My company is looking for a test lab that can conduct contactor make-break
tests at 2000 vdc, 1400 amps preferably in North America.
Anyone know of one?
Thanks for your help.
Don Sladek
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website:
On 11/28/2006, Steve Thomas wrote:
Just reviewing EN 60950:2006 table 2N….
Am I right in thinking that the creepage distances for non-coated PCB’s has
been relaxed?
Ie Reinforced creepage distance is now 2mm for a working voltage of 250V,
material group IIIa? Whereas before it was 5mm (ref
Hi Charles and the Group,
I think you found it faster than me! I did an archeological dig today
to find it.
The patent, 4,751,607 dated June 14, 1988, was titled Communication
Line Transient Protection. Despite the title it has nothing to do
with classical device protection but data signal
Hello,
If one I.T. equipment is tested and have a report of EN60950-1, is the EN41003
report required for this equipment at same time? or, EN60950-1 is enough ?
why the standard EN60950-1 and EN41003 is on the LVD harmonized standards list
at same time?
Best regards,
Zhang Guoqing
We have been looking at equipment from Agilent that can run these radar
simulations although the other big test equipment manufacturers all have
similar product offerings. Your best bet is to get a hold of your friendly
neighbourhood Agilent rep. Make sure you are sitting down when they tell you
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:26:28 +0530,
kbalasubraman...@scmmicro.co.in wrote:
For EU trash bin symbol mandatory for WEEE. Is there any logo
specified for Japan? Is same trash bin logo applicable for Japan? Without
any logo for WEEE can we ship to Japan.
The EU trash bin symbol is not
FCC Part 15 contains the basic rules to apply for Verification
devices/systems. The test procedures to be followed are contained in
ANSI C63.4: 2003, and contain drawings and instructions for setup and
testing of the EUT, including systems. In fact, ANSI C63 defines an EUT
as a device or system...
Hello Don,
There is an IATA 902 requirement and a outdated CFR49 requirement. CFR49
removed the requirement about 1984.
What are you referencing?
Regards,
Ken
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of UMBDENSTOCK,
DON
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:59 PM
To:
A magnetic product within certain field strength bounds requires a packaging
label indicating contents to be magnetic. I have found a reference that
indicates an additional air eligible labeling requirement, and another
that indicates this is not required. Anyone familiar with labeling
The US Patent number is 4751607.
Its still there Doug!!
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications Corp.
Tel: 303-706-5467
Fax: 303-799-6222
Cell: 303-204-2974
Pager/Short Message: 3032042...@vtext.com
Email: charles.gra...@echostar.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Kris,
Normally the extra pairs are not needed. I have some jumpers that have
two pairs and I like the smaller size. Gigabit Ethernet uses all four
pairs though.
Over 15 years ago, in the late 80s when Cat5 cable was new and
dinosaurs roamed the earth, part of my funding at Bell Labs was
At 12/13/2006, Zhang Guoqing wrote:
If one I.T. equipment is tested and have a report of EN60950-1, is the EN41003
report required for this equipment at same time? or, EN60950-1 is enough ?
why the standard EN60950-1 and EN41003 is on the LVD harmonized standards list
at same time?
Hi
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:35:58 -,
Brian Jones e...@brianjones.co.uk wrote:
The purpose of Annex ZA in parallel-voted CENELEC standards is to control
the way in which referenced documents are applied.
...
For EMC standards in Europe, dated references are preferred. Standards are
produced
Hi Jeff
Additionally EN 954-1 is superseded by EN ISO 13849-1:2006-11 (dow: 2009).
Please note also that the old Machinery Directive 98/37/EC is superseded by
2006/42/EC with a specific clause of excluded low voltage equipment in
article 1 clause (2) number k). Other equipment which fulfills
Kris,
2 pairs are used for 10TX and 100TX Ethernet. One pair is used for transmit,
the other one for receive.
You need 4 pairs for 1000TX Ethernet. All four pairs are used in both
directions.
Charles Spurgeon has a nice website about Ethernet including some historical
tidbits:
Hi All, hi Grace,
where can I buy Chinese standards e. g. GB 18455 as PDF file in English?
Thanks in advance.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Yours sincerely
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Loerzer
Managing Director
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Chairman of the Product Conformity Group (DIN ANP German Committee
Dear All,
For EU trash bin symbol mandatory for WEEE. Is there any logo
specified for Japan? Is same trash bin logo applicable for Japan? Without
any logo for WEEE can we ship to Japan.
Sincerely
K.Balasubramanian
Project Leader - Hardware.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Hello,
Does anyone know why an Ethernet cable has 4 pairs where only 2 pairs are
used: 1 for TX, 1 for RX.
Is it possible to use ethernet cables with just 2 pairs and not have
performance or other issues?
Best regards,
Kris Carpentier
Regulatory Approvals
Group,
Does anyone know if relay outputs that are not fused are subject to an over
current test such as in EN61010?
16A during one hour. If we didn’t specify the value for an external fuse,
they should assume a std. 16A fuse for over current.
Does this test apply to the EN60730? If the
Hello EMC Group
We are looking for a radar simulator generator per Annex D of EN 301 893
V1.3.1.
Any help concerning suitable equipment will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Shaike Raz
EMC Laboratory Manager
EMC Laboratory
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
Kfar Bin Nun
Israel
Tel:
Hi all,
I'm looking for articles about RF coupling between cables. It should contain
basic equations and also how to classify good cables with respect to
prevent coupling.
This case came up when we had an installation and cables were running on 500
meters cable trays. Unintended coupling and
21 matches
Mail list logo
