For what products, as explicitly as possible? A 'general-purpose'
entity, that doesn't understand the product but does understand the fee,
is a menace. The AR need to know as much as possible (or as the
manufacturer can afford) about the product.
There is also a question in my mind as to whether there can be partial
cancellation of touch current. I suspect this is highly improbable in
the US, due to the distribution system ensuring that the neutral has a
very low voltage difference from the PEC. But in Europe, it's not
inconceivable
Hello all,
I have a client who is looking for an entity in the UK they can contract with
to be their UK AR.
Any suggestions, preferably based on experience?
Thanks,
Steve Brody
sgbr...@comcast.net mailto:sgbr...@comcast.net
C - 603 617 9116
-
I wish to make two points:
1. Kirchoff’s Current Law states that the sum of currents entering a node
equals the sum of currents leaving the node. The Law applies to summation of
leakage (touch) currents (e.g., through a 2,000-ohm resistor) and to summation
of protective
Greetings all,
We are looking into Germany's Information Security requirements that is
mandated by the German Federal Office for Information Security. Does anyone
in the group have any experience with their process?
Any assistance and advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thank-you,
In general, the Class 1 appliances have metal enclosure whereas Class 2
have plastic enclosure. There is a small group of products that are Class
1 without an access earth point, i.e. shredding machines, desktop fans,
laptop/monitor power suppliers, etc. What are the real benefits from such
Hi Brain
Method #1 and #2 are equivalent (if the were the same standard):
#2 list 3 documents that -once merged- form one harmonised standard
#1 list the original standard plus the applicable harmonised amendment
Method 3 is not recommended IMHO.
Gert gremmen
On 24-8-2022 21:48, Brian
7 matches
Mail list logo
