Requirements for Power On/OFF Switch...US and EU Europe

2008-07-21 Thread Christine Rodham
Hi List Members, We purchased a networking product that will reside in the Customer Premise ( CPE) environment. ( FCC class A in the US ) We noticed that the unit DOES NOT have a power switch or a mains disconnect. In order to turn the unit off you have to pull out the plug from the unit or

Re: Requirements for Power On/OFF Switch...US and EU Europe

2008-07-21 Thread Ted Eckert
Generally, the plug can serve as the disconnect. Your instructions must state that the plug is the disconnect, and you must also state that the equipment shall be plugged into an outlet that is easily accessible and near the equipment. Take a look at IEC/UL 60950-1 sections 1.7.2 and 3.4.9 for

RE: Requirements for Power On/OFF Switch...US and EU Europe

2008-07-21 Thread Bolintineanu, Constantin
With the assumption that the subject equipment falls under the 60950 series of Standards, then the following types of disconnect devices are permitted: - the plug on the power supply cord; - a mains plug that is part of DIRECT PLUG-IN EQUIPMENT; - an appliance coupler; - isolating switches; -

RE: Requirements for Power On/OFF Switch...US and EU Europe

2008-07-21 Thread Carpentier Kristiaan
Apart from Safety, there is the European EuP Directive. For products within the scope of the EuP and its Implementing Measures on Off mode and Standby, providing a power switch might be the only possible solution for most products to comply with Tier 1, exp. to become mandatory end of 2009. Best

Re: THERMOCOUPLE WELDER

2008-07-21 Thread Nick Williams
It never occurred to me that someone might make a special gadget for this job - I just use our workshop oxy-acetylene torch! Nick. At 15:04 -0400 18/7/08, Bolintineanu, Constantin wrote: Dear Colleagues, I would like to kindly ask you in regard to the THERMOCOUPLES WELDERS that you are

IEC 62368

2008-07-21 Thread Brian O'Connell
questions questions questions 1. What is the status of IEC62368 and the associated and infamous IEC62441 ? Ultimately, when are 60950-1 and 60065 projected to be replaced by 62368 ? 2. As there have been several industry groups that have stated that an 8 year transition period is not

Re: IEC 62368

2008-07-21 Thread John Woodgate
In message 000f01c8eb75$d8adf800$d600a...@tamuracorp.com, dated Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Brian O'Connell oconne...@tamuracorp.com writes: 1. What is the status of IEC62368 and the associated and infamous IEC62441 ? Highly controversial. There are strong pressures on national committees to approve

RE: IEC 62368

2008-07-21 Thread 'Rich Nute'
Hi Brian: 1. What is the status of IEC62368 and the associated and infamous IEC62441 ? Ultimately, when are 60950-1 and 60065 projected to be replaced by 62368 ? CDV2 will be issued to National Committees for voting this or next month. (You can get a copy from your National

RE: IEC 62368

2008-07-21 Thread Brian O'Connell
Thanks much Rich. To further confuse item #2, please note public comments like this http://www.aeanet.org/Forums/uyjJDbXivUHVMhpKNeoAnHywYlFRFqkhSNGo SorUkafgtnTUQJRYEmBHxALldqWTyXItM.pdf (sorry about the wrap) Also, I have noted that many EU states have 'parallel' committees for both the IEC