[Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Pete Smith
I was one of the early users of the CQ-Contest reflector, back in the 90s, and it was a long time before I became aware that hams were the only ones who referred to these things as reflectors rather than m,ailing lists or listservs. It also used to be that anyone posting on one of these

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Monty Shultes
Pete, I'll see your curmudgeon-ness and raise you a couple of gadflies. That appears to be a fad; folks who have no desire to be identified or help, just to stir pots, make waves, and think it's funny. The list manager here is working the issue, I know from his posts. 73, Monty K2DLJ Or

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Barry
Pete - Even though you're older than me, I can one-up you by saying I used the Internet (Usenet) in the mid-70s while in college and well as from home in the 80s with a UUCP emulator on my Commodore 64 :.) Yes, I do prefer postings with name/callsign. I believe it should be a list requirement,

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Don Wilhelm
Pete, I think the answer is simple - just do not respond to posts where the sender does not want to identify himself. I *might* try one response if it looks like a sincere request for help from someone, but I will ask that they identity (firstname and callsign) on any subsequent posts. I

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread JAMES ROGERS
Not at all, It is just plain courtesy to end your post with name and call sign on our amateur reflectors. It is beyond me as to why one would do otherwise. 73s Jim, W4ATK http://web.me.com/jimrogers_w4atk On Dec 8, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Pete Smith wrote: I was one of the early users of the

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread N1JM
If your name and call sign are part of your email address, why? -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Reflectors-73-and-so-on-tp5815207p5815360.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Chuck Guenther
Pete, I don't think this is curmudgeonly at all. I try to sign off with 73 on internet forum postings (such as on eHam), as well on e-mail lists like this one. I figure if I can't say 73, meaning, of course best regards, then perhaps I shouldn't send it.Keeps me in check! 73, Chuck

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Mike
1). It's a rule on this reflector. Those who don't know that, haven't read the periodic posting of the rules. 2) Your email address doesn't show up in the body of the message. Well maybe if you have a sig line. 3) It's a courtesy us old fogeys really really like. 73, Mike NF4L On 12/8/2010

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
As per the list guidelines, its perfectly OK to have your name and call (if you have a call) show up just in the email from: address. This shows on all emails resent by the list server. Let's end discussion on this topic as per my last posting ending the thread. 73, Eric WA6HHQ Elecraft

Re: [Elecraft] Reflectors, 73 and so on

2010-12-08 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
:-) (or should I say, Hi-Hi?). I use 73 in e-mails too, but I use it like I use it on the air - as part of a final salutation. When I expect to see more on the subject directed to me, I don't us it just as I don't use it to end every transmission on the air. As the saying goes, Civility Is The