In message
bn3pr0801mb097985bfe1773ece195b9c5285...@bn3pr0801mb0979.namprd08.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Nyffenegger, Dave
dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com writes:
Annex VII states the technical file shall include ?a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity;? Don?t know if this
In message 20150317.133927.1501...@webmail08.vgs.untd.com, dated Tue,
17 Mar 2015, Brian Gregory brian_greg...@netzero.net writes:
I would not use either S/N or model numbers.
Some EU Directives require each unit to be positively identifiable, for
recall if necessary. I don't see how to do
: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:39:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Advice from one with mostly US experience, but with an NRTL/NB:
Until otherwise prohibited by MD, best practices are:
- use of company issued documentation to properly describe the products
by the
certifications and product use applications are concerned. another Brian
-- Original Message --
From: Mike Sherman - Original Message - msherma...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Brian -- I would think a model
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Advice from one with mostly US experience, but with an NRTL/NB:
Until otherwise prohibited by MD, best practices are:
- use of company issued documentation to properly describe the products
In message
!!AAAYAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAEEULGsOsvGJLiX+xX
MTd1qEBAA==@blueyonder.co.uk, dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, John Allen
john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
But many companies that make genuine (or ?other?!) products also have
dubious employees, or importers
as one might have with
the technical file (either electronically or hard copy) would logical.
-Dave
From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 3:37 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Exactly
Hi Brian:
Ask the test lab to provide you with the documents
that specify what they want. After all, you want
to do what is right!
Good luck,
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D3725@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
To do what they want we would have to type up a custom DoC for every
instrum!
ent we build with a dedicated document number, have it signed, and
I'm getting beat up again in France for non-compliances according to the
machinery Directive on our Nameplate and DoC. I know we have discussed these
issues in the past but I was wondering if things have changed or become clearer
over time. We want to do things right but some items are hard for
, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:19 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
I'm getting beat up again in France for non-compliances according to the
machinery Directive on our Nameplate and DoC. I know we
, 2015 12:18:55 PM
Subject: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
I'm getting beat up again in France for non-compliances according to the
machinery Directive on our Nameplate and DoC. I know we have discussed these
issues in the past but I was wondering if things have changed
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D3825@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
Exactly my point. Complicated. And once you put a serial number on the
DoC it becomes a Static Document with its unique document number and it
In message
7B9D892F88F070469771832D78B3086E284AA5F6@013-BR1MPN1-011.MGDPBI.global.p
vt, dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Jim Hulbert jim.hulb...@pb.com writes:
Does the signature on a DoC need to be original or would an digital
(or scanned) signature be acceptable?
On the DoC in the Technical File,
to be
signed in ink!
John Allen
W.London, UK
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: 16 March 2015 20:59
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
In message
7B9D892F88F070469771832D78B3086E284AA5F6@013
: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
In message
mailto:64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D3825@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D3825@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Kunde, Brian mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com
In message
!!AAAYAEGjmYsMtGZAuvo7rFLQ++figAAAEOSVX14CAFpCsdQXY
e/TaogBAA==@blueyonder.co.uk, dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, John Allen
john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk writes:
I'm sure that the corporate legal eagles of my old US employer (they
really are a Big Name in the
and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
In message
64D32EE8B9CBDD44963ACB076A5F6ABB026D3725@Mailbox-Tech.lecotech.local,
dated Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Kunde, Brian brian_ku...@lecotc.com writes:
To do what they want we would have to type up a custom DoC for every
instrum!
ent we build with a dedicated
-
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: 16 March 2015 18:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Does the signature on a DoC need to be original or would an digital (or
scanned) signature be acceptable
you
cannot get around shipping the DoC with the product, right? Thanks.
The Other Brian
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 3:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Nameplate and DoC requirements Machinery Directive
Good evening
20 matches
Mail list logo
