RE: Class I Division 1 versus Class I Division 2

2001-03-16 Thread Jody Leber
Robert, I don't have the answer, but if you review Article 500 of the National Electric Code (NEC) and UL's website you may be enlightened. http://www.ul.com/hazloc/ Best Regards, Jody Leber Laboratory Manager jle...@ustech-lab.com http://www.ustech-lab.com U. S. Technologies 3505 Francis

Re: Class I Division 1 versus Class I Division 2

2001-03-15 Thread cnewton
Div 1 = normally hazardous. Div 2 = only hazardous in the event of a failure (e.g. ventilation breakdown, pipe/tank rupture). For that reason, Div 2 hardware need only pass in the normal operating state, no circuit faults are considered. The logic being applied is that two unrelated faults

RE: Class I Division 1 versus Class I Division 2

2001-03-15 Thread Kevin Robinson
Robert, Check out the National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Article 500-7(a) and 500-7(b) for your answer, but simply stated, In a Division 1 location, the hazardous atmosphere is assumed to be present under normal conditions, and a Division 2 location, the hazardous atmosphere is present under

Re: Class I Division 1 versus Class I Division 2

2001-03-15 Thread Jacob Schanker
Robert: To my best recollection, the essential difference is that Div. 2 is an environment subject to occasional presence (leaks) of flammable/explosive gases, while Div. 1 is where this stuff is always present or potentially present. I suppose this is a simplification, but I think it expresses

Re: Class I Division 1 versus Class I Division 2

2001-03-15 Thread Art Michael
Hello Robert, A visit to the Safety Link www.safetylink.com and an in-page search on the term hazloc will deliver you to a spot within the Safety Link with several very good tutorials and other resources on this topic. Regards, Art Michael Int'l Product Safety News A.E. Michael, Editor 166