Unfortunately, compliance to the NEC is only required if the local or state
government adopts it. Even then, they are not required to adopt any
specific edition of the NEC. There are communities that are still using
older editions as their current code. Some states have their own electrical
YES, FOR THE CONSUMER MARKET, THIS IS LIKE THE UNLISTED CHRISTMAS TREE
LIGHTS INVASION EACH YEAR.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Schanker [mailto:schan...@frontiernet.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Nikolassy, Anton; wo...@sensormatic.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
This is a very interesting conversation. Basically you are saying that this
is America. Your allowed to be as liable as you want to be.
Tony Nikolassy
FMRC
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Schanker [mailto:schan...@frontiernet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:38 PM
To:
You might try PTB in Braunschweig Germany. I have witnesses them testing
radar guns on the road in front of their laboratory.
Tony
Anton (Tony) Nikolassy
Project Engineer
Factory Mutual Research
Ph: 781-255-4819
Fx: 781-762-9375
Email: anton.nikola...@fmglobal.com
NEMA 250-1997, Supplement A describes applications, features and test
criteria of enclosures for hazardous (classified) locations.
Certification of products for hazardous (classified) locations is factory
mutual research's specialty. If I can be of service, please give me a call,
fax or email.
Go to:
Panel Components Corporation
P.O. Box 115, Oskaloosa, IA 52577 (U.S.A)E-mail:
Phone: 641-673-5000
http://www.panelcomponents.com
http://www.panelcomponents.com/scripts/wsisa.dll/P80FORM.p?w_part=88010200
For a picture of the connector:
Other than the EMC and Low Voltage Directives, does anyone know of any
additional directive that would be applicable to a 1/16 DIN panel mounted
temperature limit controller with manual reset ? Are there any applicable
directives for performance ?
Tony
Anton (Tony) J. Nikolassy
Factory Mutual
I also agree with Rich that independent accredited test organizations only
verify conformance to standards. A few of those standards are performance
based, but most are not. Even in Europe.
If I remember correctly, the object of the CE marking system was take down
trade barriers.
What is the difference between this newly proposed forum and what we have
now in the PSTC? It seems to address all of the same subjects.
Tony
Anton (Tony) J. Nikolassy
Project Engineer
Factory Mutual Research Corp.
1151 Boston-Providence Tpk.
Norwood, MA. 02062 U.S.A.
Phone: 781-255-4819
is this what your looking for?
Anton (Tony) J. Nikolassy
Project Engineer, Electrical Section
Factory Mutual Research Corp.
Ph: 781-255-4819
Fx: 781-762-9375
e-mail: anton.nikola...@factory-mutual.com
-Original Message-
From: WOODS, RICHARD
John,
I believe the issue here is that UL won't allow it without testing. If you
are looking to avoid testing, then you have no choice but to use design
materials specified by the table. If you are willing to have the design
tested, then any enclosure's bottom design complies if it passes the
Has anyone reviewed Jon Curtis' work in the June 1999 issue of Conformity?
Its title is OSHA's Electrical Standards, What it Covers and What it
Doesn't. It is a very complete assessment of the laws pertaining to this
subject.
Anton (Tony) J. Nikolassy
Project Engineer, Electrical Section
I would like to clarify a misconception about the CB SCHEME stated in
Mr. Juan P. Pena's contribution to the PSTC current conversation. e.g.;
The CB scheme only works with the official
organization in every country (UL in USA, VDE in Germany, etc.). For
example, all the German TUV's are outside
13 matches
Mail list logo
