It isn't appropriate to refer to the ICNIRP publications. The correct
reference (for Europe) is to EN 50527-1 and EN 50527-2-1. Unfortunately,
these are not available free of charge. However, they are available at
reasonable prices (in English) at https://www.evs.ee/shop.
John Woodgate
testing at 50 mT.
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Andy [mailto:andy.mccal...@mottmac.com]
Sent: 06 July 2018 10:27
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Hi Bernd
It’s a mess but at this time no one seems to want to address
-Original Message-
From: Dürrer Bernd [mailto:bernd.duer...@wilo.com]
Sent: 06 July 2018 09:53
To: McCallum, Andy ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: AW: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Hello Andy,
Thank you for pointing out the ICNIRP limits: Actually, I recently
60601-1-2)
Kind regards,
Bernd
Von: McCallum, Andy
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Juli 2018 09:41
An: Dürrer Bernd ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: RE: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Bernd
Pacemakers have DC static magnetic field limits as low as 0.5mT as mentioned
.IEEE.ORG>
Betreff: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Hi Michael and the group,
With the exception tissue heating generated by some sources at very high
frequencies, I wonder if the EM field exposure worries today are a bit
overblown. I started my experiments in
to reduce the risk of
malfunction is to limit EM fields.
Stay in the best of health and have a nice weekend,
Bernd
Von: Doug Smith
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 20:56
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Hi Michael and the group
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Those college students’ knee jerk reaction to a scientific name for a
life-sustaining chemical is a perfect example of what I was saying below.
Over-the-top, but very apropos.
College students. Soon we will be at the point
-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 05 July 2018 22:04
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
"Do drink the water. Do not breathe t
In other words, become an "aquaphibian" (or something like that :) ) – “back to
the Future” J
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 05 July 2018 22:04
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Huma
Recently talked to an actuary-type mathematician and a Dept of Agriculture
scientist. They indicated that while mean life span once incrementally
increased during 20th century USA, the available 21st century data no longer
supports any future trend of consistent and incremental increases for
someone.
From: Ghery Pettit
Reply-To:
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 13:29:20 -0700
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Another chemical that is a problem in certain cases is Dihydrogen Monoxide.
See www.dhmo.org <http://www.dhmo.org> for more information.
is also known as
water.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 1:21 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
The precautionary principle, as harmless and common sense as it sounds, is
at the root of
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
There is another aspect to this, the 'precautionary principle'. This says that
if you don't know the harmful level of something, you reduce its level to
ALARP, 'as low as is reasonably practicable
2018 1:21 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
The precautionary principle, as harmless and common sense as it sounds, is
at the root of much mischief. Said mischief is not inherent in the
principle itself, but how it is used.
, 5 Jul 2018 20:34:07 +0100
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
There is another aspect to this, the 'precautionary principle'. This says
that if you don't know the harmful level of something, you reduce its level
to ALARP, 'as low as is reasonably
There is another aspect to this, the 'precautionary principle'. This
says that if you don't know the harmful level of something, you reduce
its level to ALARP, 'as low as is reasonably practicable'.
Unfortunately, of course, opinions differ very widely on what that level
is, in many cases.
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Be surprised if any LVD could cause EMF large enough to pose a danger
to Human Health. Intentional transmitters maybe, a rare beast to
create those levels unintentionally at less than 1000V
]
Sent: 05 July 2018 10:28
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
It applies to any LVD product, but there is a flow chart that shows that a
simple assessment is possible if the product has no reasonable likelihood of
producing
ssue under the
LVD.
Michael.
From: McCallum, Andy [mailto:andy.mccal...@mottmac.com]
Sent: 05 July 2018 15:33
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
Be surprised if any LVD could cause EMF large enough to pose a danger to
Hu
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
It applies to any LVD product, but there is a flow chart that shows that a
simple assessment is possible if the product has no reasonable likelihood of
producing sufficiently strong EMF.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
It applies to any LVD product, but there is a flow chart that shows
that a simple assessment is possible if the product has no reasonable
likelihood of producing sufficiently strong EMF.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions
It applies to any LVD product, but there is a flow chart that shows that
a simple assessment is possible if the product has no reasonable
likelihood of producing sufficiently strong EMF.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 11:10
An: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Betreff: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields
EN62311 is listed in OJ and a harmonized LVD standard.
Does EN62311apply to any LVD product or only products containing radio
transmitters?
Best reg
EN62311 is listed in OJ and a harmonized LVD standard.
Does EN62311apply to any LVD product or only products containing radio
transmitters?
Best regards
Amund
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
24 matches
Mail list logo
