On 28/04/2021 07:35, Bastien wrote:
> Do you still see differences between the doc/org-manual.org and the
> one published on https://orgmode.org/manual/ ?
>
> If so, please point at one or two differences. Thanks!
>
These two sections are older versions that what is in doc/org-manual.org
http
On 08/04/2021 10:29, Guillaume MULLER wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently sent an email on this mailing list (see
> https://orgmode.org/list/b1e778c5-acbf-8a17-c9bf-dcb6693e9...@univ-st-etienne.fr/
> )
>
> Since then, I'm receiving spams on the email address I used to send the
> message.
>
> Afte
On 02/04/2021 17:54, Husain Alshehhi wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I just noticed that some of us here, when replying, include the email of
> the sender of the previous email in the response as part of body of the
> email. This email address shows up in plain text in the mailing
> list[1]. This is ce
On 18/03/2021 14:38, Atlas Cove wrote:
>> technically the second table is more space efficient than the first
>
> I was referring to screen space.
Assuming that you are looking at this with a monospaced font (and I
don't see how you could use a variable width font to look at an Org
table effectiv
On 17/03/2021 21:29, Atlas Cove wrote:
> Allow me to give an example of the updated syntax I propose.
>
> ```
> | Name | Description| Price |
> |--++---|
> | Orange Juice | Very Citrusy! Very \\ | 5.00 |
> | | nice indeed!
Hello Robin,
from this patch I infer that you work with SAP. Can I bug you off-list
with a few questions unrelated to org-mode but related to
programmatically interact with SAP?
Thank you.
Best,
Dan
On 04/02/2021 08:55, Robin Campbell Joy wrote:
> * lisp/ob-sql.el (org-babel-execute:sql, org-ba
On 02/02/2021 10:54, TEC wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Google's SoC organisation applications are currently open, and close on
> <2020-02-20>. I know that Org participated once, in 2012.
>
> Would it be a good idea to submit an application to do so again?
> With the rise in interest in computational no
On 12/01/2021 21:21, TRS-80 wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I just banged out a bit of Elisp implementing a new Orgmode link type
> for navigating Ordered (i.e., numbered/lettered) Plain Lists.[0]
How do you deal with the lists being re-numbered when you edit them?
Cheers,
Dan
On 04/01/2021 21:04, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>>> "DN" == Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 04/01/2021 09:54, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-ledger.html
>
On 04/01/2021 09:54, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-ledger.html
>
> Points out how to use ledger within org mode.
>
> Is there any simpler solution?
As other pointed out, you are not describing what you want to
accomplish, thus is impossi
On 02/01/2021 14:49, John Kitchin wrote:
> Recently I have had an issue where multiple functions may store a link,
> e.g. to a bibtex entry.
>
> In this case, org-mode seems to prompt me to ask which function to store
> the link with, with an initial input of the first function, which masks
> al
On 28/12/2020 20:36, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Hongyi Zhao [2020-12-28 18:19]:
>> Is it possible for me to edit Microsoft Excel spreadsheet directly
>> from within emacs, especially utilizing the powerful capabilities of
>> orgmode?
>
> You have high expectations but Emacs Org mode does not nearly re
On 19/12/2020 21:27, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know a package which would allow, using say gnus, to
> markdown-ise an email, that would be useful for sending email to github
> issues.
As far as I know, GitHub does not interpret Mardown in comments added to
issues via the email i
On 15/12/2020 14:58, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Monday, 14 Dec 2020 at 20:49, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
>>> I like testing Emacs on the trunk and I ‘git pull’ and ‘make bootstrap’
>>> daily and use it without any external packages. This is just to make
>>> sure that any extern
On 25/11/2020 05:37, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I always found the description of Lisp forms in Org table formulas not
>> extremely clear, especially in regard to the use of mode flags. The
>> attached patch tries to c
Thank you for the review, Kyle.
Another updated patch set is attached.
Cheers,
Dan
On 24/11/2020 06:35, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] org-table: Remove unused org-tbl-calc-modes variable
>> declaration
>
> Looks good.
>
An updated patch series is attached.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Dan
From d2ab4d06e19620c0347425861e4534cde8656543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:44:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] org-table: Remove unused org-tbl-calc-modes variable
declaration
* org-table.el
On 23/11/2020 23:25, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 23/11/2020 04:14, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>>> You already mentioned that you plan to add documentation. It'd also be
>>> good to add a test to test-org-table.el and a NEWS entry.
>>
&g
On 23/11/2020 04:14, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> You already mentioned that you plan to add documentation. It'd also be
> good to add a test to test-org-table.el and a NEWS entry.
By the way, have you seen my other patch with some documentation updates
for Org tables?
Cheers,
Dan
Hello Kyle,
thank you for the review. It is much appreciated as lisp (and Emacs lisp
in particular) is not the language I am most fluent in.
On 23/11/2020 04:14, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] org-table: Fix table formula mode string handling
On 19/11/2020 06:58, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I don't think this is what is holding up review of these patches, but, I
>> recently completed the paperwork for copyright assignment to the FSF.
>
> Thanks for this serie
On 17/11/2020 21:15, Boruch Baum wrote:
> On 2020-11-17 20:51, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Please complain with the Emacs maintainers about their handling of the
>> bugs on the Emacs bug tracking system,
>
> How do I know it was "their handling" and not "your ha
On 17/11/2020 19:41, Boruch Baum wrote:
> A little over a month ago, I submitted several bug reports related to
> org-mode, and sor most of them haven't seen any action whatsoever, not
> even an indication that they were noticed. In many cases, I provided
> either a total solution or a suggested im
On 16/11/2020 11:25, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Daniele,
>
> this looks good. One minor pedantic point: I think you mean
> "interpreted" when you say "interpolated" (several times in the
> text). Otherwise, this is a very useful addition to the manual.
Thank you for reading and for the comment.
"in
aad5ba2217c30ff219069afbfdd8c65851f899d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 18:33:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc/org-manual.org: Extend table formulas Lisp form
documentation
Be more explicit about how fields are interpolated into the Lisp
forms, clarify the use of mode
On 13/11/2020 15:39, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> How are variables passed to the code block supposed to be handled? The
> macro docstring does not mention anything particular, thus I would
> imagine they are handled just like in any other lisp code. However, this
> does not seem to
Hello,
I am trying to use the org-sbe macro to execute a code block with input
from an org table, however it does not work as I would expect it to work
and the code is cryptic enough for me to not being able to understand
what the intent was when it was written. I searched for tests in the
codebas
On 11/11/2020 10:15, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Daniele,
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Would it make sense to have one "official" (or a set of) org-mode test
>> files and the corresponding syntax tree as parsed by org-elements (maybe
>> in a format easier
Hello,
I am trying to use the org-sbe macro to compute values in an org table.
This results in a (well, actually two, see my other recent email to the
mailing list) prompt for execution of the relevant code block. This is
unpractical when there are more than an handful of cells to be evaluated.
I
On 09/11/2020 15:04, Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> 2020-11-08 Jean Louis wrote:
>> That is right, I am using it since years in ~/.mailcap that works well
>> for mutt email client.
>>
>> text/org;emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org;
>> text/x-org; emacsclient %s; nametemplate=%s.org;
>
> Just for cur
Hello,
using the org-sbe macro to evaluate a code block with table cells as
input results in two prompts for each cell evaluated: one to confirm the
evaluation of the code block passed as an argument to org-sbe and one to
confirm evaluation of the code block dynamically generated by org-sbe.
Is t
Hello,
I don't think this is what is holding up review of these patches, but, I
recently completed the paperwork for copyright assignment to the FSF.
Cheers,
Dan
On 24/10/2020 17:33, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached there are a few patches reworking the parsin
On 02/11/2020 10:02, TEC wrote:
> I think there are absolutely some benefits for Org users. I am
> personally interested in registering Org as an IANA MIME type.
I don't think that registering Org as IANA MIME type will have the
consequences you hope it has.
> What will this do? Well, for starter
On 02/11/2020 00:10, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>> Maybe the standardization should cover only the "static" parts of Org
>> (ie no table formulas, no babel, no agenda, no exporters, etc). However,
>> in this case, what
On 01/11/2020 17:13, Russell Adams wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 08:22:01PM -0400, Asa Zeren wrote:
>> First, I would like to repeat the importance of developing standards
>> for org-mode. If we want to expand the influence of org, tooling must
>> expand beyond Emacs.
>
> I disagree. There are
On 31/10/2020 17:49, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> i saw a few reports of bugs related to folding and unfolding of
>> headlines recently, but I think this is not a duplicate.
>
> I think you're referring to
>
>
On 31/10/2020 17:28, Russell Adams wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> I just noticed that with the latest release (Org mode version 9.4
>> (9.4-27-g47bf60-elpa @ /Users/daniele/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20201026/)
>> unfolding of headlines is
Hello,
i saw a few reports of bugs related to folding and unfolding of
headlines recently, but I think this is not a duplicate.
I just noticed that with the latest release (Org mode version 9.4
(9.4-27-g47bf60-elpa @ /Users/daniele/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20201026/)
unfolding of headlines is broken by
On 30/10/2020 05:57, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I found an inconsistency between the manual and implementation: the
>> Priorities section says that the range of valid priorities can be set
>> modifying the `org-priority
Hello,
I found an inconsistency between the manual and implementation: the
Priorities section says that the range of valid priorities can be set
modifying the `org-priority-highest', `org-priority-lowest' and
`org-priority-default' variables. However, in the code the variables
names are `org-highe
On 28/10/2020 17:59, TEC wrote:
>
> Let's do two at once:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Great work! it looks very nice and informative at the same time.
> That's the idea! :D
>
>> If I can bikeshed a bit more: I like the lighter page
On 28/10/2020 13:25, TEC wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> - (minor) I would add a background to the example in the home
>> page to
>> make it stand out more as an example org-mode syntax buffer
>>
>> - (very minor) why does the example on the home
On 26/10/2020 15:26, TEC wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> I like the new design. Thank you for your work!
>
> Thanks for the kind words!
>
>> Two things:
> *cough, Three 😆
Indeed, I thought about the third one while writing the first two...
>&g
On 26/10/2020 14:54, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26/10/2020 11:27, TEC wrote:
>>
>> TEC writes:
>>
>>> there are a few teething issues that have appeared when
>>> deploying the
>>> site on orgmode.org.
>>
>> These issues have now bee
On 26/10/2020 11:27, TEC wrote:
>
> TEC writes:
>
>> there are a few teething issues that have appeared when
>> deploying the
>> site on orgmode.org.
>
> These issues have now been fixed! Go wild :P
>
> I've taken the liberty of making a post on reddit:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/commen
On 23/09/2020 10:09, Bastien wrote:
> I disagree that a parser is too difficult to maintain because Org is
> a moving target. Org core syntax is not moving anymore, a parser can
> reasonably target it. That's what is done with the Ruby parser, in
> use in this small project called github.com :)
,
Dan
From c7434974897d932fe3acd182f06a98a61719e208 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:03:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] org-table: Fix table formula mode string handling
* lisp/org-table.el (org-table-eval-formula): Move mode lookup table
from org-table--set-calc-mo
/2020 15:30, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> attached there are a few patches reworking the code, fixing the bug, and
> introducing a new mode flag to enable Calc's units simplification mode
> as discussed in a recent thread on the mailing list. I haven't updated
&g
On 20/10/2020 16:32, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 20/10/2020 16:19, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Hello again,
>>
>> Following up on myself. I'm seeing some strange behaviour although unit
>> calculations are working nicely. For instance, this table:
>>
On 20/10/2020 16:19, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Following up on myself. I'm seeing some strange behaviour although unit
> calculations are working nicely. For instance, this table:
>
> #+begin_src org
> | stream | a| b| c| total|
>
On 20/10/2020 15:44, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Just to say that I have done a quick test with this and I really like
> it. Simple calculations with units of mol/s and mol/min work perfectly.
Thank you for testing Eric.
To cover the use case of monetary quantities discussed in the other
thread I woul
is a
good idea.
Cheers,
Dan
On 19/10/2020 17:38, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am hacking org-table-eval-formula (see thread about monetary values in
> org-tables) which uses this inline function:
>
> (defsubst org-table--set-calc-mode (var &optional value)
>
Hello,
I am looking at the parsing of org-table formula mode strings and I find
it quite confusing and I have an hard time understanding if it works the
way it does by design or by accident.
Formula mode strings are documented here
https://orgmode.org/manual/Formula-syntax-for-Calc.html#Formula-
Hello,
I am hacking org-table-eval-formula (see thread about monetary values in
org-tables) which uses this inline function:
(defsubst org-table--set-calc-mode (var &optional value)
(if (stringp var)
(setq var (assoc var '(("D" calc-angle-mode deg)
("R" calc-a
On 12/10/2020 10:22, Christian Moe wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniele,
>
> Good that it's working for you. I'll try to explain the unclear parts.
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 24/09/2020 11:17, Christian Moe wrote:
>>
>>> Now, with the Ca
Hello Christian,
thank you for your input. calc support for units indeed covers the
basics of working with currencies. I gave it a spin on some notes I have
been working on recently. While some things work very nicely, other are
a bit ugly. It is a good start and I'll explore this approach more.
On 25/09/2020 11:25, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Aside: Perhaps I'm misunderstanding them, but none of the open source
> tools, including (h)ledger, seem to be of much help here.
> - They focus on data entry and reconciliation, which I don't need as I'm
> happy to download and use OFX files from my bank.
On 23/09/2020 18:55, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Not answering your question directly but, depending on why and how you
> are using org tables for monetary calculations, you may wish to look at
> ledger [1]. There is support in org for ledger via babel (ob-ledger.el,
> distributed with org).
Hello Eric
Hello,
I often use org-tables to work with monetary amounts. It would be very
nice to have a couple of functionalities common in this domain:
- fixed precision arithmetic, namely derive the precision of the results
from the precision of the arguments (I think that calc can do this),
- support fo
Hello,
I would like to create links from an org-mode file to source file
locations that display a preview of the link destination in the form of
a source code block or similar with a few lines of the file content.
Is this doable with org-store-link and org-insert-link?
A related question: does a
Hello,
org-mode fails to recognize https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(89)90087-2
as a valid URL, it breaks it after the closing parenthesis ). I don't
understand why this is the case as I would imagine that if the )
character is not allowed in URLs the link would be broken before it and
not after.
Hello,
On 30-04-2020 14:28, tbanelwebmin wrote:
> * Version 9.4 (not yet released)
> ** Miscellaneous
> *** Faster org-table-to-lisp
>
> The new implementation can be more than 100 times faster. This enhances
> responsiveness of Babel or Gnuplot blocks handling thousands long tables.
Nitpicking:
On 09-04-2020 13:43, John Kitchin wrote:
> This is basically what doi-add-bibtex-entry does. There isn't one
> function that does arxiv too, but there is arxiv-add-bibtex-entry. Those
> are both commands in org-ref. These don't pop up a buffer for approval,
> that is something you would have to bui
Hello John,
sorry for the cryptic subject but I was unable to come up with something
better. I am revamping my workflow to take notes about articles I read
or that I save to be read later and I decided to explore if org-ref and
the related utility packages fit what I would like to be able to do.
On 20/02/2020 00:15, Bastien wrote:
> Days for the "contrib/" directory are counted: before Org 9.5, I will
> extract it from Org's repository, make it an independant repository on
> code.orgmode.org and make it available through Org ELPA.
This is an excellent plan!
Cheers,
Dan
On 30/10/2019 23:03, adam wrote:
>
> Has the emacs-orgmode mail-list ceased including a [O] in the subject
> line of its mails? Or, what has changed here?
Yes, as announced on the list a couple of days ago.
> I was using [O] as a filter for my incoming mails, now they are
> turning up u
On 25/06/2019 22:54, Spenser Truex wrote:
> "Fraga, Eric" writes:
>
>> On Tuesday, 25 Jun 2019 at 18:41, gmx wrote:
>>> How to insert the current time?
>>
>> Easiest immediate way is to insert an inactive time stamp by C-u C-c !
>> RET.
>
> Robert Pluim writes:
>
>> C-u M-x org-time-stamp
>>
On 11-03-2019 10:35, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 10/03/2019 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>> When in doubt, use the function ~org-link-escape~ in order to turn
>>> a link string into its properly escaped
On 10/03/2019 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> When in doubt, use the function ~org-link-escape~ in order to turn
> a link string into its properly escaped form.
>
> The old ~org-link-escape~ and ~org-link-unescape~ functions have
> been renamed into ~org-link-encode~ and ~org-link-
Hello,
there is a feature of Orgzly that I like: when a headline containing
sub-haedlines is folded, the leading star (bullet in Orgzly interface)
changes to signal that subheadings are hidden below.
I've tried to see if org allows to easily achieve something similar, but
the face of the headline
Hello,
I'm not always very systematic in my note taking and sometimes I find
the need to refile entries into a datetree. Unfortunately `org-refile`
does not provide facilities for doing that easily. `org-archive` kind of
does, but it does not allow to easily specify the target date.
I saw a fe
On 08/04/2018 11:33, Rasmus wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 08/04/2018 07:27, Rasmus wrote:
>>> I have been wanting to clean up org-faces.el for a couple of years.
>>
>> Only tangentially related: is there a way to have a different face for
>>
On 08/04/2018 07:27, Rasmus wrote:
> I have been wanting to clean up org-faces.el for a couple of years.
Only tangentially related: is there a way to have a different face for
tables content and tables structure (ie the grid)? The default blue
hurts my eyes :-)
Cheers,
Dan
On 4/5/17 3:40 PM, Bruce V Chiarelli wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 4/4/17 1:25 PM, Bruce V Chiarelli wrote:
>>>
>>> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> I modified your code as follow to be able to insert a datetree entry
On 4/4/17 1:25 PM, Bruce V Chiarelli wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>>
>> thanks for the hint, but I don't understand what `subtree-at-point` is
>> in your code, it does not seem to be defined in my emacs and
>> `org-datetree-find-date-create` has a
On 4/4/17 1:25 PM, Bruce V Chiarelli wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>>
>> thanks for the hint, but I don't understand what `subtree-at-point` is
>> in your code, it does not seem to be defined in my emacs and
>> `org-datetree-find-date-create` has a
On 4/3/17 5:37 PM, Bruce V Chiarelli wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is a way in org-mode to insert a datetree entry without going
>> through the org-capture? Ideally the function would jump to the
>> datetree and inser an hea
Hello,
there is a way in org-mode to insert a datetree entry without going
through the org-capture? Ideally the function would jump to the
datetree and inser an headline for the current day if one is not
present, or move to the end of it if one is present.
I haven't found anything like this in t
ot possible with org-insert-link. I may propose a patch to
add this.
Cheers,
Daniele
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 10/13/16 8:14 AM, John Kitchin wrote:
>>> In org8, this is not that easy to do, but not impossible.
>>>
>>> Why do not you wan
On 10/13/16 6:07 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Does this solve your problem? :)
>
> Not really. It makes my example more bearable, but using C-a is still
> a workaround, and there are also many other dances to perform in various
> other
uct
org-insert-link to derive a default value for the description from the
path? I had a look at the code, and it does not seem so.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Daniele
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to add a new link type to org-mode. Following the exam
On 10/12/16 4:37 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> I use org-insert-link [C-c C-l] to edit links. I think this solved your
>> problem with the difficulty in editing the link description.
>
> No, it doesn't. The problem also
On 05/10/16 09:40, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to make the following change to bracket links display (i.e.,
> when `org-highlight-links' contains `bracket', which is the default).
>
> Basically, I want to leave a visible pair of brackets around the link,
I don't like the bracket
Hello,
I would like to add a new link type to org-mode. Following the example
in the manual it is a very easy task. However I would like to customize
how the link is visualized, specifically I would like a link like
"[[foo:bar]]" to be visualized simply as "bar" where the protocol type
has been
On 4/7/16 1:15 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> when exporting to LaTeX, numbers expressed in engineering notation
>> contained in tables are transformed into a quite confusing notation:
>> 1.234e5 becomes 1.234\,(5) which is
Hello,
when exporting to LaTeX, numbers expressed in engineering notation
contained in tables are transformed into a quite confusing notation:
1.234e5 becomes 1.234\,(5) which is rendered by LaTeX as 1.234 (5) with
the space being a very narrow one. This notation is confusing because it
is usually
On 27/07/15 18:59, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> On 2015-07-27, at 14:39, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Therefore, the only extensions to org-mode that can exist (and be
>> distributed, if you write code and keep it for yourself you are not
>> affected by the licensing terms) must b
On 27/07/15 20:20, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
> On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>
>> On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>>> That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
>>> that I explicitly state th
On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
> that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live in. (Mind
> you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm very far from that. But this system
> is almost unbearable.)
This st
On 27/07/15 14:42, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>>> I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
>>> A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or ev
On 27/07/15 14:25, Oleh Krehel wrote:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Oleh Krehel writes:
>>
>>> If anywhere in your code there's (require 'org), you have to release
>>> your code under GPL.
>>
>> Are you sure about that? By this logic, *any* .el file should be GPL as
>> they use (defun ·), implicitly lo
Hello Marcin,
On 27/07/15 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
> won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
> writing a tutorial on them, and I consider publishing a *tutorial* with
> GPL'd code a Bad
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
> A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
> copy). Such things should definitely be in PD.
As yourself pointed out in one of your emails, in many legal
ordina
93 matches
Mail list logo