The tuner loss also depends on how it is adjusted. For example the very popular
high-pass Tee with three adjustable elements has an infinite number of possible
combinations that will effect a match on the same load Z. One of them is the
lowest loss solution, all of the others aren't.
As I
I guess a little discussion of semantics is in order. Yes, EZNEC shows for
example, that a 12 AWG wire, 102' long and say 50' above avg ground shows an
impedance of ~98 +j0 at 14.32 MHz, so it is resonant in the 20-meter band,
because the reactance is zero, and it could be called a "resonant
I know handbook descriptions have declared this for years. They're simply
wrong. The folded part is a transmission line, it doesn't radiate and it has an
impedance different from the antenna. Why not just add a hundred feet or so of
transmission line to a 10' dipole and call it a 160
42 feet is 5/8 wavelength on 20 meters. That is the longest vertical one can
use before the radiation angle starts to rise above the horizon. Since
operation on the lower bands (esp. 80 meters) wants the longest possible
radiator, 42 feet is an excellent compromise for 80-20 operation (with
proper
I would suggest that the WSPR audio is not reliably triggering the
SignaLink PTT.
The SignaLink uses the incoming audio to trigger the PTT. In other
words, it is a VOX function inside the SignaLink box.
You will have better success using the K3 VOX than trying to use the
SignaLink vox (to
Bill,
That is correct, but the currents on the 33 feet feedline should be
balanced and of opposite polarity - so they cancel. The current at the
radiator center will be less than that of a full size 80 meter radiator,
so it will be less efficient than a full size 80 meter dipole with the
I use VOX for all digital modes. I started with a SignaLink,
moved to a Tascam unit, and now I am using the KIO3B upgrade to
the K3 to give it a USB port.
VOX will work fine with any digital mode that does not vary the
sound volume as a modulation technique. (I think all the common
ones use
Hi All,
I have a signalink with USB to the k3.
And I'd like to see if I can get it working with WSPR.
Currently, I'm receiving data from the K3, via the Signalink into the
software nicely.
But not able to get WSPR to trigger the K3 PTT.
Is anyone using the Signalink USB with WSPR, and perhaps
Fred,
Dirt was young when I was first licensed too.
I do remember those days of link coils that you slowly advanced into the
PA inductor and re-dipped the plate until the current draw was correct
for the power level that you wanted to operate. Those were the days of
plug-in coils for each
Jim and all:
Interesting comments on the G5RV (I've never built one but have a
local friend that uses one).
For years I used wire dipoles on HF bands: I made a 80/40m trap
dipole, 80/40m dipole with removable clip at 40m length which we call
the "Iditarod Special" as it was simple to use at
The CS40 is the smaller padded soft-case for the KX2 that is just a bit larger
than the radio.
http://store.lowepro.com/viewpoint-cs-40
The CS60 soft-case is about twice the internal volume as the CS40.
http://store.lowepro.com/viewpoint-cs-60
73,
Eric
/elecraft.com/
On 8/4/2016 5:06 PM,
My EFHW [granted, it is technically only one half-wave on 80 m] got a
pretty good write up in QST not long ago, after I had it installed, and
he elevated the far end into a tree. While his review was pretty
qualitative [:-(] which has become more common in QST these days, he
still got the
Let's see, 102 + 33 = 135. Isn't that pretty close to the length of an 80
Meter Dipole? The G5RV looks like two back-to-back inverted "L" antennas. The
twin lead is not feed line but part of the radiator.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Wes Stewart
On Thu,8/4/2016 4:31 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
There is one efficient way to broaden an antenna’s frequency range—lower the Q.
That is usually done with large-diameter elements. You can cover all of the 80
meter band with reasonable SWR using a “cage dipole”. That is what they do at
W1AW.
What happens if the antenna is well above ground, away from any fences?
On 8/4/2016 3:55 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
If we are just dodging the HOA, vs creating a remote site, or not operating
at all, what you describe seems quite reasonable. One half wave on 80, two
on 40, three on 30m, four
Wes and all,
Yes, the G5RV, the Off-Center-Fed antennas (Carolina Windom for one
example) and the 43 foot vertical have become "magical" antennas, and I
am not certain why.
My best guess is that they are "salvation" for hams who want to operate
on multiple bands with one antenna, and they
John,
I think this is a reasonable conclusion. Early on I used a G5RV and it was
invaluable reference for my later antenna building experience. I went to build
doublets in the same space and I still keep an 80m doublet in the air.
Recently I have gotten into building no compromise rotatable
There is one efficient way to broaden an antenna’s frequency range—lower the Q.
That is usually done with large-diameter elements. You can cover all of the 80
meter band with reasonable SWR using a “cage dipole”. That is what they do at
W1AW. At VHF/UHF, you may see bowtie antennas, which are
Good learning here all, thanks.
And Jim, very nice review of 43ft Verticals - thanks!
Bret/KC1CJN
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-with-Internal-ATU-KAT3A-and-Remote-ATU-tp7621137p7621193.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Fred,
Loss *anywhere* would broaden the antenna. Famously the B folded dipole,
fed at the center of one wire, and terminated with an RF resistor at the
center of the other, has for decades been serving commercial installations
with widely separated operating frequencies not connected by any
When Varney created his G5RV in 1946 a great many Hams still operated on but
one Ham band and parallel (open wire) transmission lines were still common.
The 102-foot G5RV is a 1-1/2 wave center fed doublet at 14.15 MHz. According
to one of my favorite wire antenna writers, (John Heys, G3BDQ
Ummm ... my HP48GX says 102' is very very close to 3 half-waves at 14
MHz which sounds sort of resonant-ish. Maybe a little known bug in my
calculator?
On a similar path, I decided to try out the 80-10 EFHW from MyAntennas
as an HOA Stealth antenna strung along the top of a 6' fence. It's
Wes..
Over the years, immediately after a change in QTH, I have used the G5RV
as an interim antenna. My personal experience is that it is a reasonable
performer, as compared to a single band, resonant half-wave dipole, at
the same height, fed by the same coax/length.
While I certainly
Will do - thank you.
Tom, W1TEF
On 8/4/2016 5:27 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
Hi Tom - Before shipping the paddle, please make sure first to contact
our support team via supp...@elecraft.com or on the phone to get a
return Service Authorization (RSA) tracking number, return
Hi Tom - Before shipping the paddle, please make sure first to contact our
support team via supp...@elecraft.com or on the phone to get a return Service
Authorization (RSA) tracking number, return instructions and our correct return
shipping address information.
That will speed its repair and
On 8/4/2016 4:41 PM, Wes Stewart wrote:
> First, a 102' length is not resonant on 20-meters, so in common
> jargon, it's *not* a 20-meter antenna, any more than any other random
> length would be.
*Not* true ... 102' is three half-waves on 20 meters:
984/2 * (3 -.05) / 14.15 = 102.6'
Check
Wayne,
I am constantly amazed at the quality Customer Service Elecraft provides
it's customer base. How many people can say they got a reply from one
of the guys who owns the company?
Thank you very much - the paddles will be on their way tomorrow.
Thanks for the information - I appreciate it.
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Your KXPD2 should not have any issue with contact screws loosening over time.
> Please return them for rework. Sorry about that.
Mine arrived yesterday and I had to have Chris at Elecraft explain to me
> It's a pity that too many newcomers, as well as many oldsters, are
> enamored by this piece of wire.
The G4RV is definitely a compromise antenna. However its advantage is
that is has low-enough SWR to be easily matched by most tuners on a
number of bands.
> ... the horrific losses that
In my 1999 paper, /"Balanced Transmission Line in Current Amateur Practice"/
(http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf), published in the /ARRL Antenna
Compendium, Volume 6, /pp 174-178, I have this statement: "A popular multiband
wire antenna is the so-called G5RV. This antenna is rarely used as
Hi Tom,
Your KXPD2 should not have any issue with contact screws loosening over time.
Please return them for rework. Sorry about that.
We needed a new paddle was for the KX2 because it's a much smaller radio. Some
operators using a KXPD3 with the KX2 find that they have to hold the radio in
I have both, am primarily a CW operator and this is my impression.
The KXPD2 has "issues" - at least for me. The contact posts keep
loosening up -
it doesn't matter how hard I tighten them (I'm afraid of over torquing
the screws
but they are snug), they loosen up. I tried non-hardening
Anyone have a KXPD3 for sale? $135 just seems too much.
Kurt, W7QHD
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Sid Frissell wrote:
>
> Well, I guess I've wrung all the opinions out of you re. KXPD 2 vs KXPD3.
> Seems like the KXPD2 is preferred.
> Thanks to all who commented
As usual, Jim is correct ...
I have Lou Varney's original article. The G5RV was designed as a 20M
--ONLY-- antenna. It's now achieved some kind of cult ... read voodoo ...
status. (;-)
If one has an antenna that is partially fed with balanced line that's then
directly (!) spliced to a specific
Received the UPS shipping label today, 4 Aug. Package shipped.
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Power-has-disappeared-tp7620735p7621178.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu,8/4/2016 9:16 AM, Ignacy wrote:
With 43 ft vertical a tuner at the base is critical to performance
It is FAR more complicated than that. Antenna tuners provide a match
between a transmitter and a feedline, or between an antenna and a
feedline. Like antennas like the G5RV, a 43 ft
Well, I guess I've wrung all the opinions out of you re. KXPD 2 vs KXPD3.
Seems like the KXPD2 is preferred.
Thanks to all who commented on and off list.
Sid, NZ7M
Sent From Sid Frissell's iPad
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
I have both. Neither has ever been installed. Contact me direct please.
Terry, W0FM
My call at arrl dot net
-Original Message-
From: EricJ [mailto:eric.c...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 2:03 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 73CNC Knobs
It's covered in the KXPA100 owner's manual, page 18.
73, Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David
F. Reed
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 10:14 PM
To: k...@yahoogroups.com; elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] KX3->
With G5RV you can extend the flat line to the shack and use KAT3 directly via
1:1 or 4:1 balun. Probably as good as the current choice.
With 43 ft vertical a tuner at the base is critical to performance and KAT3
may in some cases be detrimental.
Check the signal reports with both antennas. At my
KX3 to KXPA100 connections are covered well in the KXPA100 manual.
Download from Elecraft if you do not yet have that manual.
Connecting the KPA500 to the KXPA100 requires a cable from the KXPA100
PA KEY to the KPA500 PA KEY connector. Of course, you would also
connect the coax, but that
Yes. Check the manual(s) on KXPA100 and ATU.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 1:13 AM, David F. Reed wrote:
>
> Looking for a little QRO in my alternate station...
>
> I would like to be able to run my KX3 into my KXPA100 amplifier, and that
>
42 matches
Mail list logo