pass. In this way, the customer’s
motor would not be damaged or degraded.
Thank-you,
…Richard Georgerian
HID Global
Compliance Engineer
From: Brian Kunde
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 9:46 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] NRTL Marks on Industrial Pump Assemblies
as 3 phase induction motors. Energy efficiency compliance generally cannot
> be judged at the incorporated level.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -Lauren
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Kunde
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2022 2:01 PM
> *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEE
PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] NRTL Marks on Industrial Pump Assemblies
External Email: Do NOT reply, click on links, or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you believe this email
may be unsafe, please click on the “Report Phishi
a possibility, as well as 3
phase induction motors. Energy efficiency compliance generally cannot be judged
at the incorporated level.
Best Regards,
-Lauren
From: Brian Kunde
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 2:01 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] NRTL Marks on Industrial Pump Assemblies
crazy making by AHJ's that have no engineering knowledge.
Electric motors, certainly.
physical: pumps, any of the variety I am familiar with, have no hazards for
safety.
Even when stalled and pumping no where.
As a system, there might be a problem.
Assume that is a system approval and is custom
Brian --
My gut is that it's reasonable to expect a UL/CSA marking on a 3-phase 460 VAC
motor, but that listings for pumps are quite a bit rarer.
Are there unique hazards associated with the pump should it fail? If not, I'd
concentrate on the motor marking.
Contact me off this list-serve if
I am confused and frustrated. We have an industrial product that includes
a small water recirculation tank which includes a motor/pump assembly that
is powered by 230V/360V/460Vac 3-phase. Our NRTL inspectors says this pump
assembly must have UL, CSA, or equivalent. Here is a website that shows
Although I'm not familiar with the issue, maybe OSHA should charge NRTLs
exorbitant fees for their label changes. This might relieve their
headache, and give the NRTLs a taste of their own medicine.
Pat
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Robinson kevinrobinso...@gmail.com
wrote:
Brian,
Good People,
Per OSHA and 29CFR1910, the images for the various marks shall be registered.
For the third time, yet another NRTL has mandated a mark change where there is
no record of the image in the OSHA database for registered NRTL marks.
Previously, an NRTL has issued a change notice so an
Hi Brian,
Old adage, if it ain't written down, it doesn't exist. Same fight over a design
change that is not supported by a clause to interpret.
Scott - the retired one
On Sep 29, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Brian Oconnell oconne...@tamuracorp.com wrote:
Good People,
Per OSHA and 29CFR1910, the
Brian,
I am responding from my personal account which is where I monitor the
EMC-PSTC, so this can not serve as an Official Response from OSHA, but if
you would like something, more official, I have included my work e-mail
below. For the purpose of this discussion, I will keep my comments
11 matches
Mail list logo
