB
better close-spaced
On 03/03/2014 08:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Maybe Elecraft will offer different color faceplates for the K3?
Hey, we're not appliance operators! What ever happened to homebrewing?
Your local Ace Hardware has Rustoleum in dozens of designer colors.
:=)
Alan N1AL
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 DSP bypass
On 03/03/2014 08:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Maybe Elecraft will offer different color faceplates for the K3?
Hey, we're not appliance operators! What ever happened to homebrewing? Your
local Ace Hardware has Rustoleum in dozens of designer colors
The LCD will work just fine, but the customer may not be able to see the
icons and values.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 3/4/2014 12:54 AM, WILLIS COOKE wrote:
I don't think the LCD will work well after a good coating of Rustoleum!
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ Trustee N5BPS, USS
The K3 is an SDR transceiver. That means that the filtering,
modulation, and demodulation (as well as noise reduction and many other
functions) is done in the digital domain. One cannot disable the DSP
processing of the K3 without disabling the entire transceiver for both
transmit and
Is it possible to determine the rev code of the DSP board without removing it?
73, Mike NF4L
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
You only have to remove the front panel *assembly* to be able to see the
label.. It cannot be seen with the K3 fully assembled.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 7/5/2013 8:34 AM, Mike Reublin wrote:
Is it possible to determine the rev code of the DSP board without removing it?
73, Mike NF4L
I know we all have our own unique noise environment but I am curious what
settings others
use for reducing the background noise on SSB.
Not for really digging into a noise issue but for just reducing the background
noise for comfortable listening.
I have been playing around with the different
@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2012年11月8日 (週四) 9:33 AM
主題︰ [Elecraft] K3 DSP NR for SSB, settings you like ?
I know we all have our own unique noise environment but I am curious what
settings others
use for reducing the background noise on SSB.
Not for really digging into a noise issue but for just reducing
Is it possible to implement Noise Reduction in the DSP for Data
A mode? Or is it a really stupid idea?
The PSK software I use -- cocoaModem for the Mac -- has a noise
reduction mode which works reasonably well when it is receiving
a broad spectrum signal -- 2 KHz or more. It does not work well
Have you tried using a narrower filter in the K3 or using the K3 NR?
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
ARRL Lifetime Member
QCWA Lifetime Member
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:03:20 -0700, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
Is it possible to implement Noise Reduction in the DSP for Data
A mode? Or is
Note that NR is not available in DATA A mode -- K3 manual p25:
NR turns noise reduction on. It doesn’t apply to DATA or FM
modes, or with AGC turned off.
Ray identified why I would like the K3 NR to work in DATA A when
he said, NR algorithms -need- a broad chunk of spectrum. If
the DSP NR
Bill,
I have not found 24 bit soundcards to be a requirement for data modes.
16 bit soundcards will do just fine.
Yes, NR is not available in Data modes because it distorts the signal
and would result in reduced copyability. The object is to produce as
clean a signal as possible to the
MFJ makes something called the MFJ 1026 noise remover, that allegedly can
remove or reduce QRM from a specific source by phase shifting and mixing
the signals from your main antenna and an extra receive antenna. Details
here: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1205
I wonder if the K3 with the
Regarding the MFJ-1026, it works quite well if your noise is coming basically
from one direction.
Bob
K6UJ
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Thomas Horsten wrote:
MFJ makes something called the MFJ 1026 noise remover, that allegedly can
remove or reduce QRM from a specific source by phase
It works quite well if you can put up a second antenna that receives the
noise you are trying to eliminate. Directionality really has nothing to do
with it. If you can receive the noise at an adequate enough level, the
MFJ-1026 can be used to null it out by changing the phase of the undesired
Hi Gents,
I have an early K3 - serial # around 400. Do I need to swap the entire
DSP board out for a Rev D board or is the little mod kit *K3DSPLPF
*that is sold for $40 going to do it for me?
--
Cheers,
Nick NT1A
__
Elecraft
Nick,
The little K3DSPLPF will take care of the high frequency part of the
spectrum just the same as the DSP Board swap, BUT, it will not extend
the low frequency response.
So, the answer depends on what you want to accomplish - if you want both
the high and low frequency changes in your K3,
@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2011年12月5日 (週一) 10:20 PM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] K3 dsp board upgrade for early radio
Nick,
The little K3DSPLPF will take care of the high frequency part of the
spectrum just the same as the DSP Board swap, BUT, it will not extend
the low frequency response.
So, the answer depends
Thank you so much Don. Your answer clarified everything about this
upgrade for me. I will swap out the entire board.
Cheers,
Nick NT1A
On 12/5/2011 9:20 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Nick,
The little K3DSPLPF will take care of the high frequency part of the
spectrum just the same as the DSP
I just sent this message to Elecraft support, but wondered if anyone out
there knows the answer or has experience:
I received my DSP upgrade board (K3DSPUPGD) around 10/14/2011 and am just
now installing it.
My K3 is serial number 1206.
Upon removing the original DSP board, I noted the board
從︰ Phil Westover 492comm...@comcast.net
收件人︰ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2011年10月23日 (週日) 9:16 AM
主題︰ [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade Board Question
I just sent this message to Elecraft support, but wondered if anyone out
there knows the answer or has experience:
I
The easiest way to tell is that the new board has a little daughter-board with
low-pass
filter components on it. If both boards have them, you are already updated. If
neither,
then they sent you an old board. If one does and the other doesn't, install the
one that does!
On 10/22/2011 6:16
Holger,
The DSP Upgrade is certainly possible for your K3 - whether that is a
board exchange or the LPF which you add to the board.
The question about price and shipping should be directed to
sa...@elecraft.com for a complete answer.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 10/7/2011 1:00 AM, dl9hda wrote:
Hello,
K3 DSP upgrade
Holger,
The DSP Upgrade is certainly possible for your K3 - whether that is a
board exchange or the LPF which you add to the board.
The question about price and shipping should be directed to
sa...@elecraft.com for a complete answer.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 10/7/2011 1:00 AM, dl9hda
. The DSP modification is definitely a must. NR before modification
has lot of artifacts.
TNX 73,
Johnny VR2XMC
從︰ Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
收件人︰ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2011年10月7日 (週五) 11:11 PM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft K3 DSP upgrade
Holger,
If you do the DSP board exchange, you do not have to be concerned about
the level of your current board - you will receive the latest level DSP
board in the exchange..
I believe the LPF can be added to any DSP board level.
For other upgrades, consult the list at the Elecraft website to
...@pt100.net
收件人︰ Johnny Siu vr2...@yahoo.com.hk
副本(CC)︰ elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2011年10月8日 (週六) 12:49 AM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft K3 DSP upgrade
Hi, but which Revision do I have?
Revision C startet in may 2009. It is ref b or a And is the upgrade
possible
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期︰ 2011年10月8日 (週六) 12:49 AM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft K3 DSP upgrade
Hi, but which Revision do I have?
Revision C startet in may 2009. It is ref b or a And is the upgrade
possible? I'm little bit confused!
Best 73s
Holger, DL9HDA
Von meinem
Holger,
I would recommend all the upgrades. I cannot think of any that are mode
specific.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 10/7/2011 10:26 PM, DL9HDA wrote:
Dear Johnny,
which modifications do you recommend? I do operations only in CW.
__
: [Elecraft] Elecraft K3 DSP upgrade
Holger,
I would recommend all the upgrades. I cannot think of any that are mode
specific.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 10/7/2011 10:26 PM, DL9HDA wrote:
Dear Johnny,
which modifications do you recommend? I do operations only in CW
Hello,
is the upgrade possible for an Elecraft K3 from may 2008? S/N is 827.
What will be the price including shipping to germany?
best 73s
Holger - DL9HDA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:
...The K3 is soundcard digital ready
I'm so dumb that when I got my K3, I spent half a day fiddling with cables,
jumpers etc. to configure my digital interface box. Then suddenly the light
dawned! It was a happy
Is it worth it? I have seen some people say yes and others that say no.
What is involved with the swap out. (read too lazy to read manual)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
寄件人﹕ Mike Fatchett W0MU w...@w0mu.com
收件人﹕ elecraft@mailman.qth.net
傳送日期﹕ 2011/3/23 (三) 9:53:50 AM
主題: [Elecraft] K3 DSP Upgrade
Is it worth it? I have seen some people say yes and others that say no.
What is involved with the swap out. (read too lazy to read manual
Hi Mike,
If you have an appreciation for the elimination of high end artifacts and
overall smother sound, the answer is clearly, 'Yes, it is worth it.' Prior
to the upgrade, I kept the top edge of the filter about 2.35 kHz as that was
about all I could take. Now I have no problem running the
I use my system with Line with Speaker Out - should read, 'I use my system
with Speaker out through a matching network to line in on my computer sound
card.' The matching network is a $20 item from an auto sound store and is
used to cut speaker level down to line level.
73,
Dick - KA5KKT
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo