Hello Peter and Gary:
We have found the CB Certificate and Test Report effective
for:
CE mark test report.
Eastern bloc countries, especially Poland, Czechia,
Slovakia, Hungary.
China (but requires factory inspection).
Korea.
Singapore.
Japan (when certificati
Hello Lisa,
98/37/EC is a re-issue of the original Machinery Directive (89/392/EEC)
along with all of its amendments to that re-issue. 98/37/EC can be found
in the EC's Official Journal (OJ, L 207, pages 1-46, dated 23 July 1998.
Regards, Art Michael, Editor - Int'l Product Safety News
Can someone confirm for me that the machinery Directive is now 98/37/EC?
..or is this an ammendment to the original?
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (with
Gary, Rich,
I have worked with hi-tech companies in Israel since 1987. Most do
not have CB Test Reports. Most get their UL/CUL, CE (Safety and
EMC). Quiet a few get TUV Rheinland Approvals. Many also obtain
telecom approvals in various countries and so far, the CE Reports
have been good enough
Massimo:
Further complicating the issue is that the Apollo 1 fire ocurred with a partial
pressure O2 rich environment. My guess(!) is that a >1ATM O2 rich environment
would be even more hazardous.
Maybe you can find some hints on this via NASA or a hyperbaric chamber
manufacturer?
Ed
--
I am looking for a equipment to test ESD and other related to EMC
"MANUFACTURED in JAPAN".
If you have some information please email me
We have the oportunity to by something with a Japan project,
but must be equipment from Japan,
all the equipment I know isnt from JP.
If you have an www adr
Try also:
CIR Enterprises
1320 Factory Circle
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
Phone: (303) 857-6196
Fax: (303) 857-6204
Owner: Tony Ciriaco Sr.
-Original Message-
From: CTL [mailto:c...@prodigy.net]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 1998 7:25 AM
To: Steve Kuiper; EMC-PSTC
Subject: Re: 10m Indoor OATS Face
Hi Chaz,
Yes, that is allowed as part of the new (10/1/97) FCC rules using the
DoC procedure - check Part 15 Sec 15.102 (interesting reading). That
label certainly generated questions in our group when we first saw it.
A related question is what about incorporating one of these PCs INTO a
product
>Hello all.
>
>I have a question on that centers on the new FCC Class B
>certification procedures.
>
>My company has recently bought a bunch of PCs for use
>as emulators during emissions testing. I happened to
>notice that while ALL of the PCs had the FCC Class B
>logo on their label, some of the
Could some of the more experienced member of this forum share
there views and or experiences on the usefulness of current probes
in carry out pre-compliance RF immunity testing.
I am aware that there are limitation to this method of current
injection to simulate true RF field immunity condit
Hello Massimo,
The use of devices in oxygen enriched environments is not a trivial question.
Many materials that are fire retardant at 21% O2 are highly combustible in
enriched environments.If your product has not been specifically designed
and evaluated for use in such environments, one w
The key word below is "allow." There is no requirement that one NCB accept
the report of another NCB. I am aware of one case where a CB Scheme Test
Report from one NCB was refused out of hand by another NCB in the same
country (both shall remain nameless), without any rational qualification.
I
Hello all.
I have a question on that centers on the new FCC Class B
certification procedures.
My company has recently bought a bunch of PCs for use
as emulators during emissions testing. I happened to
notice that while ALL of the PCs had the FCC Class B
logo on their label, some of the PCs also
I believe that it is the ENEC Mark of the VDE (ENEC-Zeichen des VDE) for
products conforming to harmonized certification procedures; VDE mark is
optional.
Thank you
Charles Grasso
StorageTek
2270 Sth 88th Street
Louisville CO 80027 MS 4262
gra...@louisville.stortek.com
Tel:(303)673-2908
Fax(303)66
Hi Chris,
1. In this scenario where we only ship software and part of the
hardware what are our regulatory responsibilities vs. those of the
distributor?
Answer: Based on the Medical Device Directive, Article 1, paragraph 2.(a),
software is included in the definition of a "medical devic
For EMC/Safety requirements in New Zealand, contact:
Brian Emmett
Technical Officer (Regulatory)
Radio Spectrum Management
Ministry of Commerce
Unit B, 52 Mandeville Street
PO Box 8562
Christchurch
NEW ZEALAND
Phone +64-3-343-1240
Fax +64-3-343-1219
e-mail:brian.emm...@moc.govt.nz
Interne
Hello Peter,
ENEC now has a website of their own. Just visit the Safety Link
and select the acronym, ENEC, in the Product Safety subsection.
Regards, Art Michael
Int'l Product Safety News
A.E. Michael, Editor
P.O. Box 1561 LS
Middletown CT 06457-8061 U.S.A.
Phone : (860) 344-1651
Fax
Hi Everybody
Can anyone out there point me in the direction of
a standard or code of practice for the marking of removable
interconnecting cables.
I am particularly interested in forms of marking and durability of
labels.
Many Thanks
Brian Harlowe
* opinions expressed he
I found the following sites with ENEC information
www.semko.se/info/enec.htm
www.demko.de/english/new%20documents/enec.htm
Good Luck
Ian Ball
Dedicated Micros
Manchester
UK
--
From: Peter Merguerian[SMTP:pe...@itl.co.il]
Sent: 23 November 1998 21:00
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Richard,
Unfortunately the answer is no, the DOC is different amongst other things. I
suggest you visit http://www.aca.gov.au there is more information there on EMC
legislation than you can shake a stick at. I also have copies of the MRA guide
for European companies doing business in Australia
A distributors of ours asks us about the suitability of our ECG device for
use into a Hyperbaric Chamber.
Does anybody know any reference safety standard for medical devices in
hyperbaric chamber?
Are the environmental conditions similar to those in presence of a
"flammable anaesthetic mixture
Hi Chris.
Heres a twopence worth.
You asked:
Whoever places the stuff 'on the market' in the EEA must take
responsibility for CE marking. Software doesn't have any directives to
follow, but it's packaging does. Mustn't be poisonous, have sharp edges,
give off gas etc. etc. Any hardware mu
PSNet & Rich,
I like Rich's summary of the problem... In my work, I am
continuing to ask (harass) the LED manufacturers for data showing that the
their LED's do not fall into the laser mode under normal or expected fault
conditions... I know that they can't define all the fault condition
At 09:25 AM 11/23/98 -0500, "CTL" wrote:
>Check out Panashield, Inc.
Panashield is a chamber vendor, one of the many. As all chamber vendors,
they're in the business of selling their shielding and absorber materials.
Their efforts to help a customer solve his/her testing problem are
motivated by
Hello everyone,
I have been lurking for a long time and this will be my
first post to the group.
I have a question for the group on the effect on
regulatory requirements of product assembly and distribution strategy.
Here's my situa
Hi Glyn:
Two comments:
1) In a power cord, two conductors must be identified, one
being the protective earthing conductor, the other being
the neutral conductor (assuming a polarized connection
to the supply).
Here are the required identification colors according to
Eur
26 matches
Mail list logo