Moshe,
Here is a third and final thread message from 1 ½ years ago.
Jim Knighten
NCR
rehel...@mmm.com mailto:rehel...@mmm.com wrote:
I have been trying to educate our management on EMC. I am
interested in the
source(s) of your statement:
Some EU
Moshe,
Here is another thread from 1 ½ years ago.
Jim Knighten
NCR
--
Dear Richard
The Self-Declaration Route to Conformity under the EU's EMC Directive
requires the manufacturer to create and sign a Declaration of Conformity
which
Moshe,
I forward a message from a thread a year and a half ago.
Jim Knighten
NCR Corp.
-
Jim,
See below. You should also check www.rcic.com http://www.rcic.com , the
archive for this group. for more of
Daniel PSNet,
IEC 950 - now IEC 60950 - is an international standard, meaning
that all countries participating in the development of the standard bring
their codes and practices to the table and some subset of the same is
included in the final standard.
EN 60950 is the
Moshe,
I heard that an engineering manager is the one likely to go to jail!
Might be some time for us to change titles!
Peter
Hello everyone,
I need some horror stories on enforcement in Europe (to help convince some
managers we
really have to comply).
Anything new in this area?
Posted on behalf of Bobbie Cronquist, John Wright, and
Julie Gaevert.
Some sad news about Joe Wujak, whom many of you may know and remember.
Bobbie Cronquist
- Forwarded message --
I have the very unfortunate task of telling everyone that Joe Wujek
and
Regarding conducted limits in Bellcore 1089 (part of the NEBS required for
co-located telco equipment) they start at 10 kHz.
John A. Juhasz
Product Qualification
Compliance Engr.
Fiber Options, Inc.
80 Orville Dr. Suite 102
Bohemia, NY 11716 USA
Tel: 516-567-8320 ext. 324
Fax: 516-567-8322
Dear safety experts,
I thought that HAR designated cable used for 230V power cords will be in
accordance with other safety standards (EN60950 electric strength for reinforced
or double insulation).
Cordage carrying the same code name (H05VV-F) is rated for the same working
voltage (300/500V) but
Hi Listmembers:
The silly season sweeps through Finland, and my friend Constance, sends me some
new standards info.
USEFUL METRIC CONVERSIONS
1 million microphones = 1 megaphone
2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds
10 cards = 1 decacards
1/2 lavatory = 1 demijohn
1
HI!
There is no change for EMS enforcement date (Jan. 2000) in Korea yet.
Applicant for EMI approval could be local company, however, Canada located
company
could be applicant too since Korea and Canada made MRA. And, also, EMI label
has to be affixed onto the product as you said. All ITE
If it were that simple, so would be the codes.
You asked a lot of questions without reducing the scope. Answers depend
on the application.
For example ampacity depends on temperature which in turn depends on
environment (ambient, buried, aerial, in conduit, in concrete, or other
dissipation
At 7:49 AM +0200 7/20/99, fven...@alcatel.altech.co.za wrote:
My question relates to the limit lines in CISPR 22/EN 55022. Would you
say that it is valid to apply the limits in the standard to a conducted
emission test on a dc line.
EN55022 line conducted testing is based on the interference
Doug,
Here are two execellent labs that can do the European tests for you:
Professional Testing
Contact: Jeff Lenk or David Ball
1303 W. Industrial Blvd.
Round Rock, Tx. 78681 (Austin)
512-244-3371
or
Southwest Research
Contact: David A. Smith or Jim Polonis
6220 Culebra Rd.
San Antonio,
Other than for potential weasling (yes a very imprecise American term) their
should be no confusion. Here are the definitions from Merriam Webster's
Thesaurus, a reasonably astute source.
Gary
P.S. There are two other definitions of must be they didn't shed any light
on the meanings being
Hello All,
I'm curently looking into requiremetns for Japan (both EMC Safety). I guess
it's VCCI for the EMC and IEC specs. for safety (presuming Japan are part of
the CB scheme?). The product in question will be a dimmer for use in theatre/TV
studios (large rack type 70+ ways, not the small
Hi group,
Current applicable requirement is EMI only. Testing must be done by a
recognise test labs and applicant to RRL for EMI approval must be a local
company. Upon approval, a Korea EMI label with EMI( A or B) indicated, has
to be affixed onto the product.
According to my backdated
Peter,
Both IEC 60950 and UL 1950 include section 6 which details additional
requirements for
telecom equipment. The earlier parts of these standards also apply, including
the 10N
force tests.
If the 10N force test makes sense for typical working voltages of 120V or 230V,
it certainly
makes
If the test is failing due to reduced spacings would that not already be
considered non compliant by Clause 2.9? If this is not the case, applying
the force prior to the overvoltage test may be considered a double fault
condition.
Best Regards,
Jody Leber
jle...@ustech-lab.com
While that may or may not be true, you will find the use of shall to be the
predominant term as compared to must when it comes to US law. As a former
local government official responsible for writing local ordinances and for
implementing or enforcing state law, I found the term shall to be
Thank you to all who commented on my French Customs problem. Clearly
the expedient solution is to supply a copy of the Declaration of Conformity
with each shipment to France, and we will do this.
I am also asking the authorities how the French are able to do this!
In answer to one question, the
Hi All
Due to local demand for the test, we have started to conduct conducted
emission tests on dc supply lines to the equipment. The reason why it
is demanded is that in a telecoms centre one does not have the equipment
connected to a dc battery. It is most of the time connected in parallel
Vitaly,
Actually it is the other way around. As a former bureaucrat, must
is definitely clearer. In the US government, when something is mandatory,
the term is WILL as in:
the distance will be at least three meters etc. (SEE MIL STD 461)
One of the reasons that that the
Hi Peter:
There are two schools of thought:
1) Clearance is an independent, stand-alone criterion.
2) Clearance determines electric strength of air and is
an alternate means for determining the electric
strength of air.
If you are in the first school, then there is no reason
23 matches
Mail list logo