Alas,
you forget that there is a world outside of PC's and Coms;-
Derek.
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To can
<14.184d3188.28a40...@aol.com>, lfresea...@aol.com inimitably wrote:
>the
>component side has too great a skyline to give good results.
Not these days! Anything more than 5 mm tall and the product won't fit
in your pocket. *Everything* has to fit in your pocket(;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, O
Hi all,
I have an EMScan system that I used for debugging boards. I have mixed
feelings, but for somethings it really helps. If anyone would like their
board scanned to see if it would help them, let me know off line: I'm really
cheap;-
As for high frequency, the resolution of the grid is
RE: EMSCAN (was TV nostalgia/EMI sniffer goggle)
- Original Message -
From: Frank Krozel
To: George Stults ; 'Ehler, Kyle' ; 'Ken Javor' ;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: EMSCAN (was TV nostalgia/EMI sniffer goggle)
RE: EMSCAN (was TV nostalgia/EMI sniffer goggle)Hi George:
You are most correct the earlier units did only have frequency coverage to
1.0Ghz, but the newer units go up to 2.7Ghz.
Frank Krozel
Frank Krozel
TEL: 630-924-1600
FAX: 630-924-1668
MOBILE: 630-258-5421 (24/7)
TEL: 630-653-9090 Home
little over 1GHz on the top end at that time. We didn’t buy
> it, because we had harmonics above 1 GHz.
>
> -George
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:keh...@lsil.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: 'Ken Javor'; emc-
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line
eadings.
btw I dont work for, or have any connection with, EMSCAN.
kyle
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 5:58 PM
To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: TV nostalgia
You could use an array of very s
In a recent response of "TV Nostalgia" Dale Svetanoff suggested a link to
the Antique Wireless Association
http://www.antiquewireless.org/
Looking through this link I was fascinated by some of the early issues
regarding electronic devices power with tubes. Additionally there was
vetanoff
Rockwell Collins
rbus...@es.com@majordomo.ieee.org on 08/03/2001 04:02:21 PM
Please respond to rbus...@es.com
Sent by: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
cc:
Subject: RE: TV nostalgia
How about the reported X-Ray emissions from the old high volt
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:29 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: TV nostalgia
<95fbd8b0830ed511b7720002a51363f1319...@exw-ks.ks.lsil.com>, Ehler, Kyle
inimitably wrote:
>Doug has touched
<20010806225804.SIIR21723.femail41.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]>,
Ken Javor inimitably wrote:
>You could use an array of very short dipoles or small loops and gain in
>resolution by giving up efficiency, meaning that the viewer would have to be
>near the source.
Well, very short dipoles c
he IC!) the emissions were coming from!
Check out http://www.etsi.co.uk
Best regards
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ehler, Kyle [SMTP:keh...@lsil.com]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:08 PM
To: 'Doug McKean'; EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject:RE: TV nostalgi
PCB and
the device maps hot spots. But clearly you will never get optical or IR
viewer resolutions.
--
>From: John Woodgate
>To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: Re: TV nostalgia
>Date: Mon, Aug 6, 2001, 12:28 PM
>
>
> <95fbd8b0830ed511b7720002a51363f1319...@ex
lso harass on a per sample
basis in situ mfg. product.
-kyle, KC0IQE
-Original Message-
From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@corp.auspex.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: TV nostalgia
Now, if we could just train ou
<95fbd8b0830ed511b7720002a51363f1319...@exw-ks.ks.lsil.com>, Ehler, Kyle
inimitably wrote:
>Doug has touched on what I think would be a great tool for the
>EMI hunter...but rather than a 'sniffer', a 'goggle' similar
>to what Geordi wears that facilitates the direct viewing of EM ra
]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:28 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: TV nostalgia
>-Original Message-
>From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:36 PM
>To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: TV nostalgia
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 3:36 PM
>To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: TV nostalgia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Okay... more nostalgia and a bit on safety
>back in those days... s
u mfg. product.
-kyle, KC0IQE
-Original Message-
From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@corp.auspex.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: TV nostalgia
Now, if we could just train ourselves to sniff out some of
those pesky EMI problems ...
- Doug McKean
<200108032155.raa05...@interlock2.lexmark.com>, oover...@lexmark.com
inimitably wrote:
>Ever notice how connected one's memory and smells are connected?
>Think about the number of things, both good and bad, that particular smells
>recall.
Nerves from the nose go to a very primitive part of the bra
> I have noticed several responses related to the smell of the old
equipment.
> I had been thinking the very same thing.
>
> You could trouble-shoot by the type of smell a failed component
produced (cap
> vs. resistor, vs choke, etc.)
>
> Ever notice how connected one's memory and smells are conne
Subject: RE: TV nostalgia
I have noticed several responses related to the smell of the old equipment.
I had been thinking the very same thing.
You could trouble-shoot by the type of smell a failed component produced (cap
vs. resistor, vs choke, etc.)
Ever notice how connected one's m
<95fbd8b0830ed511b7720002a51363f1319...@exw-ks.ks.lsil.com>, Ehler, Kyle
inimitably wrote:
>If they were'nt 'hand wired' who/what would have wired the chassis?
>robots? chimpanzees?
Chimpanzees have hands - four of them, really. The implication was that
sets that were not hand-wired were assembl
he%es@interlock.lexmark.com
To: emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: RE: TV nostalgia
How about the reported X-Ray emissions from the old high voltage regulators
and the 25-35KV anode voltages? Those old color sets were beasts.
It is interesti
ssage-
From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:keh...@lsil.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 1:38 PM
To: 'Ralph Cameron'; 'EMC and Safety list'
Subject: RE: TV nostalgia
Which reminds me of other oddball video contraptions.
A few years back I had to dispose of a Heathkit GR-2000 25" TV w
x27;s something pleasant (or nostalgic) about the smell of a
tube type radio or TV. Perhaps it's just my age.
Rick Busche
-Original Message-
From: Ehler, Kyle [mailto:keh...@lsil.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 2:38 PM
To: 'Ralph Cameron'; 'EMC and Safety list&#
x27;s were 94V0 and,
typical of Heath products,
documented more than thoroughly. Very well made!
kyle
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Cameron [mailto:ral...@igs.net]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Ehler, Kyle; 'Rich Nute'; 'EMC and Safety list'
Subject: Re: TV
my mentor.
-kyle
-Original Message-
From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:36 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: TV nostalgia
Okay... more nostalgia and a bit on safety
back in those days... so that we don't
"John Woodgate" wrote:
> Rich Nute wrote:
> >In the mid-fifties, GE came out with a
> >transformerless 17-inch TV. One side of
> >the power line was tied to the chassis
> >(2-wire plug back in those days). The
> >only protection was the plastic knob on
> >the shafts of the various controls. Whe
If they were'nt 'hand wired' who/what would have wired the chassis?
robots? chimpanzees?
Its funny how the public is led to believe that accepted status quo
is somehow better than an emerging technology, but then as Jack
points out, paper/phenolic was the best the technology had to offer
at accepta
-
From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:36 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: TV nostalgia
Okay... more nostalgia and a bit on safety
back in those days... so that we don't stray
too far from the subject matter of this
forum.
My first TV
<200108022235.paa26...@epgc196.sdd.hp.com>, Rich Nute
inimitably wrote:
>In the mid-fifties, GE came out with a
>transformerless 17-inch TV. One side of
>the power line was tied to the chassis
>(2-wire plug back in those days). The
>only protection was the plastic knob on
>the shafts of the va
Okay... more nostalgia and a bit on safety
back in those days... so that we don't stray
too far from the subject matter of this
forum.
My first TV was a Motorola 7-inch round in
a Bakelite cabinet. The speaker was the
same size as the CRT.
My second was the famous RCA 10-inch round
chassis w
33 matches
Mail list logo
