To: Fred Jensen
Cc: <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] how to optimize end-fed?
2016-09-30 21:59 GMT+02:00 Fred Jensen <k6...@foothill.net>:
> This is reminiscent of one of the five volumes in Douglas Adams'
> trilogy, "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy."
I
I think what the original question is missing is the fact that we are
talking about the whole system, not just the inductor or the ATU.
The system is the final amplifier, the ATU, the feedline, the UNUN and
the antenna.
If minimizing the loss in the ATU increases the loss elsewhere, then we
Capacitors should usually have less loss than inductors. This is not true for
manual turners with polyvaricons. Those are fairly lossy capacitors.
wunder
K6WRU
Walter Underwood
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Oct 1, 2016, at 10:43 AM, Kevin - K4VD wrote:
>
Hi Holger:
I just finished reading an article that may answer your question:
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/9501046.pdf
If I'm understanding it correctly, the inductor's Q factor is the issue.
The Cout capacitance should be set to the highest value possible with the L
and
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] how to optimize end-fed?
In my opinion, what you want is the lowest SWR on the feed line between the
Balun and the tuner.
The higher the mismatch, the higher the feedline loss.
Let's say you're operating on 14.300 MHz, and your wire is roughly 9.85
In my opinion, what you want is the lowest SWR on the feed line between
the Balun and the tuner.
The higher the mismatch, the higher the feedline loss.
Let's say you're operating on 14.300 MHz, and your wire is roughly 9.85
meters (32' 4") long.
If I did the math right, that's pretty much
Holger,
Your question was indeed crystal clear, so I am sorry that you had to make
this experience.
Don't worry and have fun!
BTW, I suspect that the tuning algorithm used by Wayne for all the AT of
Elecraft does start his try with the minimum inductance (unknown from
competitive reasons, hi)?
Holger Schurig-2 wrote
> I have an end-fed antenna with some random wire. The UNUN at one end of it
> has three sockets to plug the random wire in: 1:4, 1:9 and 1:16.
>
> My KX3 has the built-in ATU.
> I now want to find out on which band I best use which one of the sockets.
>
> Am I right to
2016-09-30 21:59 GMT+02:00 Fred Jensen :
> This is reminiscent of one of the five volumes in Douglas Adams' trilogy,
> "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy."
I understand that either my english is very weird. Or that I can't explain
things good.
But that you and Davidthink
>
> You will have to get more specific about the wire lengths and the band(s)
> of operation for specific answers
Nope. I don't have.
My question was really: is it desirable to always aim for the lowest
inductance of an ATU tuning. AFAIK this question is totally independent
from the wire
Yes ... and forty three is held in reverence by others who attribute
magical properties to it. :-)
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Sparks NV DM09dn
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2016
- www.cqp.org
On 9/30/2016 1:22 PM, David Kuechenmeister wrote:
I think 42 might be
I think 42 might be a valid answer, depending on the question. Forty-one is
certainly a good answer!
There are a couple pages that try to address the question of what long wire
lengths are the easiest to tune, i.e. present a low SWR to the matching unit.
The first is at
Let me see if I understand the question: You're looking for a simple
algorithm to tell you how to "best" deploy a wire of indeterminate
length in a configuration yet to be specified using a transformer of
indefinite impedance ratio on any of a number of unnamed bands.
This is reminiscent of
Maybe I'm missing something, but you have a selection of taps, the
highest is 16:1.
If the wire is exactly 1/2 wave, then the impedance is going to be very
high, and the 16:1 tap will come closest to matching a high impedance load.
If the wire is some multiple of 1/4 wave but not a an even
Holger,
There are many answers to your questions. You will have to get more
specific about the wire lengths and the band(s) of operation for
specific answers.
If you want an easy antenna that will work for 40 thru 10 meters with no
feedline, download the KXAT1 manual from Elecraft and look
If you are working QRP, take a look at
http://www.qrpproject.de/UK/atu.htm
This describes the 'Fuchs' half wave antenna and a matching unit in kit
form. I have built this, very compact, it works well, gives a good
indication of optimum tune adjustment and is not totally dependent on a
good
> Then I should go for the highest impedance and select 1:16, should I?
I meant antenna impedance, not the impedance of the internal ATU
inductor.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
Fred Jensen writes:
> How long is the wire?
> What band?
Who knowns? I'm not asking for a *specific* optimization, I'm asking
for a general rule of thumb.
I'm not talking about a permanent installation, I'm talking about going
to some field, or hill. I don't know the band
This discussion makes me wonder if the ARRL Handbook and the ARRL
Antenna Book have somehow been banned! This is BASIC antennas, guys.
This is not CB radio, it is ham radio, and we're supposed to be able to
study this stuff and figure it out! Building antennas is one the
easiest parts of ham
ecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] how to optimize end-fed?
Mel,
Your points are well taken when you are feeding an end-fed half wave or a
radiator of a multiple of a half wave.
The ideal parallel tank circuit should be fed with a coupling coil that is
isolated from the larger secondary coil
Mel,
Your points are well taken when you are feeding an end-fed half wave or
a radiator of a multiple of a half wave.
The ideal parallel tank circuit should be fed with a coupling coil that
is isolated from the larger secondary coil - that reduces or eliminates
common mode currents in the
:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] how to optimize end-fed?
> Am I right to assume that the ATU settings with the lowest L is
> always the best?
I don't know exactly what you mean by "best," but you said "always" so
I'd say no. If the length of your wire is in the vicinity o
> Am I right to assume that the ATU settings with the lowest L is
> always the best?
I don't know exactly what you mean by "best," but you said "always" so
I'd say no. If the length of your wire is in the vicinity of n * 90
degrees where n is any odd integer, it will have a low-ish impedance
Hi all,
I have an end-fed antenna with some random wire. The UNUN at one end of it
has three sockets to plug the random wire in: 1:4, 1:9 and 1:16.
My KX3 has the built-in ATU.
I now want to find out on which band I best use which one of the sockets.
As a first step, I wrote a simple program
24 matches
Mail list logo