Good Afternoon,
I just talked to the gentleman below yesterday.
John Parnell jparn...@schaffner.com
Regards,
Michael Stone
L. S. Compliance, Inc.
W66 N220 Commerce Court
Cedarburg, WI 53012
mst...@lsr.com
V 262-375-4400 Ext. 128
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks to all who responded to my question about broadband radiation from ac
induction motors.
--
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: broadband RE from AC induction motors
Date: Mon, Jan 28, 2002, 2:52 PM
I read in !emc-pstc that
The need for snubbers on the relays?
I dealt with a product which used a 1 1/2 HP motor
with arcing visible to the operator and did have any
high end emissions. 600 MHz is rather high for a
motor. Even 30 MHz. Would have thought problems
showing up in the conducted side of things instead.
Hi friends,
Can anybody inform which are the power supply cords required to be used in
household appliances sold in Saudi Arabia?
I know that British fused plugs are used there (for 220V/60Hz), but I want
to know if this is a regulatory requirement.
BTW, class OI or class II appliances are
I read in !emc-pstc that Patrick Lawler plaw...@west.net wrote (in
jk9g5ugvng02meh8ftttd7aebojbvfs...@4ax.com) about 'Is there an
immunity spec complement to the EN61000-3-3 flicker emissions spec?', on
Wed, 30 Jan 2002:
In a recent posting, someone commented on the possiblity of 'flicker'
I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com wrote (in
67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB601767759@BCMAIL1) about 'SV: Generic
emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Wed, 30 Jan 2002:
If you are using the standards route to compliance, what determines which
standards you MUST use? Are we
Greetings,
We evaluate our equipment to UL 3101-1, CSA 1010.0 and EN 61010-1. Our
existing variable autotransformer adds up to 1mA of leakage current when
performing the Current Test section of the Permissible Limits
requirements(Sec. 6.3.2.2 allowing 3.5mA in single fault condition).
I have
Does anyone have a phone number or web address for information concerning
Wandel Goldermann field intensity probes? I noticed that they supply to
Schaffener-Chase, but have not been able to find any reps or info.
Thanks in advance,
Susan Beard
---
My question should have been stated more clearly - my apologies.
If you are using the standards route to compliance, what determines which
standards you MUST use? Are we obligated to apply all applicable EN's that
are published, regardless of whether or not they have appeared in the OJ, or
are
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F13D0F@flbocexu05) about 'EEC compliance for a
ground based radar', on Wed, 30 Jan 2002:
Hold on a second. Why is it considered ISM and not RTTE? Seems to me that it
is subject to the RTTE Directive in
Hi folks,
I need to do a study about the concern and normative of each country in
Europe about the effects of magnetic fields on human health.
Could someone give me some information about this issue, or any web page
where i can get that information.
Thanks in advance and best regards
Jose Rio
In a recent posting, someone commented on the possiblity of 'flicker' emissions
(controlled by EN61000-3-3) causing a disturbance in 'victim' equipment.
Would EN61000-4-11 (Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations) be
an immunity spec complement to EN61000-3-3? Or is EN61000-4-14
Cecil,
ITE does require certification in Korea, and certified equipment must be
labeled with the MIC mark and some accompanying information about the
certification. But regulations do not mandate a location for the label or
marking. The label must be permanently affixed and easily seen. For
I have a couple of questions regarding this standard: (I have the 1992
version)
First
Table 16 specifies maximum temperature RISE for components, surfaces,...
What are the assumptions here? Are they assuming an ambient of room
temperature (25 deg C)? Which would mean that a rubber handle
To All,
Does the Korean EMC requirements specify EMC any marking on the
product dataplate or label?
Cecil
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at:
Rich:
I imagine that a good lawyer could argue that the radar is ISM, as it uses
the emitted energy to profile the properties of a material, to wit, the
Earth's atmosphere and those random discontinuities (like ships) that are
distributed throughout the material. Although a valid point of view,
The Curtis-Straus Update is for Jamuary, 2002 is now available at:
http://www.conformity-update.com
The headlines are:
Static Charge May Have Minimized Anthrax Spread.
FCC Eases Rules For Fixed Point-to-Point Transmitters.
FCC Releases New Filing Addresses And Fax Number.
EU Approves Mobile
Hold on a second. Why is it considered ISM and not RTTE? Seems to me that it
is subject to the RTTE Directive in that it uses the spectrum for
communications with a transponder - active or passive as the case may be.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
-Original
Tania
Just had an undeliverable from your email address. If you pick this up via
the pstc group see below and go to
http://www.europa.eu.int/geninfo/query_en.htm
search on string use of cadmium and the pdf should come up as the first
result.
Or try going to the doc direct via:
I seem to recollect that I have previously pointed out
that the LVD states electrical equipment which complies
withharmonised standards shall be regardedas complying;
and standards shall be regarded as harmonized once they are
drawn up by common agreementand published under national
Hi Folks
To answer Jim's point:
LVD Annex IV Internal Production Control states:
1) Internal production control is the procedure whereby the manufacturer or
his authorized representative established within the Community, who carries
out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures and
Mike,
For Australia, some of the standards you may wish to check include:
Safety - AS/NZS 3200.X.X suite of standards (Approval and Test
Specifications - Medical electrical equipment). These are based on the IEC
601-X-X suite of standards.
EMC - AS/NZS 2064 (equivalent to CISPR 11 and
Ken, I don't recall your original query but it sounds like you were asking
about BCI testing requirements. I can answer for medical equipment. The
2nd ED of 60601-1-2 requires BCI testing of all patient connected cables.
Best regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From:
Sir
This serial bus is not intended to be used external to a PWB. The II
means inter-IC. Noise/EFT immunity for I2C I/O external to the PWB is
problematic. Noise/EFT immunity for I2C external to an unit's chassis is,
well, even more problematic...
I am not aware of any CPU-based I2C or chipset
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:45 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: EU Packaging Query
I read in !emc-pstc that OSBORN,DAVE (A-hsgAndover,ex1)
dosb...@hsgmed.com wrote (in
25 matches
Mail list logo
