In message 51e75653.6030...@radiusnorth.net, dated Wed, 17 Jul 2013,
Scott Douglas sdoug...@radiusnorth.net writes:
Reading the sentence above the operative terms are generates AND uses.
And, because of the AND, since we do not generate then it makes no
difference if we use the signals. My
In load side power distribution industrial/commercial electrical
sub-metering applications (feeder and branch circuits)we use
IEC/EN/UL61010-1 3rd (plus 61010-2-030 for the current transformers (CT)) to
evaluate our meter's safety design. In this application the instrument
current transformer
In message 4DA8FE10C88F443E988CA5E66A960CE9@christopher, dated Thu, 18
Jul 2013, Chris Wells radioactive55...@comcast.net writes:
what standard would be best to use to validate/control the CT
production as a separate independent component?
There is an IEC standard specifically for current
As of July 3 there is are new mandatory approvals requiring in-country
safety testing. Has there been any extension of this date?
Could anyone share their experience getting India approvals under this
new scheme?
Thanks,
David
David Gelfand
Compliance Specialist
Kontron Canada Inc
-
As I’ve always interpreted that sentence both John and Scott are correct, sort
of. Scott is correct in the translation of the sentence. John is correct in the
ramification. But since a device has no requirements it can’t technically fail
the requirements. The common terminology on contracts for
David,
No, there is not extension. There is a 90 day extension available for
companies who have their products submitted for testing prior to the deadline,
but who have not yet received a test report. You must apply for this extension.
Jim
__
James L. Knighten,
Photovoltaic inverters and related equipment.
Poor service and lousy communications are leading me to consider a move.
Any input will be accepted.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and/or privileged
Peter,
For global PV-related stuff, my best experiences have been with TUV
Rheinland. CSA could also be a choice, but am not certain if they have any
formal relationship with SII as TUVR does.
Regulatory for Southwest Asia, in general, is analogous to a combination of
Monty Python Flying Circus
The latest information for India registration and extension can be found at the
following sites:
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS): http://www.bis.org.in/other/ITCompReg.htm
Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY), scroll down the
page to the Standards section:
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001, First
Edition
I have a small sale - not large enough to generate the approval fees to 2nd
edition and latest amendments. But if the date of cessation et al - hasn't
passed we could continue with the sale.
My first answer was
*From:* McInturff, Gary [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2013 16:23
Anybody know the Docopocoss (or whatever on that) on IEC 60950-1:2001,
First Edition
Gary –
*EN** *60950-1:2001 lost favor on 1DEC2010.
You owe John Woodgate a nickel.
Peter Tarver
Assume that this is for the EU/EFTA.
CB report to 1st ed can be used a basis for presumption of conformity and
application of CE mark if you do a Tech File that would indicate additional
test data and/or rationale and/or construction data that indicates why all
of the new stuff up to the 2d ed
Colleagues,
Recently I had a conversation with a German colleague who told me that 'star
washers', commonly used for making vibration resistant bonding connections in
North America, are not permitted for this use in Germany. Only lock washers
meeting DIN 6796, commonly called 'Belleville'
To my knowledge, IEC-based standards do not specify this. If there is a requirement, possibly a local governing entity has required this. Sometimes the national code of a EU member country imposes additional requirements.
14 matches
Mail list logo
