Re: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Tom Hammond
Hi Dave: The best 'decoder' is still between your ears!!! Most (other than VERY specialized) decoders will get really confused when they ear more than one in-band signal... so trying to use a decoder in most CW contests is pretty much useless. I remember when I was starting out contesting

RE: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Darwin, Keith
I believe most of them are indeed copying what is being sent. Most of the stations I hear in a big contest are the big contesters. They have big money invested in big equipment and they have lots of experience and skill. I suspect serious CW contesters have no problems with contest exchanges at

Re: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
My experience of trying to use the MFJ with my FT-857 is that it has to be very good, clear Morse for it to work. I'm still learning, so I'm not good enough yet to receive correctly, let alone send. But the MFJ just shows rubbish or doesn't understand it at all. On 5/11/07 13:26, David Wilburn

Re: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Julian G4ILO
The best decoder is certainly not the one between *my* ears! I have tried just about every method going to try to be able to read Morse comfortably at 25wpm or more, with no success at all. If anything I am getting worse with the advancing years! Although I can read most individual characters at

Re: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Julian G4ILO
I've never tried the MFJ, though I was tempted to get one. On Windows PCs, the CW decoder in MixW is pretty poor. About the best is CWGet, as long as you manually set the threshold to above the level of noise. However, all DSP based Morse decoders only work when you click on the exact centre of

Re: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread David Wilburn
A friend has the MFJ pocket decoder. I have tried it. It is not perfect, but if you connect it to the radio instead of just audio, it works better. And with the filters in the K2, I can drill down to the signals I want. My thoughts were that most were sending electronically, as you mentioned,

RE: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Craig Rairdin
What blew me away trying to get into my third CW contest was the speed everyone was running. Additionally I had not dealt with sequential exchanges before, and wanted to listen to one first to get the feel of the exchange. But it was all too fast. The concept of answering folks at

RE: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread David Wilburn
Well said, and understanding the exchange is the initial difficulty I was having. I couldn't find anyone going slow enough to understand how the exchange was handled. Many folks put NR in front of the sequential number, which is a big help for us newbies. About half didn't. Some may be looking

RE: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Lee Buller
What a nice threadspares me the crazy emails about shipping dates and how one feels about all that. Patience is a virtue Tom is rightbest decoder is the REIP and LEIP. Right Ear Input Port and Left Ear Input Port going through the fastest computer made today with the results

RE: [Elecraft] [OT] CW speed and decoders and SS

2007-11-05 Thread Carl Clawson
Patience is a virtue Patience (n) A minor form of despair, disguised as a virtue. - Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary. ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info