Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-24 Thread Rich Nute
Hello from San Diego: Kevin Harris asks some questions about temperature measurements. 1. Is this a valid temperature measurement for the PCB? I'm of two minds on this. It could said that I'm really measuring the diodes temperature and not the PCB. On the other hand the diode pad

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-18 Thread Doug McKean
...@compaq.com To: 'dmck...@paragon-networks.com'; 'IEEE Product Safety Technical Committee -' emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: EN 60950 and component heating Date: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 4:27 PM Doug, To answer your question of which is better: The primary concern should

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-18 Thread Egon H. Varju
Mark: I don't really think that you'd want to have a shiny, conductive piece of aluminium foil bouncing around inside your power supply, shorting things out and compromising your spacings. These self-adhesives don't last too long under ageing ... Cheers, Egon :-)

EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-17 Thread Tac Pham
Hello Kevin, The heating test performed on your PCB is to verify the compliance of the PCB usage. In some cases, the temperature on the body of non-safety critical components must verify to determine the appropriate spacing of the surrounding components, such as wires (rated 105) or capacitors

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-17 Thread Doug McKean
Subject: EN 60950 and component heating Date: Monday, September 15, 1997 6:14 PM Hello All, In testing some product for excessive temperatures I have come up against the following problem. Consider a diode (part of a bridge rectifier circuit) and the PCB underneath the component. If one

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-17 Thread Lesmeister, Glenn
Product Safety Technical Committee - Subject:Re: EN 60950 and component heating Hi Kevin, I had a rather bad experience between UL and CSA in the older days when there wasn't so much discussion and agreement between them. I had set up an MOU between them with UL as the test location

EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Kevin Harris
Hello All, In testing some product for excessive temperatures I have come up against the following problem. Consider a diode (part of a bridge rectifier circuit) and the PCB underneath the component. If one measures the temperature of the diode it does not come close to the specification for the

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread DouglasScott
___ From: Kevin Harris on Tue, Sep 16, 1997 12:35 AM Subject: EN 60950 and component heating To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Hello All, In testing some product for excessive temperatures I have come up against the following problem. Consider a diode (part

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Mark Hone
To add to Art Michael's ways used to work around the problem of PCBs getting too hot, if the heat is being radiated (rather than conducted through the leads) from the component to the PCB, put a shiny reflective surface on the PCB (self adhesive aluminium foil, or just an area of copper on the

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread jeichner
...@ieee.org}; JEichner; bceresne Subject: EN 60950 and component heating Hello All, In testing some product for excessive temperatures I have come up against the following problem. Consider a diode (part of a bridge rectifier circuit) and the PCB underneath the component. If one measures

RE: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Farnsworth,Heber
). -- From: Kevin Harris To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Subject: EN 60950 and component heating List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Monday, September 15, 1997 3:14PM Hello All, In testing some product for excessive temperatures I have come up against the following problem. Consider a diode (part

Re: EN 60950 and component heating

1997-09-16 Thread Art Michael
Hello Kevin, This is not an uncommon problem as you have probably guessed. Rather than get embroiled in discussing the details of what one should measure, I'd rather offer a couple of ways I've seen used to work around the problem. A) Assuming you are using leaded diodes; Raise the diode off of