Tom;
Try The following site:
http://diamond.spawar.navy.mil/specs/wise/wiseup/
Alternately, if 461D and 462 is what you're looking for, they are
available on my web page as well.
Andy Garcia
Lead EMC/Safety Engineer
Coulter Corporation
E-Mail: argar...@icanect.net
Web: http
Anyone please tell me where to get Mil-Std? I used to
know it's somewhere in Princeton, NJ or Philidelphia
area. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
I read an article saying IEC61326 will become an EN standard for EMC for
Laboratory Equipment. What is the mandatory date for this to replace
En50081-1/EN55011 and EN50082-1 that we have been using?
Any other information related the 61326 would be helpful.
Thanks,
Tom Becker
Compliance
Tom Bao wrote:
Anyone please tell me where to get Mil-Std? I used to
know it's somewhere in Princeton, NJ or Philidelphia
area. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
Tom,
Try: Standardization
on the web? I surf around and found little.
Probably not many people in the group interested in the topic. If some
of you are interested, I'll setup a web page for SAR. It may benefit
others when SAR is getting hotter.
Best regards,
Tom Bao
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
the frequency and duration
of utility power outages? The areas I am most interested in are North and South
America and Europe.
Thanks.
Tom Brose
tbr...@aksys.com
...@lucent.com, not the group. I'll
summarize and post it if the group is interested in it.
TIA,
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
Will Australia accept a test report to EN55022:1987 for proof of compliance to
AS/NZS 3548? Or must I provide a report to EN55022:1994?
Thanks to the group in advance.
Tom Crabtree
Datasouth Computer Corp.
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your
watt limits. In other words, there
is no such case that the EUT meet the per watt limits but not the
maximum current limits. What's the purpose to have seperate limits
for Class D equipment? Or do I miss something or have the wrong
concepts? TIA
Best regards,
Tom
RCIC = http://uc.com
are now archived in RCIC. It's probably in your interests.
Best regards,
Tom
RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
Tom Bao asks about what configurations make products Pluggable Equipment Type B.
Where North America is concerned, this was discussed at UL and it was
essentially determined that any attachment plug other than , ANSI/NEMA 1-15P,
5-15P and 5-20P (the 125V, 15A and 20A plugs) makes ITE Pluggable
Tom,
The definition I've heard for this is big twisty. The current
rating is usually 30 A or more, the plug is twisted into the socket,
hence the name. Usually applies to equipment that stays in place.
Eric Petitpierre
Pulsecom
Herndon, VA
er...@pulse.com
in general compliance info.
81% of those interested in emc.
85% of those interested in safety.
57% of those interested in telecomm.
Thanks again for the opportunity you gave me.
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
regards,
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
At 05:04 PM 5/13/97 +0100, Peter Phillips wrote:
I have recently started looking into the uncertainty associated with EMC
measurements, I have three documents published in the UK, NIS 80, 81 and
3003 which cover
At 11:30 AM 8/28/97 -0400, Tom Bao wrote:
Anyone please tell me where to get Mil-Std? I used to
know it's somewhere in Princeton, NJ or Philidelphia
area. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Tom
RCIC - http://www.rcic.com
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
__ Safety
__ Telecommunication regulation
__ Others
I'll let you know the results. Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Tom
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
http://www.rcic.com
FYI.
From: Tom Donnelly tdonne...@lucent.com
Subject: Jokes text
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:41:27 -0400
Sender: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org
Virus Warning Message
Found virus SHS_STAGES.A in file LIFE_STAGES.TXT.SHS
.
Tom Bao
t...@superlink.net
Courtesy of RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
Enter 'czech' in the conference content search at the bottom of the
page. You'll find all the messages which contain 'czech'. The URL is
http://uc.com/bin/dbml.exe?Template=/rcic/vch.dbmSubject=Age=14Xgroup=
Tom Bao
t...@superlink.net
Courtesy of RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
requirements. Appreciate your comments.
Tom Bao
t...@superlink.net
Courtesy of RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
Hello everyone,
I'm reading 1.2.5.1, 1.2.5.2 IEC-950. One thing which is not very
clear to me is the industrial plug and socket-outlet. Anyone has a
definition for them, or which standard specifies it? TIA
Tom Bao
t...@superlink.net
Courtesy of RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
Does anybody know of any specifications or standards re intrinsic safety of
low power (FCC Part 15) 125 kHz magnetic field transmitters? These TX's
are usually employed to read tags or cards for door entry, security, etc.
Thanks,
Tom Cokenias
RFI/EMC Consultant
Palo Alto, CA
ph 415-493-4219
the
possibility of your AC cord acting like a transmit antenna.
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC Radio Type Approvals
Gary,
TCF format is not specified in the Directive but you should make sure yours
contains the information required therein, and that it is in a format that
your competent body finds acceptable, since they will be doing the
assessment.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
EMC Consultant
650-726-1262
The requirement for 30 meter testing was removed in EN 55022-1995. The
current distance requirement for both Class A and Class B is testing at 10
meters.
Tom Donnelly
EMC Engineer
Lucent Technologies
tdonne...@lucent.com
Does anyone know the beamwidth of the Schaffner CBL6140A BiLog Antenna?
Tom Donnelly
EMC Compliance Engineer
Lucent Technologies
tdonne...@lucent.com
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single
that they would be excluded, but neither do I see how they should be
tested.
Thanks for your consideration.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
fax 650 726 1252
cell 650 302 0887
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product
Hi Barry:
Unfortunately, Tom Bao, curator of the RCIC
archives, has been unable to keep up all of
the archive functions.
Tom is currently looking for someone to take
over the archives. He will be happy to send
details of the job to any interested party.
I did a non-comprehensive search
?
Author: Tom Bao t...@superlink.net at internet
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:1/14/97 20:33
Can anyone give me some background or history information on how the
radiated and conducted emission limits were determined by FCC and CISPR, in
terms of the field strength level? Any
, TIA.
Best regards,
Tom
Regulatory Compliance Information Center
http://www.rcic.com
Littleton, MA 01460 fax (508) 486-8828
http://world.std.com/~csweb
On Tue, 14 Jan 1997, Tom Bao wrote:
Can anyone give me some background or history information on how the
radiated and conducted emission limits were determined by FCC and CISPR, in
terms of the field strength level
I'm posting this for a friend. Thanks for your help
Tom Cokenias
I'm dealing with a powerline surge requirement issue regarding high
end computers and servers products - i.e. IEC 801-4, IEC 1000-4-4,
ANSI/IEEE C62.41. I'm looking for industry practices regarding the
selection
Tom,
Be warned, something like this was tried by a UK manufacturer. They failed
the tests, then persauded a Competent body to sign off a TCF stating that the
failed tests were not applicable or were unpassable by their equipment. They
then CE marked and placed on the market. Within
You are invited to our next IEEE EMC Society Chapter Meeting
February 17, Wednesday
IEC Conducted Immunity Standards - Edition 2 Updates 2004 - 2009
IEC 61000-4-2, -4, -5, -11 standards revisions and their implications to the
practicing EMC Test Engineer
Speaker: Tom Revesz, HV Technologies
You are invited to our next IEEE EMC Society Chapter Meeting
February 17, Wednesday
IEC Conducted Immunity Standards -
Edition 2 Updates 2004 - 2009
IEC 61000-4-2, -4, -5, -11 standards revisions and their implications to the
practicing EMC Test Engineer
Speaker: Tom Revesz, HV Technologies
was right…
From: hansm [mailto:hans.mellb...@baclcorp.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 4:21 PM
To: Pettit, Ghery; Tom Cokenias; Derek Walton; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: You've just got to see this!
Actually one needs shielded clothing, much more profitable. However, no
guarantee
SCV EMC Society Meeting
Tuesday, April 10, 2001
RADIATED EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTS ABOVE 1 GHz
Speaker: Tom Cokenias
The April meeting of the Santa Clara Valley EMC Society will be held at SGI in
Mountain View, 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy., building 40, in the Presentation Center
above the lobby
The rationale offered by Tom Cokenias is fine for
equipment that is always configured with cables on
all connectors. The pins would then would not
come within the criteria that I suggested of
the user being reasonably expected to touch
them. However many items of equipment are
designed
Tom,
To be precise, EN 61326:1997 does not replace the generics. But in our terms,
since
it affects almost everything my company (and maybe yours) makes, the effect is
the
same. So in time we will no longer be able to use the generic EMC standards.
EN 61326's scope is actually wider than
is
http://www.rcic.com/default.htm. Check out the Virtual Conference Hall
and do a search on EMC-PSTC.
Thanks to Tom Bao and the others that keep this site going.
Ray Russell
ray_russ...@gastmfg.com
Pat,
Try Fischer Custom Communications Inc - I think he makes his own absorbing
clamp tel 310-891-0635 fax 310-891-0644 Ask for Alan or Fred Fischer
Maybe Solar Electronics as well in North Hollywood CA - 800-952-5302, ask
for Roy Talley
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
EMC Radio Type Approvals
Group,
Does anyone know of the requirements for demo equipment in Japan.
Specifically, a broadband digital transmitter that a customer wants to
evaluate. Does the demo unit have to meet all regulatory requirements?
Tom Donnelly
EMC Compliance Engineer
Lucent Technologies
tdonne...@lucent.com
At the end of last year Chinese authorities announced their
intent to impose EMC requirements on certain import commodities under
the existing CCIB/CCEE safety requirements. Does any body know the
status ?
Thanks to all.
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC and Radio Approvals
On 12 Nov 2003, Tom wrote
If you are so sure that your product complies with the protection
requirements of the EMC Directive even if it failed to pass the test,
you have chance to use TCF Route instead of the Standard Route.
Regards,
Tom
Tom, could you explain your thinking on this a little
Actually one needs shielded clothing, much more profitable. However, no
guarantee on telepathic waves. Hard to shield.
http://www.lessemf.com/personal.html
Hans Mellberg
- Original Message -
From: Pettit, mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com Ghery
To: Tom Cokenias mailto:t
Tom
I used to work for a telecom UPS company and we used data on lighting
that I think was compilied from the National Weather Service. We used
this data because there was such a strong correlation between lightning
activity and incidence of power outages. Florida was definitely the
highest
Tom/Jim-
I do have the SBC TP76200MP document (dated 12/30/98), but I was asking
about TR-406. Anyone familiar with that document? Is the TR-406
requirement equivalent to this SBC TP76200MP requirement? thanks
D
Tom Lavka wrote:
FYI...The most recent revision of TP76200MP is December 30
-----
From: Tom Coughlin
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 9:54 AM
To: ri...@ieee.org
Subject: Help with petition to be an IEEE President Elect candidate in 2021
Hello folks and best wishes for 2021!
I am an active and long-time IEEE volunteer, involved and very productive in
MGA, TA, SA an
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting today, March 24th, at the Holiday Inn,
Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at 7:00
PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Tom Revesz, EMC
Sales
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting next Wednesday, March 24th, at the Holiday
Inn, Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at
7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Tom Revesz,
EMC
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting on Wednesday, March 24th, at the Holiday Inn,
Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at 7:00 PM
and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Tom Revesz, EMC
in, for example, solder in electronic components,
and we need to remove most of lead in electronic assemblies unless
it is excempted under other clauses of the Directive.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/
Tom,
ask Harold Moses at the RTCA.
hmo...@rtca.org
Cheers,
Derek Walton
L F Research
This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post
7:30 Meeting
WHERE: Lucent Technologies
Warrenville Naperville Roads
Naperville
(for directions, call Tom Braxton,
630-979-1299)
SPEAKER: Dr. Clifford Kraft, Lucent Technologies
TOPIC: Effects
John
The California IBM virus appears to be a hoax, per Symantec:
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/california.ibm.hoax.html
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263fax 650 726 1252
,
subscribe emc-pstc your_email_address
I maintain a web site with regulatory information probably
in your interestes, the URL is
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering
Again, nice to see Chinese frm China. Your name sounds
familiar.
Best regards,
Tom Bao
On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, YANG Hai-Tao wrote:
in this process. I would like to hear from
other safety professionals how you handle the situation. TIA.
Tom Bao
t...@superlink.net
Courtesy of RCIC
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
then not be accessible to the user, and the
vulnerability of the EUT can be still tested at locations where cable type
may not afford much protection, eg, where flat ribbon or unshielded cables
are employed.
Tom Cokenias.
and not
realize it, especially when measuring low frequencies at a large span. If
it happens again, disconnect the input cable RF and see if any spikes
remain - you'll probably see the 0 Hz retrace line.
Hope this helps
Tom Cokenias
RFI/EMC Consultant
categories of faqs.
Tom Cokenias
RFI/EMC Consultant
portion
of the cable seemed to provide the biggest improvement, especially on
vertical attenuation.
Tom Cokenias
EMC Consultant
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc
covers and shields in the right places at the right thicknesses may
do the trick of keeping cable shells and other susceptible areas at
sufficient separations to prevent ESD discharges.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
EMC Consultant/RF Transmitter Type Approvals
Folks,
How does one provide ESD immunity
a must. Must be knowledgeable in IT product
regulations and certification schemes worldwide.
Accuracy, attention to detail and responsiveness to customers are critical.
If interested contact:
Tom Griffin
Manager
SCI Systems Inc.
PO Box 1000 MS 346
Huntsville Al 35807
205-882-4869 (Phone)
205
(3100 Bowers)faces Bowers Avenue and is accessible by driveway.
For a more detailed map, please check the EMC society website at
www.scvemc.org
or you may email me directly:
t...@tncokenias.org
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726
Dear Tom,
Thanks for your information. May I ask a few more questions regarding
compliance to EMC in Japan for non-specific electrical appliances, Is it
voluntary or mandatory? Is METI the regulator? Where can I learn more about
all these information?
Thanks and regards
Paul Chan
down menu, choose rule part, click on one of the
paragraphs. At the top of the page there is a link that says View Part.
The entire rule part can be downloaded as a web archive or HTML source. You
could convert to pdf later.
Good luck.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O
Hi Tom:
Although I can't help clear the confusion in IEC 60601-2-47, there are
some IEC 60601-2-x standards that require power line magnetic field
testing at high levels. The one that I came across was IEC 60601-2-22
(safety of infusion pumps), which required 400 A/m.
I can only assume
S.p.A.
SMC PG MW ST EMC Safety
SS Padana sup. KM 158 20060 Cassina de' Pecchi (MI) Italy
phone +39 02 9526 6587fax +39 02 9526 6375
mobile +39 348 3690185
e-mail paolo.ge...@siemens.com
_
From: Tom Cokenias [mailto:t...@tncokenias.org]
Sent
Sounds about right. Even your organization fits!
From: Tom Cokenias [mailto:t...@tncokenias.org]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:29 PM
To: Pettit, Ghery; Derek Walton; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: You've just got to see this!
Have obtained knock-offs from China - now offering them
Tom -
FWIW, the link provided below leads to the self-same file as
the bottom link on the URL provided by John. And it's no
longer at the bottom of the page, it's the first bulleted
list item on the page.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Tom Cokenias
Sent: Saturday
[mailto:jrbar...@iglou.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 7:14 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; Tom Cokenias
Subject: Re: Changes to FCC Part 15 (July 12, 2004 Version)
Tom,
It looks like the FCC changed their web page
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/rules/
while I was comparing the standards and writing my post
towards a reverb chamber to get
around small antenna beam width issues.
Any leads for a test house, or advice on doing this testing is appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
973-428-9898 x445
tdonne...@act-sys.com
Hi Tom,
you may want to talk to the folks
URL:
http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html
and the Japanese version, courtesy Tom Sato, at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq/
The latest versions should appear there in the next few days.
The textfiles may be accessed at:
Part 1: http
:
http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html
and the Japanese version, courtesy Tom Sato, at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq/
The latest versions should appear there in the next few days.
The textfiles may be accessed at:
Part 1: http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk
Sam
France announced they will harmonize in Jan 2001. I'm still looking
around for notice re Spain.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263
At 8:32 AM -0400 10/16/00, Wismer, Sam wrote:
Group:
I am hearing from my
:
http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html
and the Japanese version, courtesy Tom Sato, at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq/
The latest version should appear there in the next few days.
The textfiles may be accessed at:
Part 1: http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk
all,
Tom
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel
:
http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html
and the Japanese version, courtesy Tom Sato, at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq/
The latest version should appear there in the next few days.
The textfiles may be accessed at:
Part 1: http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk
:
http://world.std.com/~techbook/compliance_faq.html
and the Japanese version, courtesy Tom Sato, at:
http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/seec-faq/
The latest version should appear there in the next few days.
The textfiles may be accessed at:
Part 1: http://www.lyons.demon.co.uk
the appropriate limit for unwanted emission.
Hope this helps.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263fax 650 726 1252 page 800 759 pin 630 2820
At 8:37 AM -0600 5/24/00, JENKINS, JEFF wrote:
I have a question about
Dear Tom:
Thank you for your reminder. I don't have a copy of CISPR 22: 2003. I do
have a copy of CISPR 22: 2005 Fifth Edition. Do you know if there is any
difference for the requirement of an ISN between the versions 2003 and 2005?
Best regards,
Grace
On 11/27/06, T.Sato vef00
the same problem if
I try to send a message to the group from my company ccmail
account. It goes nowhere!
Regards,
Tom
BTW, my little ad,
RCIC = Regulatory Compliance Information Center at
http://uc.com/compliance_engineering/
At 09:57 AM 7/18/96 PDT, you wrote:
Sorry if this is old hat but I'm
Hello Tom,
What kind of products are you testing and where are you discharging
that causes the problems? If the discharge path that causes the
problem is inherent in your design, then it is possible that no PC
that you use will be hardened enough to handle ESD
Hi Tom,
I remember attending an interesting talk given by Ralph Calcavecchio
of IBM, one of the original CIPSR22 guys, who gave us a bit of
historical background.
Basically, CISPR22 radiated emissions limits were determined
empirically by measuring
Author: Tom Bao t...@uc.com at internet
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:8/28/97 11:30 AM
Anyone please tell me where to get Mil-Std? I used to
know it's somewhere in Princeton, NJ or Philidelphia
area. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Tom
in the lab's test report will be reviewed to
determine whether the lab made the intentional radiator measurements
correctly.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
Consultant, EMC and Radio Approvals
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada, CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263fax 650 726 1252 or 413 332 6528
At 3:17 AM -0400
forwarded for: tom_bec...@perkinelmer.com
Forward Header_
Subject:RE: Minnesota and Vermont Mercury labeling law
Author: Becker; Tom tom_bec...@perkinelmer.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: 12/02/99 5:26 PM
Hi All,
We use some
wafer process chambers). For non-residential products no FCC
submission is required but you must meet radiated and/or AC conducted
limits in rules to show compliance with FCC Part 18.
best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263fax
office equipment are almost
identical to the EN55022 in the .450 - 30 MHz range, but don't have a copy
with me here. I recall the limits going down to 10 kHz, perhaps lower.
Best regards
Tom Cokenias
T.N. Cokenias Consulting
P.O. Box 1086
El Granada CA 94018
tel 650 726 1263efax 413 332
Tom,
Thanks for the reply.
After doing some searching on the CENELEC website I was able to confirm
that Amendment 2
to EN 60825-1 is harmonized under both the LVD and RTTED with a DOW of
1/1/2004.
The CENELEC information also indicates that there are no A-Deviations or
Special National
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:35:22 -0500 (EST),
Art Michael amich...@connix.com wrote:
On the Safety Link www.safetylink.com you will find three links to DENAN
resources, including one to Tom Satos' Introduction, another to a
tentative translation of the law, and a third to a tentative translation
Tom,
As I understand it, if you are a member of JEITA then it is a requirement.
Regards,
Josh
Josh Wiseman
EMC/Product Safety
(714) 368-2737
[mailto:jwise...@printronix.com]
-Original Message-
From: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.ne.jp]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:06 PM
To: emc-p
631-419-2324, Fax: 631-567-8322
-Original Message-
From: Tom D. Shirley [mailto:tshir...@fcc.gov]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:13 PM
To: jjuh...@fiberoptions.com
Subject: Part 15 section numbering
Sir,
The Part 15 numbering on that web site reflects the numbering in my current
Yes, it helps. Arigato.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-12-07 22:50, John Allen wrote:
Tom
Thanks, and so not what I had thought - however, that does clarify the
situation and hopefully has answered John
Hi Tom,
thanks for your answer.
Am 27.08.21 um 13:25 schrieb T.Sato:
Although the term "power supply networks" is not defined in the standard,
can't you insist that those ports may be connected to local DC power supply
but will not be connected to "power supply **networks**
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting tomorrow, February 24th, at the Holiday Inn,
Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at 7:00
PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Tom Savino, Senior
Tom
Thanks, and so not what I had thought - however, that does clarify the
situation and hopefully has answered John W's question.
John E Allen
West London, UK
-Original Message-
From: T.Sato [mailto:vef00...@nifty.com]
Sent: 07 December 2018 22:35
To: john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk
Cc
.
Portable laser products are covered by Consumer Product Safety Law,
and procedure including third-party certification would be required
for products covered by the Law.
Regards,
Tom
Tomonori Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
URL: http://member.nifty.ne.jp/tsato/
This message is from the IEEE EMC
.
Has anyone had experience using load cells in this environment? Any
suggestions on vendors?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
tdonnelly@act-sys
Hi Tim,
I do this all the time, Ironically, for Smiths also.
I have three ways I do this, one is using spring fixtures, one using
?
Thanks,
Tom Donnelly
Smiths Aerospace Actuation Systems
tdonnelly@act-sys
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord
1 - 100 of 803 matches
Mail list logo
