In message 1412285639.63431.yahoomail...@web141402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com,
dated Thu, 2 Oct 2014, FW Miller
012cd6de8c7b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org writes:
First, my sympathies in that you have to go to LA: the Bay Area's
weather will be much better by comparison. As soon as you leave
In message
9be23e9ea1124ad19730e503fa709...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
, dated Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com
writes:
It my professional recommendation is that the Kalifornia wines be
considered HAZMAT. Mr. Woodgate should pursue the local 'micro-brew'
In message 008f01cfdea6$9709e820$c51db860$@cox.net, dated Thu, 2 Oct
2014, Ed Price edpr...@cox.net writes:
Just be sure to have an MSDS appended to your passport.
Already arranged.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate,
Just starting to dig into this - and haven't gotten to the legalese just yet
but headed that way. But so far what I've read would indicate that it doesn't
mandate removal of the chemicals - other than those already regulated such as
lead a Cadmium it appears that after analysis is you are above
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:06:14 AM
Subject: [PSES] California Prop 65
Just starting to dig into this – and haven’t gotten to the legalese just yet
but headed that way. But so far what I’ve read would indicate that it doesn’t
mandate removal of the chemicals
In message 86089981.284126.1412263641329.javamail.r...@comcast.net,
dated Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Mike Sherman - Original Message -
msherma...@comcast.net writes:
The basis of the law is that one should not expose citizens of
California to any of these chemicals known to the State of...
Yes, but must be in American and Spanglish.
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 8:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
In message 86089981.284126.1412263641329.javamail.r
: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
In message 86089981.284126.1412263641329.javamail.r...@comcast.net,
dated Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Mike Sherman - Original Message -
msherma
virus or other
defect. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:20 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
Yes, but must be in American and Spanglish.
-Original Message
[mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 9:14 AM
To: Gary McInturff
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
In message
c73f9f6e552843ee98b9b268c6ee5...@s-ais-exch01-13.esterline.net, dated Thu, 2
Oct 2014, Gary McInturff gary.mcintu...@esterline.com writes:
Nope even having
John:
First, my sympathies in that you have to go to LA: the Bay Area's weather will
be much better by comparison. As soon as you leave Customs/TSA, consider buying
a good bottle of California wine. With the lead, sulfites other
unmentionables (Acetaldehyde, Dimethyl Dicarbonate, Trypsin,
' - but temps should be under 38C. Good time to verify ESD immunity of your
equipment.
Brian
From: FW Miller [mailto:012cd6de8c7b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 2:34 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Fw: [PSES] California Prop 65
John:
First, my
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
In message 86089981.284126.1412263641329.javamail.r...@comcast.net,
dated Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Mike Sherman - Original Message -
msherma...@comcast.net writes:
The basis of the law is that one should not expose citizens of
California to any
12:13 PM
Subject:
Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
Proposition 65 requires businesses to notify Californians about
significant
amounts of chemicals in the products they purchase, in their homes or
workplaces, or that are released into the environment. By providing this
information, Proposition 65
* | * Schneider Electric ** | Solar Business* | *
CANADA* | *Regulatory Compliance Engineering*
From: Ed Price edpr...@cox.net To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG, Date:
07/11/2013
12:13 PM Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
--
Proposition 65 requires
*Warning*
Contains peanuts.
I wonder if it is a violation of Prop 65 to knowingly report as present
_substances one has not even looked for_.
They must be there; put up a sign! makes notification meaningless.
Cortland Richmond
ka5s
On 7/11/2013 2255, Scott Douglas wrote:
When I first came
Moshe
OEHHA is the lead agency for implementation of Proposition 65 (the Safe
Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code
section 25249.5 et seq. referred to as Proposition 65 or the Act). As part of
its responsibilities related to Proposition 65, OEHHA maintains
Hello team,
I am looking for California Prop 65 requirements and on which equipment or
when it is applied.
Can you please advise
Thanks
Moshe
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
I'm not familiar with this. Can you summarize?
The Other Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Moshe Henig
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:19 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG;
emc-pstc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: California Prop 65
Google/Bing/Yahoo are your friend. They only want your brain.
http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/background/p65plain.html
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Moshe Henig
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:19 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org;
or warning stickers, and almost nobody will notice
them.
Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
Google/Bing
Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
-Original Message-
From: Brian Oconnell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
Google/Bing/Yahoo are your friend. They only want your brain.
http
In message 006201ce7e6a$1b1fb8e0$515f2aa0$@cox.net, dated Thu, 11 Jul
2013, Ed Price edpr...@cox.net writes:
OTOH, just put up the signs or warning stickers, and almost nobody will
notice them.
Especially warn about DHMO and
4-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-beta-L-fructofuranoside. Almonds are bad,
. (256) 650-5261
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:29:01 +0100
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
In message 006201ce7e6a$1b1fb8e0$515f2aa0$@cox.net, dated Thu, 11 Jul
2013, Ed Price edpr...@cox.net writes:
OTOH, just
: Thursday, July 11, 2013 10:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] California Prop 65
Google/Bing/Yahoo are your friend. They only want your brain.
http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/background/p65plain.html
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p
25 matches
Mail list logo
