Hi All
So let me see if I have this right please guys.
RED is being fully implemented in June 2017. In this radio receiver
requirements are now essential requirements. So come June 2017, focusing on
technical performance only for now, to supply to the EEA we need product to
meet these
From: Dave Heald [mailto:emcp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 November 2015 22:48
To: Pearson, John
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Updating EU ErP reports for Level VI adapters?
Hi John,
Agreed. EMC & Safety reports should be updated as applicable as these could
have meanin
Hi
Change of PSU to VI could affect EMC performance Radiated and Conducted as well
as Immunity for the wacky places that insist on this (EEA etc). You need
representative results for these requirements (i.e. test reports with the
correct/representative PSU)
John
From: Rodney Davis
Hello
If you are selling into the EU your DoC declaring to the harmonized std
(assuming you are taking this route) states that you are confirming that each
and every item of product placed upon the market is compliant to the limit and
not just the test sample. Does that not mean you will
Hi
Thanks for the latin lesson John.
Equipment which is inherently benign in terms of electromagnetic compatibility
is excluded from the scope of the EMC Directive25. Equipment is considered
inherently benign in terms of electromagnetic compatibility if:
* its inherent physical characteristics
Hi
Thanks
When the card is inserted in the reader it is powered. Thus it also makes
sense to test the card in a representative reader as well as the other way
around.
Re CE marking I can't find the document on Europa you referred to Charlie to
(can you point to it please for interest).
Should a Credit Card carry the CE mark
Chip and pin along with NFC
Discuss?
John Pearson, Senior Director, Corporate Product Compliance
Polycom (UK) Ltd. |Singleton Court Business Centre Wonastow Road Ind. Est.,
Monmouth, NP255JA, United Kingdom | T: +44 1753 723165 | M: +44 7968 064105
-
.polycom.com,
dated Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Pearson, John john.pear...@polycom.com
writes:
Also see Article 5 in its entirety over time limits. Cl 3 is important
and the way this is worded helps to add clarity to the 2 year time
limit (the unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature
This is not a two year warranty. If the customer buys an item it may last six
months say and it may be expected to last six months due to its form fit and
normal expectation (article 2.2) and this is fine. The 2 year time limit is to
allow the user to become aware that the item has not
Hello
Been doing some more reading
SI 1994 No 1768 is the Plug and Socket safety regs for the UK. In this it
appears that this product falls outside the scope of this regulation.
It seems to be only classifiable under the SI as a Part 1 product, quote any
plug, socket or adaptor
No. 3478646
On 13 Mar 2015, at 14:43, John Woodgate
j...@jmwa.demon.co.ukmailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message
04cab9802ba27a409548dd47de1da7ef8d8c128...@slomailprd01.polycom.commailto:04cab9802ba27a409548dd47de1da7ef8d8c128...@slomailprd01.polycom.com,
dated Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Pearson, John
Here is a Friday discussion topic for you guys.
In the UK we are seeing a plethora of aftermarket 250v AC mains outlet sockets
which are supplied for installation, it seems by the homeowner, (this has been
a traditional practice over here. In the US I understand that this happens
less). The
I find it surprising that an accredited lab can have test standards listed on
their scope undated. How can certain accredited authorities do that?
John
John Pearson, Senior Director, Corporate Product Compliance
Polycom (UK) Ltd. | Singleton Court Business Centre Wonastow Road Ind. Est.,
Hi
I would suspect that someone supplying equipment, clearly designed for use by
employees of a company, shpould meet the below requirements regadless as to
supply equipment not meeting this would deem the product unsuitable for use.
In such a suituation the user would likely have a claim
An oft missed but important issue for manufacturers using 3rd party safety test
labs is the indemnity liability clause in the agreement. Manufacturers need to
be careful that indemnity is sufficient in the event of a faulty test issue
that results in a recall or incident.
Cost and competence
Hi Bob
I don't know what's applicable to these products personally but the official
answer is to go through the EMCD OJ listing for harmonized stds
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/european-standards/harmonised-standards/electromagnetic-compatibility/index_en.htm
and decide based upon
Hi
Any opinions on this?
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/energy/blogs/skirting-eu-law-the-rebranding-of-incandescent-bulbs-as-heat-balls
Do the members feel that the legislation is working or is it counterproductive
in respect of ecological aims not just from energy saving from cradle to
Hi John
Thanks
My thinking is it isn't just price $'wise but also price to the environment in
both material and energy?
JohnP
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John Woodgate
Sent: 24 August 2012 16:25
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Hi
For the sake of discussion, I would like to open up for debate the suggestion
the EU process is one of the most unreasonably excessive in the world.
With the exception of China and Brazil this is the one major region that
imposes retrospective recertification costs due to the introduction
There is equipment that is both
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Carpentier
Kristiaan
Sent: 06 November 2008 13:00
To: Barker, Neil; SYKES WILLIAM T-WRQ876; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: EN 300386 - RE: New Official Journal list of
20 matches
Mail list logo
