To avoid (the cost of) multiple listing: The UL file number does not have to
be placed on the product. There is no reference to the manufacturer required
anywhere on the product. UL assigns a control number to your Listing mark.
This control number is proprietary with UL and not available to
Richard,
My previous experience with TWT amplifiers is that as you say they do
not like excessive VSWR's. Chamber efects is one thing that would cause bad
VSWR. Another way is turning them on before the antenna is attached.
Another way is to misthread the acble attached to the TWT.
I
Negotiate with customer. If he doesn't want your UL file number have him pay
the ML costs. In my dealings hasn't been a real problem either way.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Wiseman [mailto:jwise...@printronix.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:59 AM
To: 'Peter
I have to clarify my response to the forum, as I did with Josh.
There's no extra cost UNLESS the form is filled-out as such.
It's how the form is filled out, and the deal that was worked out between the
two companies.
The Multiple Listing application (known as 'Dual Authorization and
All,
Please remember that postings about viruses (no matter how well meaning -
and even about those that appear on the listserver) are strongly discouraged
on this forum. Such postings add to the noise on the forum and can greatly
slow email access times for those with dial-up connections.
The Multiple listee pays the cost of the second file.
The original applicant only pays for it's file.
There is no extra cost to bear by the original applicant.
John A. Juhasz
GE Interlogix
Fiber Options Div.
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Wiseman
The first is much more cost effective.
With the second you have to pay the maintenance fee for both files.
Josh Wiseman
EMC/Product Safety
-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:45 AM
To: 'Dave Grant';
I got a virus message from this email. See below.
Josh Wiseman
EMC/Product Safety
-Original Message-
From: lfresearch [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:12 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: W32.Elkern removal tools
-- Virus
Chris,
I'm copying a response I gave back in July on this subject. The R. Stahl
link is very helpful.
Best regards,
Dave
512.695.5871
www.lorusso.com
=
This brings back a lot of memories; my first job out of college
was with
Do you know if this bug came through the IEEE fire wall? Any more info
available? I went to the F-sure site but was unsure if I should download
the removal tool. Anyone use it yet?
Jim
Jim
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Do you know if this bug came through the IEEE fire wall? Any more info
available? I went to the F-sure site but was unsure if I should download
the removal tool. Anyone use it yet?
Jim
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Hello,
Check
www.hdusa.net HDusa.
regards,
Ken Hall
-Original Message-
From: KC CHAN [PDD] [mailto:kcc...@hkpc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:22 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Antenna mast
Dear all
I would like to see if anyone who knows the contract of
On November 14, Dave Grant wrote:
We will be shipping identical products to the USA under two brand names.
Can we obtain UL certification for one brand name only and use the same UL
certification for the other brand name?
If the products are truly identical, only one evaluation is needed.
Dave, John is correct in you do need to discuss it with UL. You only need
to send
one product to UL to test. There will be some additional cost, but not much.
The amount
will depend on how you go about it and what your and the customers needs
are. We
have done it several different ways and
Group,
The last response to recommended reading on basic EMC was very
good.
Are there some recommended texts on application of the intrinsic
safety standards, designing for I.S. and/or application of the
directive?
Any thoughts/pointers welcome
Best regards
- Chris Chileshe
- Ultronics
attachment: 5937_notebook_trioffer1[1].jpg
CSA has far to many National Differences to list, I'm afraid you'll have to
purchase the standard from CSA. Sorry. (Maybe NEMKO can help you? They
have an agreement with CSA).
Chris Colgan
Compliance Engineer
TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
The Summit, Latham Road
Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU
*Tel: +44
Following the thread on this discussion reminds me of a problem that I
had when I first graduated.
I worked in a TV studio equipment RD lab where dc power was wired around the
building. At one point I experienced considerable noise problems at
the output of a video amplifier function that I
I am interested in answers to the following:-
1. Is e-mark applied to components or units?
For example, a hand phone, a handsfree kit and cigarette adapter. They
might be sold in a unit of product or separately. Obviously, the hand
phone is not only designed to work in car and it carries
Dear all
I would like to see if anyone who knows the contract of HD GmbH in Germany as I
have one antenna mast, MA-240 that need to be fixed. The office in US said
they cannot provide repair service.
Or any service centre in Asian area?
Thank you
KC Chan
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com [mailto:richwo...@tycoint.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 6:00 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Radiated immunity testing above 1 GHz
I need to make a decision on an amplifier for radiated
immunity testing in
the 1-2
Hello All
We are looking at breaking into the United States with our product and a
question has arisen.
We will be shipping identical products to the USA under two brand names.
Can we obtain UL certification for one brand name only and use the same UL
certification for the other brand name?
22 matches
Mail list logo
