On 16 May 2013 03:19, Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
So either I add code to G10 L10 to redirect if the the lathe switch is active,
or we abandon Fanuc a bit and put the geometry offsets in T01 instead of
T10001
(so the opposite).
At this point I really start to wonder how
On 15 May 2013 05:08, John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
Michael and I have a room reserved at the Motel 6.
I just booked in at the Hampton.
http://hamptoninn3.hilton.com/en/hotels/kansas/hampton-inn-wichita-west-airport-area-ICTKSHX/index.html
It seems a little more readily walkable to/from
I plan on using the userinit section for parsing command line options. This
is where I plan to allow users to specify modbus connection parameters. Is
that the preferred way to configure the driver?
I did not intend to check in wj200_vfd.c. I looked at my repository on
github, and it doesn't
On 5/16/2013 1:08 AM, Chris Morley wrote:
At this point I really start to wonder how often G10 L10 P10001 is used in
current
lathe Gcode and start to consider other alternatives such as P01 for
geometry, P0101 for wear
etc. - It really makes it easier if the geometry offsets are under the
On 16 May 2013 13:37, Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of ignorance, I ask - what existing G-code? Are we talking about
I meant G-code as understood by LinuxCNC today. ie, where a tool
change is M6 T3 G43 H4 not T0304.
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
To some degree, Fanuc G code is an industry standard in the US, even
though there are different versions of the same standard (no, this does
not make any sense) within Fanuc's own products.
I am sure that Tormach gets constant requests for a more Fanuc like G
code even if it does not entirely
I am more interesting in doing things better, and more efficiently. If
doing things the Fanuc way is an improvement, fine. If not, lets not
go there.
Fanuc, HAAS, etc. have decades of experience and teams of very bright people
looking into how and why to do things the way they do them -
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 12:15:07 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] LinuxCNC week at MPM/SFI
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
CAN1+YZXTWrH6jXLhyqBdKnDf0oB6-YVkNmTsTx5ZMw-=
7vy...@mail.gmail.com
On 5/16/2013 7:15 AM, andy pugh wrote:
It seems a little more readily walkable to/from MPM than does the Candlewood.
(Though I understand that being a pedestrian is illegal in the US:-)
It might seem like that but some of us stubbornly walk as much as we
can. I purposely chose a townhouse
On 5/16/2013 9:00 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 16 May 2013 13:37, Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of ignorance, I ask - what existing G-code? Are we talking about
I meant G-code as understood by LinuxCNC today. ie, where a tool
change is M6 T3 G43 H4 not T0304.
Ah, yes. I went a
On 5/16/2013 9:28 AM, Daniel Rogge wrote:
I am more interesting in doing things better, and more efficiently. If
doing things the Fanuc way is an improvement, fine. If not, lets not
go there.
Fanuc, HAAS, etc. have decades of experience and teams of very bright people
looking
Hi,
I've been reading and thinking about this thread; I'd like to offer up
my 2 cents worth -
I have interest in making LCNC as easy to adopt and use as possible.
This interest has lead me to I've spend a fair amount of time thinking
about what aspects of LCNC assist or hinder LCNC adoption.
On 16 May 2013 17:14, David Bagby d...@calypsoventures.com wrote:
I believe that the benefits from implementing standard fanuc gcode far
out weigh any internal LCNC implementation considerations. Thus when I
read (paraphrasing) that the Fanuc lathe tool change style is hard to
fit into the
Are there any possible patent infringement situations that could result
by cloning Fanuc's CNC machine coding style entirely??
I wonder if Haas and others pay any type of licensing fees to Fanuc?
Art Fennerty of Mach3 fame told me one time that he altered something
within Mach3 as an attempt to
wouldn't those patents be long expired?
sam
On 05/16/2013 12:04 PM, Dave wrote:
Are there any possible patent infringement situations that could result
by cloning Fanuc's CNC machine coding style entirely??
I wonder if Haas and others pay any type of licensing fees to Fanuc?
Art Fennerty of
On May 16 2013 12:10 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 05/16/2013 07:15 AM, andy pugh wrote:
(Though I understand that being a pedestrian is illegal in the US
:-)
Yes, that's correct -- only trucks and Harley-Davidson motorcycles
are
allowed here.
Also, make sure to leave some room in
On 05/16/2013 07:15 AM, andy pugh wrote:
(Though I understand that being a pedestrian is illegal in the US :-)
Yes, that's correct -- only trucks and Harley-Davidson motorcycles are
allowed here.
Also, make sure to leave some room in your luggage, you will be issued a
handgun when you come in
On 16 May 2013 21:22, John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
That webpage, under 'amenities', says they do indeed have free wifi. Whew!
The online reviews are less than stellar:
http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Review-g39143-d244095-Reviews-Motel_6_Wichita-Wichita_Kansas.html
--
atp
If you
On 05/16/2013 03:34 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 16 May 2013 21:22, John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
That webpage, under 'amenities', says they do indeed have free wifi. Whew!
The online reviews are less than stellar:
Andy:
Thanks for responding
I have been thinking about this quite a lot (and it is probably worth
having a look at the discussion on
http://psha.org.ru/irc/%23emc-devel/2013-05-15.html#21:42:42
(though it might be worth donning a thick skin).
I did read that. I find it disheartening that
On 17 May 2013 00:13, Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
You don't seem to under stand the reason for the patch is more about
doing things like a cnc Lathe operator expects
The lathe-patch is not what I am trying to talk about in this thread.
I changed the email subject to try to
John Morris wrote:
http://www.motel6.com/reservations/motel_detail.aspx?num=4334
Yes, Wed-Sun for Michael, Wed-Mon for me.
That webpage, under 'amenities', says they do indeed have free wifi. Whew!
THANKS! I just booked my reservation there, I'll be arriving Monday
evening the
17th,
andy pugh wrote:
On 16 May 2013 21:22, John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
That webpage, under 'amenities', says they do indeed have free wifi. Whew!
The online reviews are less than stellar:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 21:22 -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
John Morris wrote:
http://www.motel6.com/reservations/motel_detail.aspx?num=4334
Yes, Wed-Sun for Michael, Wed-Mon for me.
That webpage, under 'amenities', says they do indeed have free wifi. Whew!
THANKS! I just booked my
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 23:03 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote:
On 5/16/2013 7:13 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
Filters and remapping are not reasonable alternatives.
Chris, I apologize for muddying the water. I threw out those notions
based on a misunderstanding of one of Andy's messages (UK and
25 matches
Mail list logo
