Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Nyffenegger, Dave
After the big hurricane goes through and takes out all the communications lines and cell phone towers for a 100,000 people then they get a better standing for the Ham operators at least. -Dave From: Sundstrom, Mike [mailto:mike.sundst...@garmin.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:10 AM

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread dward
Nah – they just had a bigger lobby when the FCC rules were put in place:) So, that is why no one invites me to dinner ​ Dennis Ward This communication and its attachements contain information from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc., and I sintended for the exclusive use of the

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Luisa Haig
Shaking my head! LOL! Lu From: Sundstrom, Mike [mailto:mike.sundst...@garmin.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:10 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws Yes well, I’m a compliance engineer and a Ham radio operator also! That goes far in my

Re: [PSES] OSM decision

2015-02-04 Thread Brian Oconnell
Mr P - Correct about the change of scoped voltage. UL62109-1 scopes 1500Vdc (not listed by ANSI or SCC yet), and NEC article 690 will be also updated. FWIW, took customer's box back to the ranch and did several fault conditions and some surge stuff(C62.41 and 4-5). What a mess. They never

Re: [PSES] Using NEMA Receptacles in Europe

2015-02-04 Thread Kunde, Brian
“As Dave correctly noted, most European countries would disqualify a typical NEMA configuration because there are exposed live plug blades during the insertion/removal process. There are a few manufacturers of NEMA twist-lock devices that include a sleeve around the plug blades that eliminates

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Sundstrom, Mike
Yes well, I’m a compliance engineer and a Ham radio operator also! That goes far in my public standings I can tell you! Thanks, Michael Sundstrom Garmin Compliance Engineer 2-2606 (913) 440-1540 KB5UKT It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. Henry David Thoreau From:

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Michael Derby
It would be disappointing if emissions from household items were ever fully eliminated because it’s the only way I can explain to people what I do for a living. “What do you do…..” “Well, you know that crackling noise you get from the radio when someone is using a hair dryer…..” If

Re: [PSES] Using NEMA Receptacles in Europe

2015-02-04 Thread Ted Eckert
Hello Brian, In theory, a NEMA L15-20 with a sleeve could be compliant with European requirements. However, theory and reality are going to collide with unpleasant results. I tried this once in the past with a different North American connector. In the end, I had to get the connector tested

[PSES] OSHA NRTL lists

2015-02-04 Thread Brian Oconnell
Can the Recognized Testing Standards lists on the OSHA (NRTL) web site be considered current ? If not, what is the canonical and authoritative listing for each recognized NRTL? Thanks, Brian - This message is from the IEEE

Re: [PSES] OSHA NRTL lists

2015-02-04 Thread Kevin Robinson
Hi Brian, I am currently serving as the Acting Director of OSHA's NRTL Program, and the list available on the OSHA website https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/list_standards.html is current. There is a current proposal to add and remove several standards from this list

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Pete Perkins
Interesting discussion. The lack of prior experience with equipment such as this industrial cut-off saw seems to come from folks who do not regularly work with machinery and the Machinery Directive. Having done some of this type of

Re: [PSES] Using NEMA Receptacles in Europe

2015-02-04 Thread Kunde, Brian
A, yes. The line to line voltage is higher. I didn’t think of that. We would also have a 400-480V version, but of course the 250 volt NEMA connectors would not work, not to mention the hassle of trying to get them certified. I always recommend the IEC60309 connectors but everyone complains

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Nyffenegger, Dave
And it's even more fun when the other guy that doesn't do it is an EU company being compared to US companies importing into the EU that have to do it. -Dave From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@esterline.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:38 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Kunde, Brian
Pete, I think you have a good understanding of the situation. You are right; they avoid doing EMC testing because of the cost, but we don't do business that way. When we offer to perform EMC testing on their products for free, they say NO because they would rather be ignorant and ship products

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Gary McInturff
And the dreaded - the other guy doesn't do it why are we Heavy sigh. By the way not too long ago I saw the pragmatic answer to that. Company A built a product. For whatever reason Company B challenged the EMC. They tested at a lab and sure enough failure. I don't know how badly it failed but it

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Michael Derby
Ha ha ha. You know you’re in a boring job when you pretend to be a drug dealer to enhance your social acceptability. J Michael Derby Senior Regulatory Engineer Director ACB Europe From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: 04 February 2015 13:38 To:

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Kunde, Brian
I know what you mean. I just tell people I’m a drug dealer. That they understand. ☺ The Other Brian From: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 4:45 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws It would be

Re: [PSES] EMC on Industrial Cut-Off Saws

2015-02-04 Thread Cortland Richmond
Well, not if we read Part 15::§15.5 General conditions of operation.(b) Operation of an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator is subject to the conditions that no harmful interference is caused and that interference must be accepted that may be caused by the operation of an authorized