Can anyone tell me where I can obtain this document. What I really need is
the is the conditions of the ring wave from this document. Can anyone help
me on this?
Best Regards
David W. Hutchins
Director: World Wide Marketing Applications
ProTek Devices
2929 S. Fair Lane
Tempe, AZ 85282 USA
Hi Chris,
How about the little Hi-Pot OK labels that I have seen? I would
assume that these are widely used.
Any sources for these? Or do we have to go to a print shop and pay a
tooling charge to make our own (what a waste)?
Why constrict yourself to just labels? We authorize either
Hi all,
I previously asked about Hi-Pot testing and NRTL labeling.
Ok, so there is no such thing as a standard UL, CSA ... label that can
be purchased. Although the logos are available on the website, the
labels have to be re-invented for every company (yawn). Seems like a
waste of time to
I read in !emc-pstc that David Heald davehe...@mediaone.net wrote (in
3c0512fd.7eb9...@mediaone.net) about '[Fwd: clearance and working
voltage]', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
Forwarded to the list for xingwb xin...@cesi.ac.cn.
Dave Heald
EMC-PSTC Admin
Begin forwarded message
Hi group I have a
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilkeflcbaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'Smarthouse products
and Conducted emission', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
1. Equipment which communicates on power lines, typical Smarthouse products,
often use the CEBus standard. I
Two more questions
Newgroup Lingo?
In the following, IIRC means If I Recall Correctly
The 'dow' for the old edition is given in the front of the new one and
is 2001-07-01, IIRC. I can't check at this instant. So you needed to re-
test before that date (1 July this
I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com wrote
(in D9223EB959A5D511A98F00508B68C20C0226B685@ORSMSX108) about 'Revised
EMC standards and CE Declarations.', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
Hey, John. I resemble that remark. I'm not complaining, just pointing out
a practical result of
I read in !emc-pstc that Mark Werlwas mark.werl...@home.com wrote (in
006701c1782b$69f56020$6401a...@frmt1.sfba.home.com) about 'Quality
Assurance and Product Approvals', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
On the aspect of the where to put Product Safety/Compliance in the
organization discussion bears
Hi all,
1. Equipment which communicates on power lines, typical Smarthouse products,
often use the CEBus standard. I think they are using the frequency band
100kHz-400kHz for transmitting.
How can equipment like this fulfil the conducted emission requirements
(0.15-30MHz), when you are measuring
Maybe this problem is even more insidious:
Ask your HR department if they have a Radford Benchmark Salary Survey
Job Description -for the work you do.
(or equivalent to AON Consulting/Radford Associates service)
I became aware some months ago that in some parts of the industry do not
have
a
On the aspect of the where to put Product Safety/Compliance in the
organization discussion bears mentioning on the forum. In general I
advocate that the Product Safety/Compliance department be separate from
Engineering, Sales, and Operations. The Safety/Compliance group should
Charles,
I would like to offer an explanation for EMC limits being set where they are
and a reason for meeting or beating the limits. I agree, 0.5 dB doesn't seem
like the end of the world and under management guidance/pressure to ship
product and produce revenue, it takes a lot of conviction to
Charles,
Yup, I knew that. I think that Dell recognizes that the whole compliance
picture involves more than just getting some certification marks slapped on
the product.
Daniel E. Teninty, P.E.
Managing Partner
DTEC Associates LLC
Streamlining The Compliance Process
Advancing New Products To
One comment on the VP for compliance..
It is my undersyand that the Dell VP position does
ALL the functions that are imposed by legislation
on a compamy. EMC is one part. There is of course
Safety, Environmental Issues, Lead-free solder etc..
Dell is taking a very professional approach to
Hi all,
I have been following this discussion with great interest
and could not resist adding my 2c.
Lest face it - EMC is nothing more than pure overhead to
any corporation. We all have experience of products that
work perfectly fine yet fail the emissions profile by
0.5dB. I will contend
Hi Jerry:
Will a production line hipot test be required?
As far as I know, the only certification house that
requires a production-line hi-pot test of TNV circuits
is UL. The test is specified in the gray pages as a
separate test from that of the mains hi-pot test.
Since you
Forwarded to the list for xingwb xin...@cesi.ac.cn.
Dave Heald
EMC-PSTC Admin
Begin forwarded message
Hi group I have a question regarding clearance and working voltage of
IEC60950. If I HAVE A AC ADAPTER(AC 100-240V 50/60Hz) ,THE WORKING
VOLTAGE MEASURED ARE AS FOLLOWS: Nominal supply voltage:
In a message dated 11/27/2001, Jerry Martin writes:
I'm working on a product that is telecom network powered (-190 Vdc) and will
most likely require a production line hipot test. Being network powered, it
is exposed to outside plant surges and has transient protection designed in
(fuse
The Board of Certified Safety Processionals used to have a Certification
Specialty in Product Safety.
There was so little interest in it that it was dropped. The closest that they
have now is a Specialty in System Safety.
Just like Dan says below about the requirement for PEs to sign off
Those removable links can be fuses, which are a good idea to use with
sidactors or MOVs anyway.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:28 AM
To:
Does anyone out there know the latest information on the Argentina's IRAM
program?
Has phase 3 been postponed?
Has professional equipment been exempted?
Thanks in advance,
Don Clayton
ESR Engineering
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
Yes. But if some of the tests in EN 50082-1:1992 is exactly the same as in
EN 50082-1:1997, you don't have to repeat those tests. As far as I remember
some tests have the same test specifications (fast transient...), but they
refer to other basic standards.
I suggest you re-test them all.
Note
I read in !emc-pstc that Jerry Martin martin_je...@juno.com wrote (in
20011128040805.12712.qm...@juno.com) about 'Production Line Hipot Test
for Network Powered Equipment', on Wed, 28 Nov 2001:
Has anyone had experience with this and how do you go about removing soldered
sidactors to do the
Hello PSTC members!
I'm working on a product that is telecom network powered (-190 Vdc) and will
most likely require a production line hipot test. Being network powered, it is
exposed to outside plant surges and has transient protection designed in (fuse
and sidactor).
UL's Follow-up
I read in !emc-pstc that jasonxmall...@netscape.net wrote (in
06088e8c.700456bd.73ea6...@netscape.net) about 'Revised EMC standards
and CE Declarations.', on Tue, 27 Nov 2001:
EN 50082-1:1992 was replaced by EN 50082-1:1997. According to the
newapproach.org website, from 1/7/2001 the old version
25 matches
Mail list logo
