On 10/13/16 6:07 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Daniele Nicolodi <dani...@grinta.net> writes: > >> Does this solve your problem? :) > > Not really. It makes my example more bearable, but using C-a is still > a workaround, and there are also many other dances to perform in various > other cases. So, I still think there is an usability issue that needs to > be fixed. > > As another data point, `org-hide-emphasis-markers' is nil by default, > because emphasized text can be a pain to edit when this variable is > non-nil. I don't think links should go the opposite way.
Hi Nicolas, I understand the problem and I agree that editing links and text around them is not always straightforward. However I think that what you are proposing is a change in behavior that does not strictly solve a technical problem. As such, I believe, having the [ ] markers should be an option, and probably not enabled by default. Cheers, Daniele
