Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-24 Thread Rich Nute
Hello from San Diego: Kevin Harris asks some questions about temperature measurements. 1. Is this a valid temperature measurement for the PCB? I'm of two minds on this. It could said that I'm really measuring the diodes temperature and not the PCB. On the other hand the diode pad

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-18 Thread Doug McKean
...@compaq.com To: 'dmck...@paragon-networks.com'; 'IEEE Product Safety Technical Committee -' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN 60950 and component heating Date: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 4:27 PM Doug, To answer your question of which is better: The primary concern should

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-18 Thread Egon H. Varju
Mark: I don't really think that you'd want to have a shiny, conductive piece of aluminium foil bouncing around inside your power supply, shorting things out and compromising your spacings. These self-adhesives don't last too long under ageing ... Cheers, Egon :-)

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-17 Thread Doug McKean
Hi Kevin, I had a rather bad experience between UL and CSA in the older days when there wasn't so much discussion and agreement between them. I had set up an MOU between them with UL as the test location. Went like this ... Switching power supply. Has a transformer. Must do abnormals

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-17 Thread Lesmeister, Glenn
Product Safety Technical Committee - Subject:Re: EN 60950 and component heating Hi Kevin, I had a rather bad experience between UL and CSA in the older days when there wasn't so much discussion and agreement between them. I had set up an MOU between them with UL as the test location

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread DouglasScott
Kevin, Good question. By measuring the pad there are several items to consider. 1st, is the thermocouple in electrical contact with the pad? If so, you may have an incorrect reading caused by currents from the pad through the probe. 2nd, In measuring the pad, you are measuring the junction

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Mark Hone
To add to Art Michael's ways used to work around the problem of PCBs getting too hot, if the heat is being radiated (rather than conducted through the leads) from the component to the PCB, put a shiny reflective surface on the PCB (self adhesive aluminium foil, or just an area of copper on the

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread jeichner
We run into this quite often, and yes, I do consider the PCB measurement to be a valid measurement of the PCB temperature whether you are on a pad, a trace, or laminate. My experience with agencies is that they agree, and will allow (for example) a power resistor to be as hot as it's

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Farnsworth,Heber
Good point. Local heating can damage a board locally. Although people often do not test the way you indicate, I've seen several failures due to long-term heat aging of the board under a hot component. Some things I've done: 1. Space the component body off the board and/or use longer leads to

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Art Michael
Hello Kevin, This is not an uncommon problem as you have probably guessed. Rather than get embroiled in discussing the details of what one should measure, I'd rather offer a couple of ways I've seen used to work around the problem. A) Assuming you are using leaded diodes; Raise the diode off of