Re: SV: EMC test report

All, Just last night, I was re-reading the procedures for Verification (e.g. for Class A ITE) and Declaration of Conformity (e.g. for Class B ITE.) For products subject to Certification, refer to 47CFR2.938, Retention of Records. For products subject to Verification, refer to 47CFRF2.955,

Re: Transformer assessments

IEC 61558 series standards are now/will be EN's in the same series. John Allen - Original Message - From: POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com To: iun...@servomex.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:40 PM Subject: RE: Transformer assessments Ian, We use

Immunity Test System

Group: We are currently considering the purchase of a EMC-Partner TRA2000 Immunity test system. Are there any members of the group that are familiar with, or have used this test system and would be willing to share there comments good or bad. This system appears to provide full compliance

SV: Transformer assessments

EN 61558-1:1997, Safety of power transformers, power supply units and similar -- Part 1: General requirements and tests Scope: Deals with all aspects of safety (such as electrical, thermal and mechanical) of: a) Stationary or portable, single-phase or polyphase, air-cooled (natural or forced)

SV: EMC test report

I don't know what FCC require, but this is a general proposal for a test report: 1. SCOPE OF WORK 2. TEST LABORATORY 3. TEST PERIOD 4. ATTENDING REPRESENTATIVES 5. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST 5.1 Equipment submitted for tests (incl. EUT description, manufacturer, serial number, SW and HW versions, etc)

RE: Inquiry on standard specifying potential ESD hazard reduced to a level BELOW 200V

Folks, Is there a standard specifying that the potential ESD hazard Must Be reduced to a level BELOW 200V ( or other max. voltage ) adjacent to any location where a customer's Semiconductor Device Under Test might be Handled or Contacted. Your comments would be most appreciated. Best Regards,

General Product Safety Directive

Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated ITE product intended soley for business use; and due to its nature, it is highly unlikely to be used by laymen outside that business environment (i.e., not in the home). That product is not subject to the LVD, but it might be subject

RE: Transformer assessments

Ian, We use IEC61558-1 and find it is acceptable for electrical equipment apporved to most EN's. This standard replaces the old IEC60742. I haven't checked to see if there is an equivalent European Norm. Regards, -doug --- Douglas E. Powell, Compliance Engineer Advanced Energy

Re: A very nice game (an example)

From: T.Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp # BTW, a good anti-virus solution is to stop using Microsoft Windows # (at least Microsoft's mailers)! :-) I suppress the preview pane for viewing the contents of my mail and use only two panes, one for mail folders and the other for the list of emails in

Transformer assessments

Do any members have any tips and guidance on the assessments that need to be carried out on transfromers included in apparatus intended for the following market areas: Europe (EN 61010, EN 50021Type n), North America (FM and CSA), plus world-wide. Many thanks Ian Unwin Servomex Group Limited

Re: EMC and Class 2 equipment

This has been my experience with Class II switching power supplies. The absence of the earth connection will make very little difference in the emissions. But, without the earth connection the leakage current requirement is much lower. (For ITE, 3.5mA is allowed for Class I, but only 0.25mA

Re: DSSS WLAN for Australia

Hi Desmond, Conformity assessment in Australia is via declaration of conformity and supporting compliance folder. There is no approval to be applied for. The compliance folder should include a copy of the Part 15.247 report, among other things. The C-tick is required on this kind of WLAN

RE: FCC Contact

Bill didn't take over Art's responsibilities. He is currently working with Art. Neither of them are the source for answers regarding Pt. 15, Pt. 18. or Pt. 68 though. For questions relating to Pt. 15 18 contact Ray La Forge rlafo...@fcc.gov Question relating to Terminal Equipment Attachment

RE: FCC Contact

Try Raymond Laforge [rlafo...@fcc.gov]. Desmond A. Fraser Rhein Tech Labs, Inc. 360 Herndon PKWY, Suite 1400 Herndon, VA 22070 Tel: 703-689-0368 Fax: 703-689-2056 mailto:desm...@rheintech.com -Original Message- From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com] Sent:

Re: A very nice game (an example)

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:44:34 -0700, Doug McKean dmck...@corp.auspex.com wrote: For those interested in how to track down something like this, take a look at the header information. You'l see a bunch of Received: xx lines. In this case there were 6 of them ... Now, take a look at

DSSS WLAN for Australia

Hello Group: We recently received a certification granted for a 2.4 GHZ portable wireless LAN card. The device transmits between 2.4GHz and 2.472 GHz with maximum EIRP levels of less than 15mW. This device was FCC approved under 15.247, Specific absorption rate measurements were also

Country of Origin/Made in xxx-Revisited

To all, The recent threads on Country of Origin and Made in xxx brought up many questions on this subject. So, I did some research. I appeared to get some answers and also created some more questions. Hopefully, members of the group can confirm or disagree with the items listed below. 1.