Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
I have two issues with linking to equations.
Consider the following example:
\begin{alinged}
\Label{eq:1}
\min f(x)\\
\label{eq:2}
\st c(x)=0
\end{aligned}
Insightful comments on [[eq:1]] and [[eq:2]]
* Issue 1
If
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
For the problem at hand, you can use \label{eq:2} directly in the
document.
Less pretty and I can't click on it. [For me a custom link type is fine,
but every line of customization makes it harder to reproduce down the
road].
Anyway, I found out
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
It really seems overkill. Note that you can write ([[eq1]]), too.
What I tried to say in the first email. If I add my patch, which indeed
just adds a clause to org-latex-link, it would break documents which uses
the above.
Regarding the
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
I definitely think it is the more proper way to refer to an equation. But
it really depends on the document. E.g. mathtools also offer a set of
commands for referring to equations. I was considering an alist of
(DESTINATION-TYPE REF-CMD-WITH-DESCRIPTION
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
It really seems overkill. Note that you can write ([[eq1]]), too.
What I tried to say in the first email. If I add my patch, which indeed
just adds a clause to org-latex-link, it would break documents which uses
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
It would appear as, e.g., ((2)) indeed.
So what's the verdict? The upside is that \eqref{·} is more robust.
and *why* is orgmode.org hosting it? Privacy?
I don't think CDN service was available at the time mathjax support was
implemented.
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
So what's the verdict? The upside is that \eqref{·} is more robust.
Your call. You face the consequences. Alone.
I think this is safe to make the change as long as there is a ORG-NEWS
entry. Of course, I never wrote that last sentence.
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
It would appear as, e.g., ((2)) indeed.
So what's the verdict? The upside is that \eqref{·} is more robust.
Your call. You face the consequences. Alone.
I think this is safe to make the change as long as there is a ORG-NEWS
entry. Of course, I never wrote that
Hi,
I have two issues with linking to equations.
Consider the following example:
\begin{alinged}
\Label{eq:1}
\min f(x)\\
\label{eq:2}
\st c(x)=0
\end{aligned}
Insightful comments on [[eq:1]] and [[eq:2]]
* Issue 1
If org-link-search-must-match-exact-headline is
