Thanks to all for the good-spirited sharing of your "mic for K3" tips.
Very, very helpful.
And I see that it prompted a few other queries on the topic.
73! KE1CY
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
> Fun is whatever is fun for you. If a nice looking new
I've taken a number of old, cheap microphone housings (hamfest
acquisitions), and inserted an inexpensive electret cartridge. Every one of
them worked great! Truth is, I think you can probably buy most any electret
cartridge and get it to do just fine. Some may be a bit more responsive
than
> That system applies a positive voltage in the
> range of 18 - 48VDC through close-tolerance, equal value resistors to
> the two sides of the balanced signal circuit (pins 2 and 3 of the
> XL-connector) with return for DC going to the cable shield (Pin 1).
While modern professional condenser
Bruce,
i use a Shure 450 Series II and it works fine and you dont need the TXEQ or
BIAS.
Roger DL2YDP
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Appropriate-Mic-for-K3-new-tp7624456p7624472.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sun,12/4/2016 8:36 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Ham microphones are the Electret type, pro-audio Condenser microphones
are different.
Yes, they are POWERED differently, but the vast majority (I'd guess 90%)
of pro mics that are called condenser mics are electrets. BUT -- that
powering system
I hesitate to refer to the common electret microphones as "condenser" mics.
While many refer to the electret element microphones as "condenser"
microphones, be aware that in the pro-audio world, "condenser"
microphones are different - they usually require 48 volt Phantom
Voltage. They may be
Hi Bruce,
As others have noted, almost any mic that isn't "broke" can be made to
sound very good with the TXEQ in your K3. Something like 8 years ago, a
member of our contest club who is, like me, an audio professional, the
Yamaha CM500 boom mic headset and introduced our club to it. I've
*Piggybacking on Ron, since I couldn't find the original email.
I use a Heil Goldline with H4 and H5 elements, and I have an MH3. I've
used both and no one can tell the difference because of the TX EQ. I
suspect Don's earlier reply is spot-on as well. You can tailor any
modern
Fun is whatever is fun for you. If a nice looking new microphone is it, go
for it!
Half a century ago when microphones were still hand-made the more expensive
ones were significantly better than the cheap variety. Considerably more
labor went into assembling each element, and more elements
I have a Heil HM-12. Inexpensive and good sound.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Bruce Chadbourne
> wrote:
>
> Greetings - I've had my K3 for 5 years, mostly a CW and digital operator.
> I've never done much with my microphone -
I have 2 mics one on an old articulated lamp arm dynamic I
bought at a surplus store. It was a cheep knock of of a shure SM58
cost me $4.00 get tons of good audio remarks. just makes me wonder
why others need $300 condensers.
Second and a popular one on K3 is the Yamaha CM500
Bruce,
You'll get a ton of responses and most will be, "don't spend a lot"; most mics
work fine with the K3's EQ. I do agree with Nate. I use a Kenwood 60A (keep
preamp off) and do quite well. There are potential issues with RF, but the fix
is pretty easy. Because there has been a bad
Bruce,
If you want to go really cheap, get a "computer" microphone, plug it
into the back of the K3, turn on bias, turn the TX EQ two lowest bands
down as far as they will go and the third band down 6dB.
If you want some high frequency shaping, increase the highest 3 bands a bit.
73,
Don
For a desk mic I use a Kenwood MC-60A. It has some known issues and I
did some work on it to quell some RFI though the best improvement was
getting a good ground into the shack. It seems to work well.
73, Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The
14 matches
Mail list logo