Test Engineering Position at Eaton Corporation, Milwaukee WI

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Eaton Corporation located in Milwaukee, WI has an opening for a Test Engineer. This position will perform test engineering process development, problem resolution and transfer activities associated with new product growth programs within the Standard Package & Controls Business Unit. Products incl

FCC Part 15 and U.S. Safety dates?

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
hELLO, Does anyone know when the FCC rules (part 15) went into effect (1982)? Also, was there a date that a U.S. safety law WAS enacted and by who (OSHA)? Thanks,, Dave Lohbeck _ Check out

Re: Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message , dated Wed, 10 Oct 2007, gmccl...@lexmark.com writes: >Of specific concern are the harmonic and flicker current requirements. >The limits can be scaled 230/115 to utilize the standard but since the >US and Canada have never adopted them it is not a common test on a >110-127 V prod

Re: China RoHS Requirements

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear List Members, Once you complete the Declaration Table, documentation and labeling requirements for China RoHS, do you need to submit this to the China MII for approval? Is there any entity in the Chinese government that needs to review or approve the documentation before we ship our product

RE: CE certification and D of C

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Thanks Ron, Yes, It‘s been a while. I fully understand the CE view of EMC compliance. It is my management who does not understand it. We would like to CE mark this product but for the interface which is compliant. Thanks, Sudhakar _ From: Ron Pickard, RPQ [mailto:r

RE: CE certification and D of C

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Sudhakar, It’s been a while. Legalistically speaking, if that product fails the ESD testing from EN55024, then it fails to comply with the essential requirements of the EMC directive. It should not matter what interfaces are integrated into it. If either/both ports are exposed, it’s reas

RE: CE certification and D of C

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi Guys, We make SD+ product. One side is SD interface and other is USB. This device when used as USB drive which leaves SD pads open, fails ESD test per IEC61000-4-2. The failure is in SD side i.e. SD interface does not work after this test. Can we CE certify this product as SD

Requirements for Captial Equipment into Japan?

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
What are the requirements for shipping electron beam equipment [Semiconductor Capital equipment] to Japan? Does the installation/operation come under the heading of Industrial equipment and must be able to take 3V/m, or 10V/m, or is higher now? Is there a succinct table/list somewhere? Robert

Re: Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
John, Thank you for the reply. Of specific concern are the harmonic and flicker current requirements. The limits can be scaled 230/115 to utilize the standard but since the US and Canada have never adopted them it is not a common test on a 110-127 V product except in special cases. Therefore ther

RE: Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Brian, Thanks, this particular product is not a switchable or universal design. We have some products that we did exactly what you describe. The two versions use dedicated power supply designs so the power rating labels are specific for the 110-127 V and 220 - 240 V ranges. I believe the solutio

RE: Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Perhaps this can be 'confined' to just a marking issue. Had a similar requirement from a customer. Designed the label such that there were two distinct sections of logos and ratings. The 230V input ratings were segregated from the 120V input ratings, with the CE mark was only in the section with t

Re: Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message , dated Wed, 10 Oct 2007, gmccl...@lexmark.com writes: >The application of some of the harmonized standards that are written >specifically for 230V products makes it a bit more difficult to apply >them to a 115V model, Which ones? You should not need to do it. > >I have to believe

Question on distribution of non-EU equipment from within EU

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Ladies and Gentlemen We have a customer located in the EU that wishes to bundle one of our printer products with a system, including a PC and other equipment, and distribute it worldwide. Things work smoothly when they are configuring the system for another 230V country, inside or outside the EU.

Re: AW: FCC Part 15 and electrical equipment of machinery

2007-10-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Michael, your conclusions below are not true. Conclusions (in my understanding and review of the "overall discussions" in the past in the PSES community): FCC p. 15 is mandatory more for IT equipment not "industrial products" (?1) is also mandatory for transmitters Is that true?