Re: Immunity Standards

I read in !emc-pstc that cecil.gitt...@kodak.com wrote (in OFE4B08CCA.7 e649265-on85256b58.004e1...@kodak.com) about 'Immunity Standards', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Have you? How much do we have to pay to be

Re: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

I read in !emc-pstc that geor...@lexmark.com wrote (in 200202061341.IAA 00...@interlock2.lexmark.com) about 'Compliance After Repairs in the Field', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: Our products range in price from $50 to $10K. The low end units have no service plan, only dispose and replace. All of the

Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3

I read in !emc-pstc that cherryclo...@aol.com wrote (in 3f.61cee6f.29928...@aol.com) about 'SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: My intention was simply to remind people (if any reminding was needed) that achieving a presumption of conformity does not necessarily

Immunity Standards

Hi group, I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Regards Cecil --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site

AC Flyback Transformer

Hi everyone, I'm trying to locate a source or sources for a very low profile flyback transformer. The ideal part would be: 1. As small as possible 2. A turns ratio of approx 177 - 7 3. A secondary rated for 200mA 4. A primary rated for 20mA 5. Double Insulation between primary and

Compliance After Repairs in the Field

Allen, I agree with your comments. Hi-pot is not, and never was, a reliable safe/unsafe test. It merely finds component and/or finished goods whose processes may have crept to non-compliance. For example, xfmrs whose internal creepage/clearance distances between windings have crept over

Re: SV: Generic emissions - EN 61000-6-3

Dear John My intention was simply to remind people (if any reminding was needed) that achieving a presumption of conformity does not necessarily mean complying with the EMC Directive. Regards, Keith Armstrong www.cherryclough.com In a message dated 05/02/02 22:57:37 GMT Standard Time,

RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

Hi Folks The concept of hipotting equipment in the field after repairs may theoretically be a good one - but is fraught with both practical and safety problems. For example: a) Some equipment needs special hipot equipment or equipment settings, e.g. if it has large filter capacitors on the

Re: Waiting for the new server

I read in !emc-pstc that Wallace Zhong walla...@dominion.net.au wrote (in 77451ffea072d511b417ab913930037...@mamabear.domelectron.com.au ) about 'Waiting for the new server', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: The following message has been included in each E-mail for months. When will the exciting new

Re: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

I read in !emc-pstc that marti...@appliedbiosystems.com wrote (in of6ced213d.bf9618d9-on88256b57.00806...@pe-c.com) about 'Compliance After Repairs in the Field', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002: We are a manufacturer of Laboratory Equipment. We evaluate our products to UL 3101-1, CSA 1010.0 and EN 61010.

Re: Voluntary EN standards

Mr. Koh 1) Speaker alone with built-in amplifer is classifed as associated euipment. If there is no antenna connector, it is not necessary to do the immunity test. 2) Harmonic and Flicker are mandatory since 2001-01-01 3) In your DOC, you still have to mention those mandatory standards.

RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

If products required to have 100% production-line tests (such as Hi-pot and Ground Continuity tests), then I required that tests should be made in the field after repairs. I think it at least benefits checking out the minimum safety constructions are still functioning well. Regards, Anderson

Waiting for the new server

Hello group, The following message has been included in each E-mail for months. When will the exciting new server be online? All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the

Compliance After Repairs in the Field

Greetings, We are a manufacturer of Laboratory Equipment. We evaluate our products to UL 3101-1, CSA 1010.0 and EN 61010. When we repair a product in the field, which may include replacing power supplies, line filters, etc., what obligations do we have to verify continuing compliance with the

Re: ITE Class A vs B Emissions

I read in !emc-pstc that Charles Grasso chasgra...@hotmail.com wrote (in f109fkprctci90gp8yj0...@hotmail.com) about 'ITE Class A vs B Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002: Has the CE+CE=CE idea been adopted? Absolutely not in general, only for electrical switchboards, AIUI. -- Regards, John