I see that 2.8 has lots of work in it.
I think a release of it is warranted.
Chris
From: andy pugh
Sent: March 31, 2022 7:30 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Plan for 2.9 release
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attac
[Steffen Möller]
> Ah, famous SebKuminsky is behind it on
> https://github.com/SebKuzminsky/pycam/releases - that makes it two. I
> just saw that someone Petter already sent in patches who is a Debian
> Developer - @petter, I made the lighthearted promise to package CAM to
> augment the CNC
So with the changes Stefan made, I can confirm that Linuxcnc will build
both debs and RIP on the 5.16 unstable kernel.
I still can't install from the debian repositories.
Lets continue the conversation about this issue here
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/1692
Le ven. 1 avr. 2022 à 21:31, Chris Morley a
écrit :
>
> Whether we release on Debians schedule or our own, with ISO or not, we
> still need to plan to have the code as bug free as possible which takes
> time for testing after merging big code chucks in.
>
>
This is THE LAW ;-)
>I'm suggesting we try to plan a bit better and maybe release more often.
>>If Linuxcnc is seriously committing to deploy the project using the Debian
>>repositories
>>the Linuxcnc release schedule is set for us now by the Debian release
>>schedule.
Whether we release on Debians schedule or
On 01.04.22 19:51, gene heskett wrote:
On Friday, 1 April 2022 13:19:55 EDT Steffen Möller wrote:
On 01.04.22 19:16, gene heskett wrote:
I'm getting sorta familiar with OpenSCAD, but I'm feeding a 3d
printer
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openscad
available
As I wrote, thats very old,
On Friday, 1 April 2022 06:27:32 EDT Rod Webster wrote:
> Steffan,
> Thanks for the background and update.
> Sometimes I think I must be the only one playing with Sid and the
> Debian packages.
> It's now quite dated. It's a bit frustrating that you have to then
> compile Linuxcnc to get the
On Friday, 1 April 2022 13:19:55 EDT Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 01.04.22 19:16, gene heskett wrote:
> > I'm getting sorta familiar with OpenSCAD, but I'm feeding a 3d
> > printer
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openscad
>
> available
>
As I wrote, thats very old, much slower code than the
On Friday, 1 April 2022 11:04:09 EDT Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 01.04.22 16:59, Hans Unzner wrote:
> > Regarding the CAM software:
> > It feels for me a bit like everyone is building/having their own CAM
> > tool.
> > Just to mention a few that comes into my mind: NativeCAM, PyCam,
> >
On 01.04.22 19:16, gene heskett wrote:
I'm getting sorta familiar with OpenSCAD, but I'm feeding a 3d printer
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openscad
available
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
On Friday, 1 April 2022 10:59:08 EDT Hans Unzner wrote:
> Regarding the CAM software:
> It feels for me a bit like everyone is building/having their own CAM
> tool. Just to mention a few that comes into my mind: NativeCAM, PyCam,
>
Le ven. 1 avr. 2022 à 18:01, Hans Unzner a écrit :
> At least for pycam there is already a comprehensive documentation:
> http://pycam.sourceforge.net/
>
> Am 01.04.22 um 17:04 schrieb Steffen Möller:
> >
> > On 01.04.22 16:59, Hans Unzner wrote:
> >> Regarding the CAM software:
> >> It feels
Ah, famous SebKuminsky is behind it on
https://github.com/SebKuzminsky/pycam/releases - that makes it two. I
just saw that someone Petter already sent in patches who is a Debian
Developer - @petter, I made the lighthearted promise to package CAM to
augment the CNC infrastructure of Debian. Can I
At least for pycam there is already a comprehensive documentation:
http://pycam.sourceforge.net/
Am 01.04.22 um 17:04 schrieb Steffen Möller:
On 01.04.22 16:59, Hans Unzner wrote:
Regarding the CAM software:
It feels for me a bit like everyone is building/having their own CAM
tool.
Just to
On 01.04.22 16:59, Hans Unzner wrote:
Regarding the CAM software:
It feels for me a bit like everyone is building/having their own CAM
tool.
Just to mention a few that comes into my mind: NativeCAM, PyCam,
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/31-cad-cam/45456-simple-linux-cam?start=0
I haven't worked
Regarding the CAM software:
It feels for me a bit like everyone is building/having their own CAM tool.
Just to mention a few that comes into my mind: NativeCAM, PyCam,
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/31-cad-cam/45456-simple-linux-cam?start=0
I haven't worked with them so I don't know the strengths
Steffan,
Thanks for the background and update.
Sometimes I think I must be the only one playing with Sid and the Debian
packages.
It's now quite dated. It's a bit frustrating that you have to then compile
Linuxcnc to get the latest updates but the vast majority of the
dependencies are already
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 09:00, Stefan Freisei Muehlbacher
wrote:
> there are already debian live images. Maybe it is worth to create a
> kickstart-script that converts a standard debian-live-iso to a linuxcnc
> live iso.
We have our own debian-live repository for creating the custom ISO
(with our
Hi again,
To me, the .iso is a show room, and that may be worthwhile to extend
beyond the core functionality of LinuxCNC. I am too fresh into this to
design this myself, read: I would benefit from such a compilation, too.
On https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/1691 Jérémie mentioned that
Rod,
On 01.04.22 10:06, Rod Webster wrote:
I can't wait until it gets to Bookworm. I keep checking
It is on me. What the Debian FTPmasters have checked was my initial
build. Now, upon acceptance and with every subsequent update, they want
just the source tarball reuploaded to autobuild
Le ven. 1 avr. 2022 à 10:01, Rod Webster a écrit :
> Jérémie, Phil,
>
> The RIP build process is clearly explained in the documentation including
> how to list the required dependencies,
> If you want a shortcut, I would follow this recipe:
> https://www.qtpyvcp.com/install/bullseye.html
Had
Steffan,
Thanks for that. Its very much appreciated.
The weekend has just begun and I don't have a suitable PC here at home. I
will retest as soon as I can.
I can't wait until it gets to Bookworm. I keep checking
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
On 01.04.22 02:48, gene heskett wrote:
On Thursday, 31 March 2022 20:23:46 EDT Rod Webster wrote:
I am not so sure about that, the ISO is useful to "try before you buy"
without committing to wiping the existing OS on the PC.
I wondered how relevant using an ISO to try before buy was with
Jérémie, Phil,
The RIP build process is clearly explained in the documentation including
how to list the required dependencies,
If you want a shortcut, I would follow this recipe:
https://www.qtpyvcp.com/install/bullseye.html
Note its not necessary to run linuxcnc as RIP if you compile the
Am 01.04.2022 um 08:41 schrieb Jérémie Tarot:
Le jeu. 31 mars 2022 à 23:31, andy pugh a écrit :
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 21:37, Rod Webster wrote:
This also should simplify the release as there will be no reason to waste
resources on building ISO's anymore.
eg. 2.8 should be the last ISO
Le jeu. 31 mars 2022 à 23:36, Feral Engineer a
écrit :
> I'd also like to just point out that all of your hard work and effort is
> currently getting channelled into the young minds at my local vo tech.
That's gold Phil! Having LinuxCNC brought to schools is priceless
once I figure out
Le ven. 1 avr. 2022 à 04:51, Rod Webster a écrit :
Why on earth do we try and restrict it to using a very narrow range of
> python versions?
> Surely Python 3.x is enough. Makes no sense to me.
>
That was clearly my first thoughts!
But then it seemed to me wrt to struggle of those in charge
Le jeu. 31 mars 2022 à 23:31, andy pugh a écrit :
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 21:37, Rod Webster wrote:
>
> > This also should simplify the release as there will be no reason to waste
> > resources on building ISO's anymore.
> > eg. 2.8 should be the last ISO released.
> >
>
> I am not so sure
The same happened to me when using Linux MInt where the python version was
< 3.9
Why on earth do we try and restrict it to using a very narrow range of
python versions?
Surely Python 3.x is enough. Makes no sense to me.
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
On Thursday, 31 March 2022 20:23:46 EDT Rod Webster wrote:
> >I am not so sure about that, the ISO is useful to "try before you buy"
> >without committing to wiping the existing OS on the PC.
>
> I wondered how relevant using an ISO to try before buy was with
> VirtuaBox and VMware Player
Well, I concede defeat on that.
I did also raise an issue about the broken package on unstable branch.
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 10:33, andy pugh wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 01:26, Rod Webster
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 01:26, Rod Webster wrote:
> I wondered how relevant using an ISO to try before buy was with VirtuaBox
> and VMware Player allowing virtual machines.
Fair point. But then that doesn't let you test the latency in a useful way.
You see those goalposts? I loaded them on a
>I am not so sure about that, the ISO is useful to "try before you buy"
>without committing to wiping the existing OS on the PC.
I wondered how relevant using an ISO to try before buy was with VirtuaBox
and VMware Player allowing virtual machines.
I thought I'd be smart and see how long it took to
I'd also like to just point out that all of your hard work and effort is
currently getting channelled into the young minds at my local vo tech. I've
taken on some retrofit projects with a bunch of students and we're using
LinuxCNC as the basis for all of the machines we're working on. There will
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 21:37, Rod Webster wrote:
> This also should simplify the release as there will be no reason to waste
> resources on building ISO's anymore.
> eg. 2.8 should be the last ISO released.
>
I am not so sure about that, the ISO is useful to "try before you buy"
without
> From: Feral Engineer
> Date: 2022-03-31 7:17 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Plan for 2.9 release
>
> I love cl and there is definitely a group of us who use it and would like
> to see it updated to the latest release. CL was the reason I s
suggesting we try to plan a bit better and maybe release more often.
Original message
From: Feral Engineer
Date: 2022-03-31 7:17 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Plan for 2.9 release
I love cl and there is definitely a group of us who use it and would
I love cl and there is definitely a group of us who use it and would like
to see it updated to the latest release. CL was the reason I started using
LinuxCNC. Ladder style plc is still widely relevant in commerical CNC
machines. Fanuc and Mitsubishi controls use it extensively.
Phil T.
The Feral
On Thursday, 31 March 2022 03:30:56 EDT andy pugh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 06:48, Chris Morley
wrote:
> > I disagree with an update to classicladder in 2.9 (assuming you wish
> > to release in less than 6 months)
> I haven't been paying full attention, but I was under the impression
>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 06:48, Chris Morley wrote:
> I disagree with an update to classicladder in 2.9 (assuming you wish to
> release in less than 6 months)
I haven't been paying full attention, but I was under the impression
that there were problems with the current CL that we ship, related
)
From: andy pugh
Sent: March 30, 2022 8:23 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Plan for 2.9 release
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 06:38, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> What things are not in master already that you think might want to be in 2.9?
I don't know, that is why I am trying to
These two boards will increase the popularity and cheap option for new
users.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 00:18 andy pugh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 06:38, Chris Morley
> wrote:
> >
> > What things are not in master already that you think might want to be in
> 2.9?
>
> I don't know, that is why
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 06:38, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> What things are not in master already that you think might want to be in 2.9?
I don't know, that is why I am trying to start a discussion.
Possibilities that I have thought of since starting to think about it
include the Remora and ColorCNC
.
officially setting a date early is an important step we tend to miss.
Chris
From: andy pugh
Sent: March 29, 2022 9:15 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: [Emc-developers] Plan for 2.9 release
What do we think needs to be in 2.9? And when should it be released?
I think
What do we think needs to be in 2.9? And when should it be released?
I think that the Python3 work might be reason enough. What is there
that isn't _quite_ right yet?
I am thinking that having the po4a documentation process working (but
not completed) would be nice. Then we can watch the online
45 matches
Mail list logo