Hello All,
After a number of disagreements with various customers about the industrial,
commercial, or medical test equipment ambiguity, I sent an inquiry to the FCC.
Please see the response below.
This should help.
Regards,
David Shidlowsky | Technical Reviewer
Address 1 Bat-Sheva St. POB 87,
[mailto:bob.sy...@gilbarco.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:56 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
In addition to Mr. Ward's words of wisdom below, it is probably worth
d yet? Glad it's Friday?
-Bob Sykes
From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 3:38 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal comp
, February 18, 2016 8:26 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
The original post was not class A vs. Class B, but whether any FCC requirement
applied. I can't see
@tamuracorp.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:21:52 +
> To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> Conversation: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B /
> ICES-003 applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
> Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PS
...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:29 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
I don’t think the answer can be found chapter and verse from some standard, but
look
is strictly prohibited. No warranty is made that the e-mail
or attachments(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. Thank you.
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 12:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15
: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:49 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
I interpreted the original post correctly this was a system that was developed
by the origin
for one
specific control purpose.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: dward <dw...@pctestlab.com>
Reply-To: dward <dw...@pctestlab.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:13:32 -0800
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 ap
s. Devices
designed for home use, such as consumer blood pressure meters, bathroom scales
and digital thermometers, do not fall under this exemption.
Bill
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:58 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re
that the e-mail
or attachments(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. Thank you.
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:58 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable
into the ocean☺
So what is the correct interpretation?
-Dave
From: Bill Stumpf [mailto:bstu...@dlsemc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 12:13 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
Dennis
, February 18, 2016 10:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
There is an intriguing aspect of Michaels original question. He states the
object is an “industrial personal
: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:04 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
There is an intriguing aspect of Michaels original
end up in someone’s home.
I hope this was helpful.
The Other Brian
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 1:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal
several devices each of which must have their particular FCC concerns
> addressed.
>
> Regards,
> Lauren Crane
>
> KLA-Tencor
> Public | Unrestricted
>
> From: Bill Stumpf [mailto:bstu...@dlsemc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:13 AM
> To: EMC
From: Bill Stumpf <bstu...@dlsemc.com>
Reply-To: Bill Stumpf <bstu...@dlsemc.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:13:21 +
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Conversation: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
Subject: Re:
AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
Dennis is 100% right. The exemption applies exclusively to products which are
industrial, commercial, or medical test equipment. The "test equi
t marketed to the consumer and
is not intended to be used in the home, then Class A applies.
Bill Stumpf
From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:06 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable
defect. Thank you.
From: dward [mailto:dw...@pctestlab.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:46 AM
To: 'Ted Eckert' <ted.eck...@microsoft.com>; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
<EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: RE: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicab
or other defect. Thank you.
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:37 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
Hello Michael
Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:27 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
Can anyone else chime in?
I thought the the whole point
-5261
From: Ted Eckert <ted.eck...@microsoft.com>
Reply-To: Ted Eckert <ted.eck...@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:42:58 +
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Conversation: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal com
se of my
employer.
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:28 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
I have to ask, not as an expert on this topic, b
:37:22 +
To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Conversation: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003
applicable/mandatory for an industrial personal computer?
Subject: Re: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory
for an industrial personal computer?
Hello Michael,
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart B / ICES-003 applicable/mandatory for an
industrial personal computer?
Hi,
I am sorry if my question was answered anytime before. Nevertheless here my
question:
An European manufacturer has applied EN 61326-1 and EN 61010-1 for an
industrial
in US/Canada?
Is ICES-003 mandatory for Canada? If not in my understanding ICES-001 is also
not applicable.
Is § 15.123 "exempted devices" (A digital device used exclusively as industrial,
commercial, or medical test equipment.) for US applicable? If yes, 47 CFR Part
18 is in my
. Afterwards a
trickle mode is started to conserve the charge state. The charger operates
through a 230V AC power-supply.
It will be used in general and industries environment.
Question:
Does this trickle charging device fall under the provisions of 47 CFR Part
15? What are the equipment authorization
Bing, Yahoo, Google
Class A? Class B? Will it be used on Jupiter or Uranus?
OET BULLETIN 62
47CFR15.103
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Inken Green
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:59 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: US FCC 47 CFR Part 15
All too true. That GPO web site is the best source.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Ward
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:23 AM
To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: 47 CFR
Actually, for 47CFR by the time they reach hard
...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:13 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: 47 CFR
In message
4c5e6457cd7911469a07260381288c2861c63...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com,
dated Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com writes:
Those are so old
In message
4c5e6457cd7911469a07260381288c2861c63...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com,
dated Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com writes:
Those are so old that they aren't really good for much.
A 'standards year' is about 0.1 calendar year?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try
Those are so old that they aren't really good for much.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brian O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 7:19 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: 47 CFR
Hello Grace,
Perhaps you could donate to a local school
Hello Grace,
Perhaps you could donate to a local school or your local public library ?
Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Grace Lin
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 6:54 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: 47 CFR
Dear Members,
I have a hardcopy
Dear Members,
I have a hardcopy of the following 47 CFR that I don't want to keep anymore.
They are in good condition (I might just flip over once or twice). Please let
me know if you are interested in. Free of charge plus free ground shipping in
the US.
47 CFR Part 80 to End, 2001
47 CFR
In message 4b267a3d.9040...@sbcglobal.net, dated Mon, 14 Dec 2009,
Fred Townsend ftowns...@sbcglobal.net writes:
I would ask the group to comment on how successful and how expensive
the band-aid approach to solving EMI problems.
Zero to infinity. I know of one case requiring the addition of 24
Hi Gary,
Hey, don't complain! Poor designs keep us EMC engineers fully employed!
I've run into this myself on occasion - that is, until I started educating our
designers. :-)
Try running a -short- ground connection from the PC board ground at the
video connector to the nearest chassis ground.
I believe 3M makes the cable and connectors. It's not pretty and the cable
becomes stiff and unwieldy. Expensive too.
I would ask the group to comment on how successful and how expensive the
band-aid approach to solving EMI problems.
Fred Townsend
DC to Light
McInturff, Gary wrote:
In message
d500012385dca64883637ab4ccf491e3ded...@ms-cda-02.advanced-input.com,
dated Mon, 14 Dec 2009, McInturff, Gary
gmcintu...@advanced-input.com writes:
I have a cable shielding need between a video display and a base unit ?
but the connectors
Exactly what are these connectors? I ask,
We have a poor design handed to us and trying to figure out the easiest way of
adding some shielding with having to modify enclosures etc.
I have a cable shielding need between a video display and a base unit – but
the connectors are located inside the respective housings so I can’t use
...@interferencetechnology.com
From: Christopher [mailto:cksal...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 7:19 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] FCC DFS testing, Title 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart E
Folks,
I have a question regarding DFS testing for our RF experts.
We manufacture point
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: FCC DFS testing, Title 47 CFR Part 15 Subpart E
Folks,
I have a question regarding DFS testing for our RF experts.
We manufacture point to point wirless devices.
One NRTL lab told us that we need to test only one band 5.3GHz while the other
NRTL lab asked us
Folks,
I have a question regarding DFS testing for our RF experts.
We manufacture point to point wirless devices.
One NRTL lab told us that we need to test only one band 5.3GHz while the other
NRTL lab asked us to test both bands i.e. 5.6GHz and 5.3GHz band?
Question? Can we
...@niros.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:30 AM
To: 'ITL-EMC User Group'; Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail)
Subject: SV: 47 CFR Part 90
Dear David,
As far as I know the latest version of 47 CFR Part 90 is from 1998, you can
download the PDF file from:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology
Hi David,
Yesterday I was able to download entire rule parts at this url:
http://www.gpo.gov/ecfr/
The rules are updated daily on this site so you have the most current versions.
Today the site seems to have connection problems, but as I remember the
process you
- pick Title 47 from the pull
From: Price, Ed
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:03 AM
To: 'ITL-EMC User Group'
Subject: RE: 47 CFR Part 90
From: ITL-EMC User Group [mailto:itl-...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:03 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail)
Subject: 47 CFR Part 90
Dear All,
Does anyone know
David,
Try this web site. http://www.acc
ss.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_02/47cfrv5_02.html
Regards,
Rocky
-)-(-
From: ITL-EMC User Group [mailto:itl-...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:03 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Group (E-mail)
Subject: 47 CFR Part 90
Dear All,
Does anyone
Dear David,
As far as I know the latest version of 47 CFR Part 90 is from 1998, you can
download the PDF file from:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/cfr/1998/
Newer parts from 47 CFR can be found at:
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/cfr/1999
Dear All,
Does anyone know where I can download the latest version of FCC Rule 47 Part
90 (47CFR90) in pdf format?
I would prefer to download the whole part in one file.
Thanks to anyone who can assist.
Regards
David Shidlowsky
Technical Writer
EMC Laboratory
ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
650 726 1252
At 12:37 PM -0600 8/31/99, JENKINS, JEFF wrote:
Does anyone know if there are laws that require semiconductor processing
equipment and other types of industrial equipment to conform to FCC 47 CFR
Part 18? From time to time we get inquiries about this and we're wondering
what
At 12:37 PM 8/31/99 -0600, JENKINS, JEFF wrote:
Does anyone know if there are laws that
require semiconductor processing equipment
and other types of industrial equipment to
conform to FCC 47 CFR Part 18? From time
to time we get inquiries about this and
we're wondering what
Does anyone know if there are laws that require semiconductor processing
equipment and other types of industrial equipment to conform to FCC 47 CFR
Part 18? From time to time we get inquiries about this and we're wondering
what is behind it.
Thanks,
Jeff Jenkins
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc
Jon Curtis is right about the FCC regulations
in saying that emission measurements
made for European compliance will in general
sufice for FCC regulations, especially if you
are in one of the classes for which fully
compliant measurements are not mandatory
and you are reponding to the
, sensors, etc--in our controls that are built into this
equipment.
Question: do we have to comply with the FCC regs, Title 47 CFR
15, subpart A (b), as an unintentional radiator?
thanks!
Mike Sherman
Product Safety Engineer
FSI International
(612) 361-8140
m_sher...@delphi.com
with the FCC regs, Title 47 CFR
15, subpart A (b), as an unintentional radiator?
thanks!
Mike Sherman
Product Safety Engineer
FSI International
(612) 361-8140
m_sher...@delphi.com
55 matches
Mail list logo
