.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Rich
From: Mick Maytum
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 10:09 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
Pete,
Glad to see your thoughts agree with mine. With large amplitude voltage
pulses there must
p has
which might have some better technical details?*
**
*/Ed Price
/**WB6WSN**/
/**Chula Vista, CA USA*
**
*From:*Pete Perkins
[mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2019 5:26 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] classificati
] classification of the output
Joe,
I am familiar with this product that stops the saw blade and
protects fingers. I talked with them during development; their primary problem
was that the product wasn’t explicitly covered under the standards for the
product they were intending this for
https://ict-surge-protection-essays.co.uk/
-- Original Message --
From: "Pete Perkins"
To: "Mick Maytum" ; EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Sent: 13/03/2019 06:11:38
Subject: RE: [PSES] classification of the output
Mick, Thanx for the reply given on this thread.
Joe,
I think that you are referring to the SawStop invented by Steve Glass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dekzPA6nhC4
shows it in action.
John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, Master EMC
Design Eng, SM IEEE (retired)
216 Hillsboro Ave
Lexington, KY 40511-2105
(859)
Re: [PSES] classification of the output
Hi Pete,
What manufacturer is expecting is the exact answer. Does this output
complies with ES1 or it is ES2? And of course justification for this
decision. If I accept it as ES1 and then later the other certification
body says it is ES2 it is a big probl
value, and the current is not. But only
one parameter, voltage or current, is needed to determine ES1.
Good luck, and best regards,
Rich
From: Glavič
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:34 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
.@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
Entropy ain’t what it used to be
From: Mick Maytum
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 1:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
Joe Randolph and I talked about “pulsed power” delivery at the 2019 ATIS-PEG
confere
-
From: "Joe Randolph"
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Sent: 12/03/2019 17:54:36
Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
Hi Pete:
This discussion reminds me of some things I have been hearing about
“digital power” as a way to deliver large amounts of power while
kee
with the ES1 requirements in the standard!
Best regards,
Rich
From: Ted Eckert <07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 8:21 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
Although the recent disc
Hi Boštjan:
Following up on my previous comment.
Chances are the IEC 60990 touch current measurement scheme will not have a
steady state current, but instead a fluctuating current. Especially if the
PS output has a source impedance during the "off" state, which would
discharge the touch
Woodgate
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:04:52 +
> To: Ken Javor ,
> Subject: Re: [PSES] classification of the output
>
> Trouble is, you can never be sure . It might be Air Force 1 that gets
> the EMI!
>
> On 2019-03-08 15:56, Ken Javor wrote:
>> Re: [PSES] class
ous issue.
> >
> > Ken Javor
> > Phone: (256) 650-5261
> >
> >
> >
> > *From: *John Woodgate
> > *Reply-To: *John Woodgate
> > *Date: *Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:41:41 +
> > *To: *
> > *Subject: *Re: [PSES] classification of
Trouble is, you can never be sure . It might be Air Force 1 that gets
the EMI!
On 2019-03-08 15:56, Ken Javor wrote:
Re: [PSES] classification of the output Unless the output overload
test modeled something that occurred fairly often in practice, it
seems to me that EMI caused during such an
14 matches
Mail list logo
